The fake Religious, Racist, Muslim hating, Hypocritical, sick stalker of course lying once again, as he does constantly. I took Obama to task countless times, when he did things I disagreed with. But this racist piece of trash, along with many of his ilk, cannot do the same with the Idiot Drumpf. They lack the integrity to do so.
Some nice reading material for you. Here's a brilliant thread I created that shows all the statistics (including a BBC study) that show's how an estimated 1/2 the worlds Muslim population suffers from the effects of thousands of years of inbreeding. It'll probably cause your libtard head to explode.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1080802
Here you go Guesser:
According to Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Muslim inbreeding, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred:
Sennels points out that cousin marriage was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
Sennels warns that massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]pool, including extensive damage to Muslims’ intelligence, sanity, and health. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)[/COLOR]
Below are the consequences of inbreeding:
1. Birth and birth defects:
2. Physical and mental retardation and illnesses:
All of which would explain the following phenomena among Muslims ([COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]Source: Nicolai Sennels):[/COLOR]
Muslims’ average lower IQ means a lowered ability to enjoy and [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]produce knowledge and abstract thinking, which would explain why:[/COLOR]
Sennels concludes:
The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.
The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “Islamophobe” and a “racist.”
A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred against Muslim people.
But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects….
Let us keep in mind that Muslims are the first — though maybe not the biggest — victims of Islam….
In fact, it is the Left’s callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes who is truly “anti-Muslim.”
According to Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Muslim inbreeding, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred:
- 70% of Pakistanis are inbred.
- 67% of Saudi Arabians are inbred.
- 64% of those living in Jordan and Kuwait are inbred.
- 63% of Sudanese are inbred.
- 60% of Iraqis are inbred.
- 54% of Muslims in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are inbred.
- 25-30% of those in Turkey are inbred.
- In England, at least 55% of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.
- In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
Sennels points out that cousin marriage was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
Sennels warns that massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]pool, including extensive damage to Muslims’ intelligence, sanity, and health. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)[/COLOR]
Below are the consequences of inbreeding:
1. Birth and birth defects:
- 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.
- 50% increase in the risk that the child dies during labor.
- The risk of autosomal recessive genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher.
- The risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
2. Physical and mental retardation and illnesses:
- The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.
- The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness, i.e., insanity.
- Social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]seizures[/COLOR], oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.”
- Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by 400% among children of cousin marriages.
All of which would explain the following phenomena among Muslims ([COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]Source: Nicolai Sennels):[/COLOR]
- 1 out of every 3 Somalis are mentally ill.
- More than 40% of the patients in Denmark‘s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant (i.e., Muslim) background.
- One-third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a “foreign” (i.e., Muslim) background.
- In Denmark, psychologist Sennels’ native country, “non-Western” immigrants (who are mainly Muslim) are more than 300% more likely to fail the [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]intelligence test[/COLOR] required for entrance into the Danish army.
- In Denmark, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education.
- 64% of school children with Arabic parents in Denmark are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
- The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”
Muslims’ average lower IQ means a lowered ability to enjoy and [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]produce knowledge and abstract thinking, which would explain why:[/COLOR]
- The [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]Arab world[/COLOR] translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does. In the last 1,200 years years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year.
- 7 out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
- Only 9 Muslims had ever won the Nobel Prize, and 5 of those 9 were for the “Peace Prize.”
- According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10% of the world average when it comes to scientific research ([COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]measured[/COLOR] by articles per million [COLOR=#1B8EDE !important]inhabitants[/COLOR]).
Sennels concludes:
The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.
The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “Islamophobe” and a “racist.”
A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred against Muslim people.
But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects….
Let us keep in mind that Muslims are the first — though maybe not the biggest — victims of Islam….
In fact, it is the Left’s callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes who is truly “anti-Muslim.”
No surprise this sick, fake Religious, racist, Hypocritical fascist is now promoting Nazi Style Racial purity writers. It's who he is.
Nicolai Sennels’ Nazi Style Propaganda - update 2/17/13
Sheila Musaji
Posted Feb 7, 2013 •Permalink • Printer-Friendly Version Bookmark and Share
Nicolai Sennels’ Nazi Style Propaganda
by Sheila Musaji
Nicolai Sennels is very popular with the Islamophobia echo chamber. His articles on Muslim inbreeding, mental deficiencies, etc. sound exactly like the Nazi eugenics theories. Here are a few members of the echo chamber who have promoted his “scholarly work”:
Robert Spencer published an article titled “Denmark: Muslim cousin marriages fills schools for retarded” [sic] on his Jihad Watch site. The brief article is by Sennels, and says it was “posted by Nicolai Sennels”. Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist with a history of anti-Muslim polemics. He has written numerous articles all disparaging Islam or Muslims. His work is posted on such disreputable sites as Jihad Watch, Death to Islam, Front Page magazine, Gates of Vienna, Pamela Geller’s Atlas Shrugs, etc. He is not published on any reputable sites. This is the sort of “scholar” that the Islamophobes are forced to resort to in order to continue fomenting anti-Muslim hatred. The use of the derogatory word “retarded” for people with intellectual disabilities in the title is in itself problematic.
Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association wrote an incredibly bigoted article coming to the conclusion that American Muslims should be deported. In the article Fischer discusses a book by Nicolai Sennel and Sennel’s conclusions which Fischer says he agrees with. “His [Sennel’s] sobering conclusion, with which I agree: the integration of Muslims into Western societies is “impossible.”
Sennels did an interview with Front Page Magazine in which he posits that “The unusual thing about my work is that I found out that my Muslim clients had certain psychological characteristics that my non-Muslim – mostly Danish – clients did not have.” Just being raised in a Muslim home causes problems according to Sennels one significant conclusion was that having been raised in a Muslim environment – with Muslim parents and traditions – includes the risk of developing certain antisocial patterns. Read the interview and see if you find anything that is much different from Nazi ideas about the “mental deficiencies” of Jews. Disgusting and hateful bigotry.
Bonni at Bare Naked Islam published It’s the Muslim inbreeding, stupid! in which she introduces Sennels theory with the statement “Shhhhh, we’re not supposed to talk about the reason for the high rate of the mental illness in the Muslim world.” She goes on to say “The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%.”
Nicolai Sennels has said: Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1.400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool. The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring’s intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings
It is true that some cultures within the Muslim community, as well as other non-Muslim communities, face the daunting task of educating its members about the dangers of the practice of cousin marriages. Whether is is isolated or small, social, cultural, or religious groups who want to marry from “among their own”, there are many places right here in the good old U.S. where this problem plays out. The Amish would be only one of numerous examples. In some areas of Appalachia this is also an issue or there wouldn’t be songs like “I’m my own grandpa”. There is a problem that needs a solution (primarily education), but the solution does not require demonizing, denigrating, or de-humanizing people.
What is most curious about the Islamophobes promoting Sennels and his racist theories dehumanizing Muslims is that they constantly say that “Islam is not a race, it is an ideology”. If Muslims are not part of a race, then how can any of these theories be generalized to the large category of “Muslims” in the aggregate.
SOME BACKGROUND ON SENNELS
Anna Eckstron wrote an article Why Euro-populists see Jews as traitors in the Jewish Chronicle. Here is what she said about propogandists like Sennels
A further narrative that drives populist European racism is propagated by figures such as Thilo Sarrazin, author of the Deutschland schafft sich ab, and psychologist and Danish People’s Party politician Nicolai Sennels. For Sennels, Muslims are inbred and therefore a race whose gene pool gives rise to criminal behaviour and welfare abuse. Together with the mentally handicapped, whom the Sweden Democrats want to send to distant institutions; young delinquents and their families, whom Wilders wishes to place in camps; and the Roma and other “aliens”, the Muslims are believed to contaminate the pure people.
Northern European populists initially exempted the Jews from these xenophobic and racist theories because they have an idolised image of Israel as a mono-ethnic, anti-Islam bloc and, second, because they have identified with European victims of Muslim antisemitism. Furthermore, Jews have been, and still are, useful weapons against Muslims and elites.
For these weapons to be effective, however, the Jews have to play their part. But most Jews have not turned populist.
Anger over this perceived betrayal is now evident in populist rhetoric. Frequently one hears the accusation that the “establishment Jews” defend “their” nation while trying to destroy “ours” via the media and their political influence. For instance, Kent Ekeroth, MP and international secretary for the Sweden Democrats, says: “The Jewish groups here are ultraliberal… They defend multiculturalism and mass immigration because they think it protects them. If you behave like that you alienate the nationalist parties - and then you are left without friends.”
In this way, a utopian Israel is used as a stick to beat European Jewry. This, of course, is the same “racist” image of Israel that leftist and Islamist groups use in their offensives against Jewry.
The tendency is, I believe, only the beginning of a synthesis of racisms within a growing populist movement.
Here is a Media Matters report on Sennels and his “research”
It will probably come as no surprise that Sennels has a long history of extreme anti-Muslim rhetoric. In a May 2010 interview, Sennels told online conservative magazine FrontPageMag that he is “completely convinced that Muslim integration will never happen to the necessary extent” and called for “the Western world ... to put a complete halt to Muslim immigration and non-Western immigrants who did not already receive a citizenship.” In a July 2010 open letter to British Prime Minister David Cameron concerning Turkey’s campaign for EU membership, Sennels exhorted Cameron to “study the Quran” so he could learn that “t is a criminal book that forces people to do criminal things.” A gushing April 2010 interview with Sennels on Rightly Concerned, a blog run by the American Family Association, included these quotes:
The Danes spend 300,000 euros ($400,000 U.S.) a year on social problems created by Muslim immigrants. It would be a far better use of those funds, [Sennels] argues, to use them to send Muslim immigrants back to countries which share their fundamental values, where perhaps they can serve as ambassadors for more free and democratic societies in their countries of origin by taking with them some of the ideas and ideals they observed in the West.
[...] [Sennels] concludes that Muslim criminality is caused by Islam or “Muslim culture” rather than by social problems in the countries to which they immigrate.
[...] [Another] myth he explodes is that it is poverty among immigrants which leads to social problems. In reality, he says, it’s exactly the reverse. It is the social problems they create for themselves that lead to poverty. He discovered that among most Muslims there is a “very low focus on supporting one’s children in school and on one’s own education,” and a lack of motivation for creating a professional career. All this combines to produce endemic poverty among Muslim immigrants. In a word, what is missing is the Protestant work ethic. And that is because, well, they’re not Protestants. [Rightly Concerned, action.afa.net, 04/08/10]
The issue of the prevalence of cousin marriages in some Muslim communities is one that Muslims are well-aware of, It is an issue that needs to be addressed, but exploiting that issue to advance a bigoted agenda will not aid in addressing the problem.
In 2008, we published the following article on The American Muslim (TAM) Cousin Marriages and Congenital Defects by Mohammed Asmal, MD-PhD:
Taken at face value, the recent statement by British Minister Woolas about the worrisome rate of congenital defects in British Pakistani newborns and its association with the practice of cousin marriage would seem to be a statement of concern for the public health of his constituents. Unfortunately in today’s climate of escalating inter-religious tension, the statement has been misinterpreted by some as “Islamophobia”, while being used by others as ammunition for Muslim-bashing.
The knee-jerk over-reaction of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee to label MP Woolas an Islamophobe does not do justice to the intent of the MP’s statment. Even worse, however, the Sunday Times provocative headline: “Inbred Muslimsdeforming births”, grossly distorts Mr. Woolas’ words, re-framing a legitimate public health discussion into a racist indictment against an already alienated community.
Let’s take a step back, and look at the way words have been twisted to change a potentially productive dialogue into a highly confrontational one. Consanguinity refers to procreation between blood relatives. The term “inbreeding”—which is not used by the MP, but was emblazoned across the Sunday Times—is used in animal husbandry and animal laboratories, and is highly offensive when used to describe human beings.
Consanguinous marriage is hardly unique to Pakistani Muslims. The MP never appears to have implied that. It is practiced among people of South Asian descent belonging to other religions as well. It has been practiced widely in the past, and still to some extent, among other cloistered religious communities, such as Mormons and the Hasidic Jews. There is little dispute in the medical community that consanguinity is associated with an increased risk for hereditary disorders. The adverse effects of consanguinity have perhaps best been studied amongst Ashkenazi Jews, accounting for the almost unique occurrence of many lethal childhood diseases such as Tay-Sachs and Niemann Pick Disease, as well as the greatly increased occurrence of adult diseases such as hereditary breast cancer associated with the BRCA mutation, in this population. Historically, European royal families have provided us with perhaps the best examples of the dangers of consanguinity in the mental retardation of the Hapsburg’s and the hemophilia of the Russian czars.
Even if there is accumulating evidence, as the MP states, that rates of congenital defects in children of consanguinous Pakistanis are disproportionately high, and educational measures are undertaken to discourage the practice of inter-cousin marriage, the public health impact of ending consanguinous marriage in the British Pakistani community would be minuscule compared to the impact of an anti-smoking campaign, a legal ban on indoor smoking, restrictions placed on alcohol sales in pubs, or a campaign to eliminate images of graphic sex or violence from juvenile-accessible media.
Discouraging inter-cousin marriage would be to the advantage of the Pakistani community for its own long term health. However, only the most boorish of racists would use the tragedy of congenital birth defects for political gain.
UPDATE 2/17/2013
Robert Spencer is still pushing this hateful racist propaganda. He has just posted an interview he did with Sennels on the psychology of Islam and Muslims.
Recently, Dr. Faheem Younus published Why ban cousin marriages in America? in which he noted:
Cousin marriages – while common in Muslim societies – are a big taboo in the US. In fact, 25 US states actually ban such marriages. And the Muslim youth, inadvertently, is buying into this idea.
On the contrary, acceptance for same-sex marriage is gaining such popularity that President Obama invoked gay rights in his inaugural address. My advice; never go to a barber shop in America while you are still mulling over such controversial topics because your mind may sputter a question like,
“Why do we smother the discussion on the topic of first cousin marriages?”
And you may get a response like,
“Well, you don’t have to be an Einstein to know that incestuous relationships lead to diseases in the babies.”
This actually happened to me last week.
In one succinct sentence, my barber spelled out the three oft repeated reasons to justify banning cousin marriages. That they cause diseases, that they are incestuous, and that banning such marriages is a no-brainer.
But there is only one problem; all three reasons should be debunked.
Let’s be clear. I don’t intent to promote cousin marriages, but when a free society supports a ban on such marriages, somebody’s got to question it.
I believe the “Disease-Incest-Einstein” line of American reasoning to ban such marriages is flawed and should be rebutted. So let’s confront them one by one.
Disease:
The risk of birth defects in children born to first cousins is increased from a baseline of 3-4 percent to 4-7 percent according to the National Society of Genetic Councillors (NSGC). In this modern age, this risk could be mitigated by mandating — as the State of Maine has done — pre-marital genetic testing. The NSGC, however, considers the risk to be so insignificant that it does not recommend additional testing or screening.
But wait. It gets complicated; because the risk of birth defects increases with other scenarios too.
As the maternal age exceeds 35, the incidence of foetal abnormalities creeps up to the 4-7 percent range. Should we also ban such women from having children then?
Hereditary diseases are more prevalent in certain ethnicities; cystic fibrosis in Caucasians, beta thalassemia in Italians, sickle cell in Blacks, phenylketonuria in Irish and Tay-Sachs in Ashkenazi Jews.
Why then, allow these groups to freely marry within the same ethnicity?
Incest:
As you cross the scientific hurdles, you will be confronted with a mountain of taboo cloaked in words like “gross”, “icky”, “yucky”, but where do such taboo feelings originate from? Not a single verse in the Torah, Bible or Quran - books revered by three billion followers of the three Abrahamic religions – prohibits cousin marriage, which were common in Jewish, Christian and Islamic history.
The Bible even mentions various accounts of cousin marriages, such as Jacob and Rachel, Milcah and Nahor, and Jacob and Leah, in the book of Genesis. And please don’t quote the incest prohibitions listed in Leviticus 18. It never mentions first cousins.
Granted, the fact that something is “allowed” does not always mean that it is socially accepted. So if you still feel grossed out by the thought of marrying your cousin, that’s ok.
Hold on to your personal feelings; why impose them on others?
Einstein:
This is the ultimate argument made in support of banning cousin marriages. It’s so obviously wrong that “you don’t have to be an Einstein to figure it out”.
In the evidence driven societies, we have a different word to describe such claims; myth.
Myths are best broken by data. The fact that 20 percent of global marriages take place between first cousins and most societies, including Europe and Canada, consider cousin marriages to be legal should give us a pause.
Muslim Americans have not taken a strong position on this issue. The youth politely decline the option of marrying their cousin and those who may have married their cousins, don’t talk about the fact as if it were a crime.
After I published this piece, a friend – who married his cousin and lives in Texas – tweeted;
“Apparently I am a felon as per the Texas penal code.”
I have learnt my lesson.
America has no appetite to have a rational conversation over the topic of cousin marriages. And I am certainly not having this discussion in the barber shop again. Because after all the research for this article, I realised that actually, you have to be an Einstein in order to believe that there is nothing wrong with cousin marriages.
Why?
Because in 1919 Albert Einstein married Elsa Löwenthal – his first cousin.
Actually it's not. I've met posters off this board Guesser and we've had some good times. I'm not the one that's posted PM's on the board.
The bottom line is often times you struggle in dealing with basic facts and when challenged, your answer is to say "there's a pattern" or "it's your opinion" or whatever.
In this instance, the there is no anti-Semitic rhetoric in any way in the Twitter exchange in post #140. I've asked you to show me specifically in that exchange what you see and you can't. Your answer? "I see a pattern." Some of us deal in absolutes. It's ok if you deal in possibilities as long as you can just show a bit of transparency and say it out loud.
Nope, a holocaust statement that was a clear sign of Anti Semitism, since they actively omitted the words Jew from the remembrance text, like Holocaust Deniers do. Obama, W, Clinton, include the Word Jew when they made such statements, Holocaust deniers like Ahmadinejad and Drumpf don't. Maybe someday you'll come up with the balls and integrity to call it what it is, instead of trying to fit in with the sick Idiot Drumpf supporters.
More Anti Semitism and Holocaust Denial by the Disgraceful Idiot Drumpf Administration, in what continues to be a pattern. No surprise nary of a Peep of it at the Rx.
Anne Frank Center calls for Spicer to be fired
BY REBECCA SAVRANSKY - 04/11/17 03:24 PM EDT<article class="node-328320 node node-article view-mode-full clearfix" about="/homenews/administration/328320-anne-frank-center-calls-for-spicer-to-be-fired" typeof="sioc:Item foaf
ocument" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
The Anne Frank Center is calling for White House press secretary Sean Spicer to be fired after his Tuesday comments claiming Adolf Hitler did not use chemical weapons during World War II.
In a statement posted on Facebook, the center's executive director blasted Spicer, saying the White House spokesman "lacks the integrity" to serve in his post.
"On Passover no less, Sean Spicer has engaged in Holocaust denial, the most offensive form of fake news imaginable, by denying Hitler gassed millions of Jews to death," Steven Goldstein said in a statement.
"Spicer's statement is the most evil slur upon a group of people we have ever heard from a White House press secretary."
He added: "President Trump must fire him at once."
During Tuesday's press briefing, Spicer referenced Hitler while talking about Syrian President Bashar Assad and the recent chemical strike in Syria that prompted a military response from the U.S.
"You had someone as despicable as Hitler, who didn't even sink to using chemical weapons," Spicer said.
Hitler is known to have used cyanide gas in mass murders of Jews.
Later in the briefing, Spicer was asked to clarify his comments.
“When it comes to sarin gas, [Hitler] was not using the gas on his own people the same way that Assad is doing,” Spicer said during his follow-up.
“I understand your point. Thank you. I appreciate that. He brought them into the Holocaust centers, I understand that. I was saying in the way that Assad used them where he went into town, dropped them into the middle of town. I appreciate the clarification. That was not the intent.”
Following the briefing, Spicer released a further statement saying he wasn't trying to "lessen the horrendous nature of the Holocaust."
"However, I was trying to draw a contrast of the tactic of using airplanes to drop chemical weapons on innocent people," he said in the statement.
</article>
Anne Frank Center calls for Spicer to be fired
BY REBECCA SAVRANSKY - 04/11/17 03:24 PM EDT<article class="node-328320 node node-article view-mode-full clearfix" about="/homenews/administration/328320-anne-frank-center-calls-for-spicer-to-be-fired" typeof="sioc:Item foaf
ocument" style="box-sizing: border-box;">The Anne Frank Center is calling for White House press secretary Sean Spicer to be fired after his Tuesday comments claiming Adolf Hitler did not use chemical weapons during World War II.
In a statement posted on Facebook, the center's executive director blasted Spicer, saying the White House spokesman "lacks the integrity" to serve in his post.
"On Passover no less, Sean Spicer has engaged in Holocaust denial, the most offensive form of fake news imaginable, by denying Hitler gassed millions of Jews to death," Steven Goldstein said in a statement.
"Spicer's statement is the most evil slur upon a group of people we have ever heard from a White House press secretary."
He added: "President Trump must fire him at once."
During Tuesday's press briefing, Spicer referenced Hitler while talking about Syrian President Bashar Assad and the recent chemical strike in Syria that prompted a military response from the U.S.
"You had someone as despicable as Hitler, who didn't even sink to using chemical weapons," Spicer said.
Hitler is known to have used cyanide gas in mass murders of Jews.
Later in the briefing, Spicer was asked to clarify his comments.
“When it comes to sarin gas, [Hitler] was not using the gas on his own people the same way that Assad is doing,” Spicer said during his follow-up.
“I understand your point. Thank you. I appreciate that. He brought them into the Holocaust centers, I understand that. I was saying in the way that Assad used them where he went into town, dropped them into the middle of town. I appreciate the clarification. That was not the intent.”
Following the briefing, Spicer released a further statement saying he wasn't trying to "lessen the horrendous nature of the Holocaust."
"However, I was trying to draw a contrast of the tactic of using airplanes to drop chemical weapons on innocent people," he said in the statement.
</article>
More Anti Semitism and Holocaust Denial by the Disgraceful Idiot Drumpf Administration, in what continues to be a pattern. No surprise nary of a Peep of it at the Rx. <article class="node-328320 node node-article view-mode-full clearfix" about="/homenews/administration/328320-anne-frank-center-calls-for-spicer-to-be-fired" typeof="sioc:Item foaf
</article>
There was no "Holocaust denial"
You don't seem to understand what the printed words on the screen actually mean.
You are a total embarrassment.
