United States Austerity: Government now spending less nominally than Bush

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Oh, I see...

So the economy still sucks balls, but "doing nothing" would have been worse!

Just like we need more stimulus to make Keynesian magic budge the econ needle. And if that doesn't work, well, we can always use the same excuse over and over again: it wasn't enough!

See? Just like the Climate frauds, Keynesians are never wrong.

The problem is, your bullshit theories/models don't stand up to history - the greater the recession, the stronger the recovery.

Your dumb-ass spenda-holic cult just keeps making it up as you go along.

Their projection was wrong. Unemployment was much higher before the stimulus even went in to effect than they thought it would be. They underestimated how bad the economy really was. Not sure how that implies whether the stimulus worked or not. But you are dumb, so I understand your confusion.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Lol, you can come up with any excuse you want. Economists say the stimulus caused the unemployment rate to be lower than it would have been without it.

It doesn't matter what they said.

The facts prove what they said was wrong.

More than a million fewer people are working today vs when the stimulus was passed.

You idiotically saying "it would have been worse" is pathetically moving the goal posts.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Well it had many economists from very established schools. So I will believe their word more than yours, not going to lie.

They are not my words.

They're facts.

The people surveyed were wrong.

The labor force participation rate demonstrates it so.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Austerity sucks and never works. If we were more like big government Reagan or Bush, unemployment would be much lower and growth would be much higher.

We are not in "austerity"

The Obama government has spent more money than anyone could have dreamed of, passed a "stimulus" that didn't work, and adds more than a $1 billion dollars in debt per day because of the spending, yet fewer people are working.

You don't get it, either because you're dumb, or you have no capacity to examine your beliefs critically.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,426
Tokens
A lot of good fratfraud's "stimulus" did...

The actual share of the the population with a job has collapsed and remains low.


The size of the U.S. labor force has also collapsed, partly due to discouraged Americans giving up looking for a job.


Those without a job have been without a job for a long, long, long time.


ECONOMIC GROWTH

This recovery has lagged others in terms of economic output or GDP growth. (via the Minneapolis Fed)


Economic growth in this recovery has not just lagged the best recoveries of the past or the average recoveries, but the worst other recoveries, too.
(via the Economic Policy Institute)


The result of the weak recovery is a huge gap between where the economy should be, in terms of growth, and where it is.
(via The Wall Street Journal)



And that output gap means there’s an income gap, as well.
(MKM Partners)


The slow, anemic recovery has contributed to keeping the housing market in a depressed state.

xc

The national debt has exploded during the Obama administration.
(Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget)


The White House itself admits that its new budget plan would keep the national debt on a dangerous and unsustainable trajectory.
(The White House)

The current economic picture doesn’t look anything like what the White House promised back in early 2009. (via the Heritage Foundation)

 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
I guess a survey you found on the Internet must be true.

LOL

Well it had many economists from very established schools. So I will believe their word more than yours, not going to lie.

You're a retard conservative. They are economists from schools like Yale, Harvard, MIT, etc. Sorry buddy, but your one of the least credible people I know.

Economists-e1339095310272.png
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
The spending results of this Administration should lead to anyone who believes government spending creates jobs being laughed off the public stage.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
You're a retard conservative. They are economists from schools like Yale, Harvard, MIT, etc. Sorry buddy, but your one of the least credible people I know.

dum-dum,

There are fewer people working than when Obama was sworn in.

It doesn't mater what anyone said to a survey.

The facts are the facts.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
We are not in "austerity"

The Obama government has spent more money than anyone could have dreamed of, passed a "stimulus" that didn't work, and adds more than a $1 billion dollars in debt per day because of the spending, yet fewer people are working.

You don't get it, either because you're dumb, or you have no capacity to examine your beliefs critically.

The data does not coincide with your theory. The government has cut more employees from their workforce than any President in the last 6 decades, the growth of spending is at the lowest it's been in over 6 decades. It's just not even close. This is the most austerity we've ever had in this country. And the results are obvious.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
When you've been reduced to defending a discredited economic theory by saying "hey, it would have been way, way worse guys!" you should probably shut up.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
dum-dum,

There are fewer people working than when Obama was sworn in.

It doesn't mater what anyone said to a survey.

The facts are the facts.

It's really simple to understand. They said the unemployment rate was lower because of the stimulus. It's not rocket science.

Economists-e1339095310272.png
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
The data does not coincide with your theory. The government has cut more employees from their workforce than any President in the last 6 decades, the growth of spending is at the lowest it's been in over 6 decades. It's just not even close. This is the most austerity we've ever had in this country. And the results are obvious.

The government is spending more money than ever before.

The results are obvious.

We told you so.

Sincerely,

Conservatives.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The government is spending more money than ever before.

The results are obvious.

We told you so.

Sincerely,

Conservatives.

Every administration spent more money than ever before during their time. What's your point?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
They said the unemployment rate was lower because of the stimulus

Laugh out loud funny.

So you're now reduced to saying it government spending doesn't really lead to growth, it just prevents, temporarily mind you, catastrophic losses.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,986
Messages
13,575,792
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com