<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 4520868" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Ibetonsports</TD><TD class=alt2>We should start keeping track of all the arguments these people run from.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
We should. They spit out their FOX NOISE talking points, and we tear them down, and then- dead air. Its pathetic.
A couple months ago Joe C got so frustrated with me he called for an RX wide Fatwa against me. A Fatwa of non-engagement. Joes words were something like this. "I have decided that THE FAR LEFT KOOK MOONBAT LIBERALS SHOULD BE TOTALLY IGNORED. Therefore FROM NOW ON I will not respond to them with return post, and "I advise everyone to do the same." Well when Joe C speaks, his Neo-Wingnut network here listens.
Watch every post I make to Joe C. 9 out of 10 are always ignored, whether they are substantative and thoughtful, or just teeing of on the jackazz, partly out of knowing he "cant respond", and partly to try to get him to.
The accepting accolytes, Base, Wiillie, Bblight, and the rest are more or less towing the line on this, with a few exceptions. They have their marching orders from their Fuhrer, and they try to stick to the script.
I have probably ended more threads based on percentage of no replies against posts made by their side than any one here, and I dont even post that much to begin with, but when I do I put my heart and soul and mind into it, which they have decided they cannot deal with anymore. The day you see Joe C regularly respond to a post by me will mean the Fatwa has ended. Until then they cant beat me by ignoring me, but that is evidently preferable to them then looking ignorant and clueless. Joey and the boys are so comfortable with incompetence they have raised it to an art form by delibrately igoring all of us when they are cornered intellectually, factually, or morally on the issues. Its the equivalent of blathering out their verbal garbage and then cutting off our mikes like O-liar-ly is famous for doing. But hey - if it makes their little fragile egos relax a bit under the pressure, then go for it.
Watch closely from now on you will observe this phenomonen. Oh- They might for a short time start replying just to make it look good, but if you check back on my previous posts, the record speaks for itself.
First they laughed at me. Then they ignored me. Then they got angry with me. Then they stop replying at all.
Then I won.
You new guys make me proud with your hard hitting commentary on the nature of evil in this country and the world today, and where and in who it emanates from. They will never drown you out. You are too dedicated and well informed.
Never stop reminding them you cant ignore the truth.
We should. They spit out their FOX NOISE talking points, and we tear them down, and then- dead air. Its pathetic.
A couple months ago Joe C got so frustrated with me he called for an RX wide Fatwa against me. A Fatwa of non-engagement. Joes words were something like this. "I have decided that THE FAR LEFT KOOK MOONBAT LIBERALS SHOULD BE TOTALLY IGNORED. Therefore FROM NOW ON I will not respond to them with return post, and "I advise everyone to do the same." Well when Joe C speaks, his Neo-Wingnut network here listens.
Watch every post I make to Joe C. 9 out of 10 are always ignored, whether they are substantative and thoughtful, or just teeing of on the jackazz, partly out of knowing he "cant respond", and partly to try to get him to.
The accepting accolytes, Base, Wiillie, Bblight, and the rest are more or less towing the line on this, with a few exceptions. They have their marching orders from their Fuhrer, and they try to stick to the script.
I have probably ended more threads based on percentage of no replies against posts made by their side than any one here, and I dont even post that much to begin with, but when I do I put my heart and soul and mind into it, which they have decided they cannot deal with anymore. The day you see Joe C regularly respond to a post by me will mean the Fatwa has ended. Until then they cant beat me by ignoring me, but that is evidently preferable to them then looking ignorant and clueless. Joey and the boys are so comfortable with incompetence they have raised it to an art form by delibrately igoring all of us when they are cornered intellectually, factually, or morally on the issues. Its the equivalent of blathering out their verbal garbage and then cutting off our mikes like O-liar-ly is famous for doing. But hey - if it makes their little fragile egos relax a bit under the pressure, then go for it.
Watch closely from now on you will observe this phenomonen. Oh- They might for a short time start replying just to make it look good, but if you check back on my previous posts, the record speaks for itself.
First they laughed at me. Then they ignored me. Then they got angry with me. Then they stop replying at all.
Then I won.
You new guys make me proud with your hard hitting commentary on the nature of evil in this country and the world today, and where and in who it emanates from. They will never drown you out. You are too dedicated and well informed.
Never stop reminding them you cant ignore the truth.
If 2-out-of-three of everything is a conspiracy or lies mixed with truth, how do you know when the 1-out-of 3 is? And if MSM is unreliable and can't be trusted, what sources can? The Daily Kos, maybe? What is the end goal of all these evil MSM conspiracies and misleading news and history?
I notice you have not tried to answer the question that I put out there. I'll answer what you have to say though.
You ask how to tell which 1 out of 3 are truthfull. It is as simple as what makes sense. The thing is about your corporate media views, they do not make sense. Maybe it is just a coincidence that in 2000 Saddem started selling oil in Euroes, then 911 happens, then we set up our bases in Afganastan on the line of a proposed pipeline. We basically fully withdrawl out of Afganastan once the pipeline route is secure focusing on our real issue at hand. Pulling Saddem out of power and making Iraq sell oil in US dollars once again. Along with the nice bonus of now having military bases set up nicely to hit Syria and Iran if need be. (more global domination) I guess those tax paid military men and women protecting oil feilds for private corporations is OK in your eyes. There was way too much to gain from 911, and it came at a way too convenient time in history. Operation Northwoods proves our government is not beyond framing other countries for our political end. And Reichstag proves that mad men are willing to do what needs to be done to further their agenda. Not everything is a conspiracy, but when the logic tilts the scale on the side of conspiracy, it would take a sheep not to see it.
What are you basing this on? Reuters and Al Jazeera are out to make money too, last I checked. If you think you are being fed a steady diet of misinformation, what makes you so certain that Reuters and AJ
lolBIG: ) aren't influenced by their own biases as well? Or is it that their biases fit better with you own biases, because that's the feeling I'm getting. It's vitually impossible for any media outlet to not be biased in one way or another.The very non original part comes from what got you to this conclusion. This may be getting too deep for you. The thought pattern that made you reach your thought, that I should install footbaths and by assuming that I'm muslum at all, is a very forcefed mentallity. It does not have to be an acutal suggestion that is stolen for it to be a very pathetic attempt at being a free thinker. By the way, I hate all religions. They are a pathetic attempt at understanding the unknown, death. And they turned into a way to push political agendas as well. They are all tainted and worthless.
And how am I a Dhimmi? You are so comsumed with labels and fitting into an existing frame. It is out of your comprehension to have thought that comes from your own experiences and what you see for yourself. Just because you have to look at a chart to see if it is OK to agree with something does not mean everyone is like that.
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 4521925" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Anti-liberal</TD><TD class=alt2>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Total Recall
Thanks thejdog. Fade the MSM. I like that. If only the books had odds. News event A,B,and C. True or false? 2-1 odds. Fade them all and win 2 out of 3 almost every time!
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
If 2-out-of-three of everything is a conspiracy or lies mixed with truth, how do you know when the 1-out-of 3 is? And if MSM is unreliable and can't be trusted, what sources can? The Daily Kos, maybe? What is the end goal of all these evil MSM conspiracies and misleading news and history?</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Do you really expect to makes points on me using your tired Ad Hominem arguments, which are nothing more than a failed attempt to give your fallacies life and meaning when there is no life and meaning there?
Look, MR ANTI-LIBERAL I could use your name against you by the same token, but these tactics are useless. I read EVERYTHING. I read every right wing site I can, and I read between the lines. Then I take a left turn, read between the lines , and I get the opposing views. Are you following this? Then I actually THINK about both viewpoints! Then I decide what I think the truth is. Im like my own personal 12 man jury. I would never base my opinion on listening to Rush Limbaugh any more than reading the KOS. I would never base my opinion on listening to Alex Jones any more than after reading Ann Coulter. Even though her diatribe is sickenening. I force myself to read it, like a kid being forced to eat spinach, I dutifully consume it. I listen to the States argument. Then I listen to the peoples argument. Both are presumed innocent until I decide whose guilty of the big lie. You, however, seem to have a blind side in always taking side the Prosecution. Why is that. Are you ignorant, necause ignorance is also ignorance of both sides of the case. Dont you know that? You are unprepared and unqualified to even open your mouth in here unless youve reviewed all the evidence, but the word of one man is enough for you. What a genius and wise man it is who sets himself a course such as yours. Have you ever attempted to digest any left wing sites? Or is that like being forced to eat spinach. You need to open your mind and stop letting yourself be compartmentalized. I must have 20-30 sites I access- half right and left so you are a fool to think you can paint me into a corner with this post of yours. Enjoy the trip back to underneath whatever rock you call home. Gutter-sniping is my pet peive you know. Come back anytime with a real argument and we can talk.
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Total Recall
Thanks thejdog. Fade the MSM. I like that. If only the books had odds. News event A,B,and C. True or false? 2-1 odds. Fade them all and win 2 out of 3 almost every time!
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
If 2-out-of-three of everything is a conspiracy or lies mixed with truth, how do you know when the 1-out-of 3 is? And if MSM is unreliable and can't be trusted, what sources can? The Daily Kos, maybe? What is the end goal of all these evil MSM conspiracies and misleading news and history?</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Do you really expect to makes points on me using your tired Ad Hominem arguments, which are nothing more than a failed attempt to give your fallacies life and meaning when there is no life and meaning there?
Look, MR ANTI-LIBERAL I could use your name against you by the same token, but these tactics are useless. I read EVERYTHING. I read every right wing site I can, and I read between the lines. Then I take a left turn, read between the lines , and I get the opposing views. Are you following this? Then I actually THINK about both viewpoints! Then I decide what I think the truth is. Im like my own personal 12 man jury. I would never base my opinion on listening to Rush Limbaugh any more than reading the KOS. I would never base my opinion on listening to Alex Jones any more than after reading Ann Coulter. Even though her diatribe is sickenening. I force myself to read it, like a kid being forced to eat spinach, I dutifully consume it. I listen to the States argument. Then I listen to the peoples argument. Both are presumed innocent until I decide whose guilty of the big lie. You, however, seem to have a blind side in always taking side the Prosecution. Why is that. Are you ignorant, necause ignorance is also ignorance of both sides of the case. Dont you know that? You are unprepared and unqualified to even open your mouth in here unless youve reviewed all the evidence, but the word of one man is enough for you. What a genius and wise man it is who sets himself a course such as yours. Have you ever attempted to digest any left wing sites? Or is that like being forced to eat spinach. You need to open your mind and stop letting yourself be compartmentalized. I must have 20-30 sites I access- half right and left so you are a fool to think you can paint me into a corner with this post of yours. Enjoy the trip back to underneath whatever rock you call home. Gutter-sniping is my pet peive you know. Come back anytime with a real argument and we can talk.
Horrible example, first of all. Yes, words have meaning. But, labels give absolute defenitions. To say I played for the Mets would mean I have a job that employees me to be a Mets baseball player. To call me a dhimmi would imply that I am everything that, this label says. I could care less about muslums. I fight for the same rights of South American victims of the US as well. Third world countries that are far from mulslum are a focus of mine as well. The bullshit embargo on Cuba has nothing to do with any religion, yet I still oddly find myself to be against it. Strange. Use whatever words/labels you wish. But I'm not playing that game.
And how are you "focusing" exactly? What are you actually doing to "fight" for these unnamed, anonymous South American victims? Do you give money to AI, or suscribe to some horsehit magazines, maybe? You are a bladder full of hot air, impotent...a thumbprint on a skyscraper. You have one vote, same as anyone else. That's about it.
What does one have to do with the other? You are just pissed off that I actually do somthing and threw out a small example. You expected me to be like you and avoid avoid and avoid. It is not that I won't buy health care, it is that I should not HAVE to buy health care. Why is this so hard to understand?
