+1
I concur. Betting so many plays usually ends up in the negative. Too many for me to bet in a single day.
Yet, this is the Man in the Mirror's protocol. If it's successful for him, great! Good luck! :toast:
There are people that bet 3 plays a day that lose. Your comment isn't based on any facts, its just an assertion.
When you run data analysis, or play games based on profitable situations (systems, angles, etc..)......if your models show a positive ROI, then you want every play that qualifies. If its 17, its 17. Saying betting X amount of plays usually ends up in the negative shows that you don't grasp the concept of win expectations. The other guy saying..."you may as well bet the entire board".... also has no clue.
I can show you people that post 1-3 plays a day, right here on this forum, that have a losing record. I can show you people that play 6 or more plays in a day that show a winning record. I've posted 332 plays in my NBA thread so far, and I'm up 11+ units. My NCAAF thread had 20+ plays on any given Saturday and I won over 33.5 units. 371 plays at 54+%.
It isn't the number of plays, its the quality of those plays. For those that say its too many plays, decrease your unit size. If you are a $100 player, play them for $25. I understand its a lot of bankroll to put out at one time, but you can decrease your unit size and still play along. Looking at his results, I don't know why anyone wouldn't.