Followed by
Ya, Joe, you add a lot of value down here.
Next it will be the wall, then it will be deporting 11 million illegals, then it will be renegotiating NAFTA, etc.. But hey, he saved a Ford plant that was never going to Mexico from going to Mexico. Good stuff. What a time to be alive!
And when he starts "softening" on the wall, mass deportations, refugees, climate change, etc. will that be for leverage also?
Followed by
Ya, Joe, you add a lot of value down here.
Well, an emoji is an appropriate lazy response when someone doesn't add any substance and veers straight off topic. I liken it to leaving a penny for a tip.
This keeps up I'm going to have to start calling you 'manturd' in honor of your banned buddy.
It's too bad your baked boy Gary Johnson won't be running the show for the next eight years.
@)
I don't think it's lazy at all, considering he has already started softening on some of of his campaign promises.
Hah, Vit actually predicted that you'd start calling me some variation of Vit. Looks like he was correct with "manturd". Talk about lazy and predictable.
As I have said multiple times, I didn't vote for Gary Johnson. I know that won't stop you from lying, though. I forget that lying is like breathing to you.
"Softening his campaign promises..."
Because "LOCK HER UP!" was an official Trump campaign promise face)(*^%
Good one, Mantis, good one.
Why is it that when I hurt your feelings you lie and try to insult me with meaningless crap like fence-sitting and Gary Johnson? It's kind of sad for a grown man.
Do you want to have an actual conversation about Trump or would you rather repeatedly bring up a guy that I didn't vote for and got less than 5% of the vote? Your call.
Not annoying at all, somethings never get old. Anyhow, back on topic, it'sThis doesn't even make sense in this conversation.
I know Dave's your buddy, but it has to be somewhat annoying for him to see you wear out his jokes. Maybe one day you'll have an original thought. For your sake, I hope so.
Not annoying at all, somethings never get old. Anyhow, back on topic, it's
not the Presidents job to prosecute that's the job of the AG. If Sessions
decides that laws have been broken by Clinton than she should be indicted.
I would hope that Trump, unlike Obama, will stay above the fray and concentrate
on getting the country headed in the right direction. There's a yuge mess to fix
and I'm confident Trump is up to the task.
P.S. If you've decided to become the poli forum shit stirrer I say have at it, just
try to not be redundant.
Candidate Trump - "If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation, because there has never been so many lies, so much deception. There has never been anything like it, and we're going to have a special prosecutor."
President-elect Trump - I want to move forward, I don't want to move back. And I don't want to hurt the Clintons. I really don't. She went through a lot. And suffered greatly in many different ways. And I am not looking to hurt them at all," "It's just not something that I feel very strongly about."
Its not up to Trump its up to the attorney general....My opinion is Hillary Clinton not above the law....Maybe an ankle bracelet & raid theyre Ill gotton gains & leave them as broke as they were when they stole the furniture out of the whitehouse....Look out Arkansas the clintons are moving back...