Of course i agree, 90% of the coaches would definately pick Cutler. and 90% of the coaches would be wrong. Matter of fact just because you have the luxury of hindsight you make the rookie mistake of omitting one even more important scenario.
98% of coaches would have gone for Leinart. The only exception being Fisher.(and may be..Jack Del rio..Its an AFC south thing i am not going to explain in this reply)
And 98% of those coaches would have been wrong.
Also you guys are the worst. Its amazing how you over look the Jay Cutler prototype QB in Joey Harrington, David CArr, Alex smith some of whom are all jobless right now.
All these QBs would have been picked before VY by 98% of the league.
Again, you pro Cutler guys are neglecting the fact that Cutler has the best weapons of the 3 QBs (leinart and Vy)
He is in the worst division with two of the worst teams
ever in the NFL.
And yet his winning percentage is worse than that of the guy who has absolutely no weapons, and the guy plays in the toughest division in the league.
I need for some one to explain this major hole in your logic.
98% of coaches would have gone for Leinart. The only exception being Fisher.(and may be..Jack Del rio..Its an AFC south thing i am not going to explain in this reply)
And 98% of those coaches would have been wrong.
Also you guys are the worst. Its amazing how you over look the Jay Cutler prototype QB in Joey Harrington, David CArr, Alex smith some of whom are all jobless right now.
All these QBs would have been picked before VY by 98% of the league.
Again, you pro Cutler guys are neglecting the fact that Cutler has the best weapons of the 3 QBs (leinart and Vy)
He is in the worst division with two of the worst teams
ever in the NFL.
And yet his winning percentage is worse than that of the guy who has absolutely no weapons, and the guy plays in the toughest division in the league.
I need for some one to explain this major hole in your logic.