"Top earners back Clinton in poll after decades with GOP"
In 2012, this group backed Romney over Obama by over 10%
Hmmm, that seems to directly contradict your talking point....
Also, exit polls show in 2012 voters preferred Romney 52/54 - 46/44% in income brackets between $50-100K, and $100K+, respectively.
However, in 2008 both of those were evenly split 49 - 49%.
You do you, though. Keep on with your racist tangent. Kinda entertaining.....
People in the first graph simply shouldn't vote. If they don't have the proper judgment to stay above water financially, how are they supposed to know what's best for the nation?
Straighten out your own life first before so ignorantly believing you have the "right answers" for everyone else.
Hey, ya never know - maybe you too can get lucky and strike it rich playing poker!
:homer:
Straighten out your own life first before so ignorantly believing you have the "right answers" for everyone else.
Hey, ya never know - maybe you too can get lucky and strike it rich playing poker!
:homer:
for your next homework assignment, look at voting demographics from 2014, 2010, 2006, 2004,2002, 2000, 1998, 1996..........every two years has far back as it goes
then look at how the impoverished have voted their entire lifetime
look at who governs the poorest communities in the country and have had control for 50+ years
look at who governs the wealthiest communities
you don't even get to first base
for your next homework assignment, look at voting demographics from 2014, 2010, 2006, 2004,2002, 2000, 1998, 1996..........every two years has far back as it goes
then look at how the impoverished have voted their entire lifetime
look at who governs the poorest communities in the country and have had control for 50+ years
look at who governs the wealthiest communities
you don't even get to first base
Hey boner - you posted pictures that appear to draw a correlation to current events. You also posted statistics about CT in 2012. So, pardon me if my response used the last and current election as primary data points. Your takeaway should be what a poor candidate the Republican nominee is that both educated and high-income voters are fleeing him at an alarming rate. These trends wouldn't happen with a real-life conservative candidate like Kasich or Rubio, who would easily win this race. Supporting Trump, who has conservative principles only as an attempt to feed red-meat to the fringe of the base, is laughable and quite pathetic.
Plenty of people in that group aren't drowning. They're finding ways to spend less than they earn. Just because you're irresponsible with your money doesn't mean everyone else is. Of course you were the one who said $60k per year compensation was beyond your dreams.
One good solution would be that if someone is in debt, whoever they owe the most money to gets their vote. The banks would guarantee us eight years of Hillary
