fair enough Joe. In retrospect, do you feel he's the best equipped to knock off Clinton? ( It's all about WINNING. All else is noise )
do you feel Kasich is a 'pussy'?
do you think the Clinton machine wanted Trump the most? I'm leaning yes to that now, given the magical appearance of this tape which appears to have had a significant effect on polling/betting lines . I mean, why wasn't that tape released in Jan 2016? .........I feel like a conspiracy nutter,
do you feel Kasich is a 'pussy'?
do you think the Clinton machine wanted Trump the most? I'm leaning yes to that now, given the magical appearance of this tape which appears to have had a significant effect on polling/betting lines . I mean, why wasn't that tape released in Jan 2016? .........I feel like a conspiracy nutter,
Here are the top 5 ways Democrats have refused to accept the legitimacy of the 2000 election:
1. Al Gore’s Recounts and Lawsuits: Of course, this list could be started nowhere else. Liberal partisans are currently in the grip of a nationwide mass delusion that Gore calmly accepted the results of the agonizingly tight presidential election, then passively waited for the results of an automatic mandatory recount before making his concession final. Nothing could be further from the truth.
It’s true that an important difference with Trump was that Gore didn’t challenge the validity of the election in advance. (Then again, he didn’t have widespread stories of voter fraud, illegal coordination between Super PACs and political campaigns, and activists caught bragging about how they engineered political violence to mull over.)
But once that razor’s-edge election was over, Gore retracted his concession and demanded recounts of only a few specific Florida counties, not the entire state. There was a mandatory machine recount of Florida votes, but Gore refused to accept it.
Gore’s reluctance to swiftly demand a manual statewide recount, instead of just the counties where he thought friendly election officials could manufacture a victory for him, was criticized as a major strategic error by legal experts at the time.
Liberal history revisionists are hoping everyone will forget this, but Gore’s strategy involved literally conjuring votes out of thin air – he was looking for “undervotes,” claiming that ballots where no one was chosen for President would be counted as Gore votes, in the Democrat counties of Broward, Dade, Palm Beach, and Volusia.
Gore dragged the entire country through an agonizing legal nightmare for over a month, causing a significant delay in the Bush Administration’s ability to get established in 2001… a year in which history, and Bill Clinton’s feckless foreign policy, would give Bush a very busy September.
Throughout this process, Gore’s constant refrain was that he wanted “every vote to be counted,” which insinuated Bush was a villain who wanted to disenfranchise people, particularly black people. In a December 2000 update on the recount drama, the New York Times reported that Gore’s team “wanted to assess the reaction from its allies and see whether an outcry, particularly by black voters, might trigger enough public concern” to sustain his refusal to concede the election.
Gore fought like mad against his election lost, pulling out every trick in the book, and he kept going even after prominent Democrats began warning him that his resistance was damaging the integrity of the American election system — several of them are quoted to that effect in the New York Times article linked above.
When Al Gore appeared at a Hillary Clinton rally in Miami just last week, he mused darkly about “what happened here in Florida” and got the desired angry result from the crowd of Democrats, which ended up chanting “You won! You won!” — accompanied by an approving nod from Hillary Clinton. Gore finished up by encouraging his audience to vote so that one day, in the years to come, they wouldn’t be welcoming Hillary Clinton onstage and saying “actually you did win, it just wasn’t close enough to make sure that the votes were counted.”
Sorry, Democrat propagandists, but Al Gore has never accepted the 2000 election as fully legitimate, not to this very day. Articles challenging the legitimacy of that election remain a staple of mainstream liberal publications.
2. The War on Katherine Harris: Think Trump was out of line for calling Hillary Clinton a “nasty woman” in the third 2016 debate? That’s nothing compared to the all-out misogynist war our tolerant and sensitive liberal friends waged against Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris in 2000. Her appearance, and especially her use of makeup, were relentlessly mocked. Try this on for size:
Her lips were overdrawn with berry-red lipstick — the creamy sort that smears all over a coffee cup and leaves smudges on shirt collars. Her skin had been plastered and powdered . . . . Caterpillars seemed to rise and fall with every bat of her eyelid. . . . Her mouth is a jagged edge. One of the reasons Harris is so easy to mock is because she, to be honest, seems to have applied her makeup with a trowel.
That’s not some foaming-at-the-mouth lefty blogger – that description of Harris was written by a Washington Post reporter, for the express purpose of justifying even more savage sexist attacks on Harris.
Women’s News racked up a few more of the insults directed at Harris in 2000:
A Democratic operative labeled her Cruella de Vil, the villainess of “102 Dalmatians,” and the term got repeated everywhere. The Boston Globe said maybe she was planning to unwind at a drag bar, because of all her makeup, and the Boston Herald called her a painted lady. Jay Leno called the election “tighter than Katherine Harris’ face.”
They also tried slut-shaming her by mocking the cleavage she displayed in TV appearances, to deafening silence from “feminists.”
Gore and his team attacked Harris professionally while Democrat minions were tearing her to shreds on a personal level. “Gore’s advisers have accused Harris, a Republican and a Bush supporter, of trying to hand the election to George W. Bush,” ABC News reported in November 2000.
Gore spokesman Mark Fabiani bluntly declared, “Ms. Harris’ attempt to steal this election will never stand.” How’s that for assaulting the integrity of the U.S. election system, Clinton fans?
3. Hillary Clinton Thinks Bush Was “Selected, Not Elected”: While we’re on the subject of Hillary Clinton, she’s done a lot more than just nod along with Al Gore’s “I wuz robbed” schtick.
Senator Clinton literally said Bush was “selected, not elected” at a 2002 fundraiser. When she was Secretary of State, she questioned the legitimacy of Bush’s election in a speech overseas:
Now, our democracy is still evolving. We had all kinds of problems in some of our past elections, as you might remember. In 2000, our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state, so I mean, we have our problems too. But we have been moving to try to remedy those problems as we see them.
Her audience would have found nothing subtle about her “brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state” insinuation, given that she was speaking in Nigeria at the time.
Clinton even peddled her Bush-Gore conspiracy theories right on the stage of this year’s Democratic primary debates, when she declared, “A court took away a presidency. Now we’ve got the Republican Congress trying to take away the Constitution, and we should not tolerate that.” CNN actually fact-checked this outburst and rated it “False.”
4. The Butterfly (Ballot) Effect: One of the Democrats’ strategies for overturning the 2000 election was to claim that the “butterfly ballot” in Palm Beach County was too confusing for any reasonable person to figure out, causing many confused Gore voters to incorrectly cast their ballots for Reform Party candidate Pat Buchanan.
The liberal outrage machine was gearing up to portray this as an evil conspiracy to disenfranchise the befuddled Democrat voters of Palm Beach, but were brought up short by the discovery that the butterfly ballot was designed by a Democrat, elections supervisor Theresa LePore, who said she used a two-page layout so the type would be larger and easier to read. LePore nevertheless became the target of fury from Democrats in her area and was voted out of her office in 2004.
The butterfly ballot has figured in attempts to delegitimize the 2000 election ever since it was held. For example, Florida Congressman Rob Wexler declared, “I think it’s fair to say Theresa LePore’s mistake resulted in the wrong man becoming President.”
Wexler was one of several Democrat heavyweights to work for LePore’s defeat in 2004; others included Gore’s running mate Joe Lieberman and another Democrat presidential contender, Vermont Governor Howard Dean. Her opponent, Arthur Anderson, said he ran to defend “the right to have our vote count.”
5. Disenfranchised Minority Voters: Racial conspiracies have long been a mainstay of Democrat assaults on the legitimacy of the 2000 election. Among the most persistent of these beliefs is that Florida police officers used roadblocks to keep black voters away from the polls. This wasn’t just fever-swamp muttering from the far Left — Florida Governor Jeb Bush was actually brought before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission to testify on the subject. Liberals ignored his testimony and continued to insist sinister forces denied minority voters in Florida their chance to elect Al Gore.
Conspiracy theories about sinister voter-roll purges abound. The butterfly ballot and Gore’s thwarted recount antics have been portrayed as racist conspiracies against blacks and Hispanics.
Liberals have often referred to Bush’s election as a “coup” over the years. Among the most energetic users of the term was Rev. Jesse Jackson. For example, he said the Supreme Court was a “willing tool of the Bush campaign,” which “orchestrated a questionable velvet legal coup.” Jackson couched this charge in racialist terms and called for “massive non-violent demonstrations” on the Martin Luther King holiday in 2001.
Jackson also called for the Justice Department to investigate the Florida vote, declaring “there is widespread disgrace across the state,” not just in the dangling-chad precincts of West Palm Beach.
“This last vote caused a crisis in the credibility of this election. This is a crisis of integrity. We the American people deserve better. We should settle for nothing less,” Jackson thundered. “Florida is the Sunshine State. This ballot came out of the Bushes.”
Al Sharpton has played this game as well. Running his own political campaign in 2003, he said that in 2000, “Bush won the election at the Supreme Court, not in the electorate, but the reason he was able to do that is because there is no Constitutional right to vote.”
fair enough Joe. In retrospect, do you feel he's the best equipped to knock off Clinton? ( It's all about WINNING. All else is noise )
do you feel Kasich is a 'pussy'?
do you think the Clinton machine wanted Trump the most? I'm leaning yes to that now, given the magical appearance of this tape which appears to have had a significant effect on polling/betting lines . I mean, why wasn't that tape released in Jan 2016? .........I feel like a conspiracy nutter,
No, I wanted "smartest man in the room" Ted Cruz.
fair enough Joe. In retrospect, do you feel he's the best equipped to knock off Clinton? ( It's all about WINNING. All else is noise )
do you feel Kasich is a 'pussy'?
do you think the Clinton machine wanted Trump the most? I'm leaning yes to that now, given the magical appearance of this tape which appears to have had a significant effect on polling/betting lines . I mean, why wasn't that tape released in Jan 2016? .........I feel like a conspiracy nutter,
Obviously they wanted Trump the most. Why do you think the media gave his primary reality show nonstop coverage for 7 straight months?
The #1 reason is the most obvious and that is money. Having a celebrity in the race was a yuuuuuuuuuuge cash cow for all networks.
But #2 was because they felt he was an easier out than the others.
Trump won because he was an outsider. For years we all have heard of a third party coming in and cleaning house. Well here it is.....probably not in the form many had hoped for.....but its the first movement ever to move out the establishment for their corrupt ways. Whats funny is many of those "liberty" style voters now have a chance to back up what they have been yapping about, and they hide off in a corner.
I don't really think it is a conspiracy. I don't even think it is all that coordinated. It's just a large group of people with more or less the same goal doing exactly the same thing.
Dollars makes sense and Trump certainly has reinvigorated a dying platform like cable news for the last 15 months.
The fact he was going to be easier to pick apart than the Saints secondary was just a cherry on top.
Dollars makes sense and Trump certainly has reinvigorated a dying platform like cable news for the last 15 months.
The fact he was going to be easier to pick apart than the Saints secondary was just a cherry on top.
With a complete absence of Violence in The Streets in response the Black Lives Matter Idiocy & Looting, Burning of cars and assault of innocent passerby White People by Black Thugs doing what it is that soul-less subhuman pieces of shit do you want to assert that there might be Violence in The Streets in response to a Presidential Vote?!!?
C'mon Man!!!
Millennials, yes, they'd take to the streets were Trump to Win but that would be due to a desire to Attention Whore, film themselves being Revolutionaries on their phones to post to social media, the only Violence that would happen: them putting some serious Hurt on a Pumpkin Latte.
What came to pass as result of a "Concession" after a transparently false and stolen election in 2000?
Fuckin' Armageddon Jihad, 9/11, the destruction of Iraq, destabilization of the Middle East and more thats the direct and primary reason we are living with the serious danger that surrounds us and has cost so many lives, unleashed terror across the globe, may even lead to the death of Sweden?
"Concession" in 2000 sealed a fate for us that has proven to be, as many predicted, horrific Book of Revelations-like.
Concession to Improper (yes, very Bannana Republic-like) Election very -EV here with Hillary the punishment.
Objection our DUTY, objection to a Government gone out of control.
"Violence in The Streets" lmfao. Come up with a better reason for why we need to just Lay Down Again and just accept a repeat of that 2000, Hanging Chads, Kathleen Harris, Jeb Bush ridiculous see-thru obvious Election Theft Coup...
...so that We can venture even further down into The Abyss, cuz fear of "Violence in The Streets" is an absurd completely unrealistic "fear".
And, once again, you fully KNOW THIS.
You be like: "Yeah, they're prolly Vacant enuff to Buy that Violence in the Streets might happen".
I think its not that ^^^ but that you lack another reason to object to a refusal to Concede, same as The MSM...going on and on about how dangerous questioning Election could be.
Bullshit and you all know this. More Dangerous to NOT question an obviously rigged election such as this one already is (Media, Paid Violence at Trump Rallies. etc), Florida 2000 + what came as result of THAT stolen election = Impossible to debate that it is not the duty of a true Patriot to Question.
So few Patriots left though....understandably so cuz damn hard to have real Pride in a country that is now mostly Whining Millennials, Whining Blacks, White Folks down with concern for MONEY and thats all and Corrupt Politicians sucking at the teet of Satan.
"Violence in The Streets" though lmfao.....yeah THATS why we should never ever Question anything ever, cuz there might be "unrest"...
...time for that was to hit back hard immediately against BLM/Rioting, we don't rise up against Niggers destroying shit in our streets and we're gonna rise up for anything?
Bullshit and you know it.
Ya'll chill out within whatever HeadSpace right now you desire but if Truth exists behind the talk that the 33,000 deleted emails of Hillary not just "exist" which is to say are in the hands of someone but are fixin' to be released then this thing is far from over.
Story is a lower level employee of NSA "Rogue", like, without orders to do so Hacked Hillary's server due to his own pissed-off-ness that any Sec of State would be so stupid + from a concern for National Security standpoint he was concerned PLUS He did wanna see what was in there cuz, thats kinda the whole role of NSA....to know stuff.
"NSA" maybe not the Agency this guy was with, could have been one of the other big ones, this story has holes right now, the largest Hole = whether there is any Truth to an ability to make Public Hillary's deleted emails, of course, biggest Hole that but if those CAN be OUTED...
....potential Trainwreck Disaster that could even cause a Delay of the NOV. 8 Vote?
And an extension of Obama Presidency?
Voila?!!??
Story is a lower level employee of NSA "Rogue", like, without orders to do so Hacked Hillary's server due to his own pissed-off-ness that any Sec of State would be so stupid + from a concern for National Security standpoint he was concerned PLUS He did wanna see what was in there cuz, thats kinda the whole role of NSA....to know stuff.
"NSA" maybe not the Agency this guy was with, could have been one of the other big ones, this story has holes right now, the largest Hole = whether there is any Truth to an ability to make Public Hillary's deleted emails, of course, biggest Hole that but if those CAN be OUTED...
....potential Trainwreck Disaster that could even cause a Delay of the NOV. 8 Vote?
And an extension of Obama Presidency?
Voila?!!??
'Obviously they wanted Trump the most. Why do you think the media gave his primary reality show nonstop coverage for 7 straight months?'
dunno....that line gets you a room with a window...........................................................they gave me two windows............and a few orchids.....
