Do you have some point to make in posting these alleged numbers which you failed to back up with any reliable source?
Even if accurate, are you ready to put your life at risk for no reason by acting irresponsibly or encouraging others who could infect & kill you via C-19 to act irresponsibly?
Are you willing to risk your life, if you are 70 years of age or older on an almost 5 in 1000 chance you'll die?
Are you willing to risk being hospitalized or put in ICU or suffering long term C-19 negative health effects? Read more about that here:
https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/c-19-damaging-the-health-of-many-survivors.723087/
The same could be said about the numbers you list above.
You are entitled to your one sided, non objective, biased emotional opinion. Many others disagree with you.
Healthy people are not the only ones dying from C-19. A million are dead already. With extreme safety measures in place. It would be way more than that without them.
And death isn't the only concern:
"I was infected with coronavirus in March, six months on I’m still unwell
Charlie Russell, 27, is one of an estimated 600,000 people with post-Covid illness, a condition that may give an insight into ME"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...m-still-unwell
The CDC Sept 10 updated the survival rates (i.e., IF infected) for Covid19:
0-19 99.997%
20-49 99.98%
50-69 99.5%
70+ 94.6%
THINK.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
It is criminal that the media has supressed this, kids should all be in school, younger adults should all be at work, all athletes should be playing, older citizens and / or those with underlying conditions should be careful, stay home as much as possible.
0-19 99.997%
20-49 99.98%
50-69 99.5%
70+ 94.6%
THINK.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
It is criminal that the media has supressed this, kids should all be in school, younger adults should all be at work, all athletes should be playing, older citizens and / or those with underlying conditions should be careful, stay home as much as possible.
Suppressed? What are you talking about? Search the news media on the subject.
See also:
Necessary precautions? Shutdowns were the most effective precaution there was from a cautious health expert perspective. That's why the experts advocated lockdowns. They worked to save millions of lives from death, as well as millions of others from illness, hospitalization, ICU & long term negative health effects. Which would have impacted economies negatively. And led to hospitals being overwhelmed & having to choose between who lives & who dies because they wouldn't have been able to treat many emergency patients on arrival & have been forced to turn many away from timely needed emergency care. Leading to many more deaths.
So you're saying you advocated a Swedish approach "all along" from the beginning of the pandemic? Are you not aware that Sweden has suffered way more infections and deaths relative to their Nordic neighbours with no advantage economically? The Sweden approach has been a failure!
Are you not aware that even apparently healthy young people are dying & suffering long term negative consequences from C-19, in addition to suffering in ICU's from the illness. Which you ignored from my previous post.
"I was infected with coronavirus in March, six months on I’m still unwell
Charlie Russell, 27, is one of an estimated 600,000 people with post-Covid illness, a condition that may give an insight into ME"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...m-still-unwell
More on the long term negative effects of C-19 infection here:
https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/c-19...vivors.723087/
As for the shutdowns, what is obviously clear is they have had many benefits:
1) serious vehicular accidents & deaths are way way down
2) flu deaths & serious complications have decreased tremendously
3) C-19 ill health & deaths are far less due to the lockdowns
4) likewise probably other communicable diseases (e.g. tuberculosis, HIV) have been greatly reduced by the extreme safety measures in place
5) street crimes have probably been highly reduced.
6) families have been able to spend more time together enjoying each others company while free from the slavery of that 4 letter word "work" that the vast majority hate. Giving more time for quality of life activities like sex & various entertainments.
7) abortions (child murder) are probably down.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread...1#post13211637
Many kids & young people's lives have already been saved due to the worldwide lockdowns.
Because motor vehicle accident deaths are the #1 leading worldwide cause of death in such.
"Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for U.S. teens."
https://www.google.com/search?q=lead...hrome&ie=UTF-8
"Each year, 1.35 million people are killed on roadways around the world.4
"...Road traffic injuries are estimated to be the eighth leading cause of death globally for all age groups and the leading cause of death for children and young people 5–29 years of age. More people now die in road traffic crashes than from HIV/AIDS.4"
https://www.cdc.gov/injury/features/...nd%20cyclists.
As for "trillions in damage", there would have been huge economic damage with or without the shutdowns. Without shutdowns millions more people get ill, hospitalized, suffer long term ill health & death leading to employees being absent from work, businesses shutdown anyway, & in many cases for much longer, etc.
