As usual, you're FOS. The "Left" does no such thing, and much of the disgust at the drone program comes from "the left". The ACLU, Jon Stewart, Human Rights Organizations have all come out strongly against it. Although I'm not, you consider me "left", and I've come out strongly against it. Your statement, like so many you just throw out in your uncontrollable anti Obama railings, is patently and provable false.
You, Joe and Acebb have been mixing it up lately over economics, goreball warming and who is more educated and who is dumb. This is done even in threads outside those topics. So the issues you lean right on aren't being brought up here. So it's not absolutely crazy afterall
I'm still down for a truce with you. I have no problems with you. Just annoys me when I'm arguing with losers like Sheriff Joe and you come in and pick me out of the argument to criticize.
It's crazy. The funny thing is we have their old posts when Bush was Prez and they are complete hypocrites. I promise you, no matter who is President, I'm pro government and have the exact same beliefs. You seem like the same and we can even understand we have differences yet are fighting the same fight.
I don't see it that way. I may criticize the content of your post but you should not take that as a personal slight. (The exception there of course would be at times we are just trashing each other in every thread) Where you go wrong IMO is when someone like me, who may not be part of the argument you're in, enters the discussion and disagrees with your view. You tend to come back with an over the top retort which resembles something like, "I always knew you were a fraud*, you are just like poster A & B. You guys deserve each other. God are you dumb lol." And as much as I try to tell you it isn't that way you're convinced it's the case. We all make the mistake of labeling people and pigeonholing their views. Even when we're correct there's no point in constantly reminding someone. Whether you admit it or not you can be a bit (ahem) irksome. Ask your friend Vit if he ever learned anything from Scott L. He'll tell ya. Regardless, you offered a hand, I'll take it
k:*The word fraud is no longer permitted in this forum. The Guesser has ordered it changed to charleton!
You and I and some others on here are consistent in our views, and don't tailor them to who is in office. But many on here are blatant hypocrites and support the party, and/or the person, rather than the policy. This idiot Ace is falsely claiming the left is pro drones, pro NSA, and when I show how false that is, all he can come back with is not EVERYONE on the left is blasting Obama like they were blasting Bush over this. Pathetically weak sauce.
I don't see it that way. I may criticize the content of your post but you should not take that as a personal slight. (The exception there of course would be at times we are just trashing each other in every thread) Where you go wrong IMO is when someone like me, who may not be part of the argument you're in, enters the discussion and disagrees with your view. You tend to come back with an over the top retort which resembles something like, "I always knew you were a fraud*, you are just like poster A & B. You guys deserve each other. God are you dumb lol." And as much as I try to tell you it isn't that way you're convinced it's the case. We all make the mistake of labeling people and pigeonholing their views. Even when we're correct there's no point in constantly reminding someone. Whether you admit it or not you can be a bit (ahem) irksome. Ask your friend Vit if he ever learned anything from Scott L. He'll tell ya. Regardless, you offered a hand, I'll take it
*The word fraud is no longer permitted in this forum. The Guesser has ordered it changed to charleton!
Hey, I'll admit when I'm on 4-5 page back and forth rants with some of these guys (you know who), if someone comes in and says something I react inappropriately at times. I think if someone were to take sides they would obviously choose my side and if they don't I attack them. Not my strongest suit. But at the end of the day I can apologize to those that do not deserve it. So I'm sorry for my unwarranted attacks on you. Let's just get back to normal! I even feel stupid including your name in with Joe and Acebb. But you know my game, lol.
OMFG, this is from FOUR YEARS Ago. It was a rant against he FCC holding up the Sirius XM Merger, and Howard was pissed. But like most smart guys, Howard came to his senses, after making a comment in frustration and anger. You do realize Howard supported for on air and voted for Obama in 2012, and calls the Tea Party the insane nuts they are. They were probably playing a Best of Today, some wingnut heard it, and now it's all over the net like it's something new. Just proves how much of a sheep mentality these wingnuts have. http://www.examiner.com/article/howard-stern-explains-why-president-obama-won-re-election
More Wisdom From Howard about he Election and The Tea Party. Thanks for bringing this up, Casper.
“I still believe politics has got to be a bunch of people who actually believe that they can help somebody—help a constituency, help the people. And what’s gone on in the Republican party with this Tea Party—because they bow to them, these Tea Party candidates do very well in primaries because these religious kooks all go out and vote during the primaries, and so you’re stuck with guys who, by the way, run for Senate and say: ‘When you get raped, don’t worry about it because the rapist’s sperm doesn’t really make it to the egg’…He got defeated. Both of the rape dummies got defeated. Because, when women go home at night—forget what they might say at church or what they might say on TV, women shit their pants over crazy men who want to determine what goes on with their body. If you think the President appointing someone to the Supreme Court is not important to women, you’re insane.”
"Stern identifies as an Independent voter, and has a long bipartisan voting history to prove it, but this time around the King of All Media says the entire Republican party is to blame for their own demise.
“I still believe politics has got to be a bunch of people who actually believe that they can help somebody—help a constituency, help the people. And what’s gone on in the Republican party with this Tea Party—because they bow to them, these Tea Party candidates do very well in primaries because these religious kooks all go out and vote during the primaries, and so you’re stuck with guys who, by the way, run for Senate and say: ‘When you get raped, don’t worry about it because the rapist’s sperm doesn’t really make it to the egg’…He got defeated. Both of the rape dummies got defeated. Because, when women go home at night—forget what they might say at church or what they might say on TV, women shit their pants over crazy men who want to determine what goes on with their body. If you think the President appointing someone to the Supreme Court is not important to women, you’re insane.”
"Stern identifies as an Independent voter, and has a long bipartisan voting history to prove it, but this time around the King of All Media says the entire Republican party is to blame for their own demise.
“I think the thing that did in Romney very, very much was the Republican convention. It was a lackluster sea of boring people with boring ideas who just sat there and bashed the President. They just came off like a bunch of angry dudes. I’m telling you, they gotta get away from the religious right. They gotta stop being the party of the religious right. I don’t believe for one minute that Romney changed his mind on abortion, but I do believe that if he became president he would appoint Supreme Court justices who would turn back the clock. I do—because he’s got to bow to those maniacs. And he came off like a guy with no backbone.”
