maria,
i actually thought the article was another poor attempt by established newspaper the guerdian and "Richard Dawkins FRS is the Charles Simonyi Professor at Oxford University", aka hired propagandist, to public disorientation. Who the fvck does professor think he it talking to, fools? Bush is not the problem, the u.s. power structure does not depend of bush, actually no one give a fvck about him, he is just a strawman.
"Would you do business with a company that devoted an entire year to little else than the process of choosing its new CEO, from the strongest field in the world, and ended up with Bush? "
That's bullshit, we are not THAT dumb prof, governmental stucture in the us is much unlike a business in its power structure, much unlike.
So, i guess when you blame bush, then it's all fine, change the ceo and it alright again, then how the fvck prof this position of power has been breeding consistently "war hungry" expansionist "ceo"'s?
Let me re-remind myself never to read again any of the guardians/times/posts of the world.
ALSO:
let me repeat:
"things are different after 3 thousand died at the world trade center...."
huh? If things are indeed different then why is u.s. foreign policy identical to what it used to be: Bypassing united nations resolutions and members, bombing other nations...
I mean what the fvck had the u.s. of a. to do with yugoslavia (it'a rhetorical question) and they were bombing this country to the ground for over one and a half month? What the fvck was there, milosevich going to invade them? The official excuse by the so called liberal clinton was that they were bombing it to protect the indigenous peoples (lmao)? They were bombing it to get their people in there and their industry back to pre 19th century so the boys over at general electric etc. could clean up in terms of infrastracture big $$, and the compradore class, and the euro bussinessmen in bed with the americans...
