United States Austerity: Government now spending less nominally than Bush

[akphidelt]

You're not posting any facts.

You're projecting with this comment.

All I've done is post facts. You guys have look dumb trying to spin the facts to support your failed ideology

 

[Dave007inVegas]

You haven't "shown" anything.

See stupid, the federal government spent more than $3.45 trillion dollars, a more than 27% increase over 2009, last year.

That is not "austerity"

You're a fucking clown.

That's him on the right.

 

[SheriffJoe]

The Federal Government spent $3.67 trillion in FY '11 and some dope takes to the Internet to say that is an example of "austerity"

Hilarious.

Everything is relative for a Keynesian. lol

 

[akphidelt]

The Federal Government spent $3.67 trillion in FY '11 and some dope takes to the Internet to say that is an example of "austerity"

Hilarious.

Oh, I didn't know there was a limit of spending to be considered "austerity". Please show me the math you use to come to the conclusion $3.67 trillion is too large? Are you just afraid of large numbers?

 

[Acebb]

Well you can validate that information as it's just a chart of the facts. Your paper was written in 1999 and it's one of a billion economic research papers you can find online. Didn't realize this needed explaining.

The information is a stupid misrepresentation.

Didn't realize this needed explaining.

 

[Acebb]

Oh, I didn't know there was a limit of spending to be considered "austerity". Please show me the math you use to come to the conclusion $3.67 trillion is too large? Are you just afraid of large numbers?

Um, nobody said it was "too large" you stupid little goal post mover.

 

[akphidelt]

hehehe...nice retort, loser.

Beaten like a rented mule.

Is he stupid, or just a total fucking liar?

Maybe the others would like to chime in?

You can try to insult and spin your way out of it. But there is no doubt that Reagan was one of the biggest government Keynesians we've ever had!

 

[akphidelt]

The information is a stupid misrepresentation.

Didn't realize this needed explaining.

Not a misrepresentation at all. Just a basic chart. Since it doesn't show what you want it to show, you have to come up with all kinds of bullshit to spin your way out of it. Fun to watch though. Keep it up!

 

[Acebb]

All I've done is post facts.

You didn't post the fact that Obama added $450 billion in spending to Bush's last budget, then increased spending by 27% on top of that by FY '11.

You left that part out.

 

[akphidelt]

Um, nobody said it was "too large" you stupid little goal post mover.

You implied it with this statement...

The Federal Government spent $3.67 trillion in FY '11 and some dope takes to the Internet to say that is an example of "austerity"

 

[wabashwonders]

It's actually very simple. The fact you can't understand it, is hilarious.

I tried to show him earlier how simple it was to understand using small numbers to make it easier but all he did was call me an idiot. The guy doesn't understand simple math when it pertains to percent. He thinks higher % automatically means more spending. I don't understand economics but it doesn't take a genius to understand this basic math.

Whats even funnier is Zit saying your being destroyed. He obviously doesn't understand basic math either.

 

[akphidelt]

You didn't post the fact that Obama added $450 billion in spending to Bush's last budget, then increased spending by 27% on top of that by FY '11.

You left that part out.

It's 2014 now.

 

[Acebb]

Not a misrepresentation at all.

Yeah it is.

And how do we know?

It left this part out:

The National Debt has now increased more during President Obama's three years and two months in office than it did during 8 years of the George W. Bush presidency.The Debt rose $4.899 trillion during the two terms of the Bush presidency. It has now gone up $4.939 trillion since President Obama took office.

But of course charts from the "Democratic Leader" are meant for low information voters like you.

 

[SheriffJoe]

You can try to insult and spin your way out of it. But there is no doubt that Reagan was one of the biggest government Keynesians we've ever had!

Nope.

Your "sources" (Democratic Leader lol) are bullshit, plain and simple.

Stop struggling...it'll only hurt more.

 

[akphidelt]

I tried to show him earlier how simple it was to understand using small numbers to make it easier but all he did was call me an idiot. The guy doesn't understand simple math when it pertains to percent. He thinks higher % automatically means more spending. I don't understand economics but it doesn't take a genius to understand this basic math.

Whats even funnier is Zit saying your being destroyed. He obviously doesn't understand basic math either.

Lol, that's what is so hilarious. I keep letting him go on and on because I want to see how long he can last looking so dumb.

 

[Acebb]

I tried to show him earlier how simple it was to understand using small numbers to make it easier but all he did was call me an idiot. The guy doesn't understand simple math when it pertains to percent. He thinks higher % automatically means more spending. I don't understand economics but it doesn't take a genius to understand this basic math.

Whats even funnier is Zit saying your being destroyed. He obviously doesn't understand basic math either.

Um, dum-dum, I already said this to you:

Obama is spending more as a % of GDP and more in real dollars.

I actually highlighted the and part in bold.

What did you do?

You came back, and posted the same dumb bullshit.

 

[akphidelt]

Um, dum-dum, I already said this to you:

Obama is spending more as a % of GDP and more in real dollars.

I actually highlighted the and part in bold.

What did you do?

You came back, and posted the same dumb bullshit.

He's spending relatively less than any president in the last 6 decades. That's a fact.

 

[Acebb]

It's 2014 now.

And then what?

You get to pretend that Obama didn't increase spending or something?

You do realize that saying Obama has spent less by picking Bush's largest budget year vs. Obama's smallest budget year makes you look like an idiot, right?

 

[Acebb]

He's spending relatively less than any president in the last 6 decades. That's a fact.

No he's not.

 

[Acebb]

You implied it with this statement...

The Federal Government spent $3.67 trillion in FY '11 and some dope takes to the Internet to say that is an example of "austerity"

No I didn't.

I said that shows there was and is no "austerity"

You really are stupid.