Didnt read it, still know what it says. "I'm right, you're wrong."Is this real? Why are you so obsessed with me? And why are you so delusional?
One, the "two separate lines but one bet" is how it's ALWAYS been done in the rare instances that it has occurred. This is how it's been scored in EVERY YEAR in EVERY SPORT I've posted on here, and no one has ever said anything. Why do you bring this up now and not in any other week this season where I had this rare type of bet? Or in any week last season? Or during baseball?
And how come in the FOUR other times where I did this - and won each time - I only counted it as ONE win on my record instead of two? How many times do I have to say it? Each time this has happened, I won the bet. And did I count it as two separate wins? No, because that's dumb. It counted as ONE win on my record, despite having two lines. Just as if I lose tonight's game, it will count as ONE loss on my record.
You do realize that if you want everything scored in that manner, it would only improve my overall record, right? Because, as mentioned, there have been four other instances (Ex. Week 3's DEN/OAK matchup, in which I had Over 47 and Over 48, and only counted it as ONE win on my record) where such a bet took place. I won each time with BOTH lines, and, as mentioned a hundred times, it only counted as ONE win each time. So if we go through each instance where this has happened, you're saying I should get another win on my record, since I only originally counted it as one? Are you serious, man?
It's amazing. I can't win with some people here no matter what. I've abided by everything I've been told, and some just still can't let it go, referring to warnings from months ago that I have completely followed (And NFLTrends was exaggerating that number as a joke, smart one). It's unbelievable. Look in this week's thread as a perfect example: Barely even posted anything. Simply just put up my write-ups and picks, and instead I get bickering and garbage from a select few about the same things over and over and over and over. Every week. It's like clockwork. The same "tout" accusations; the same ranting against my methods of buying points on select games. It's the same thing everyyyy weekkkk from the same few of you.
And do you know what a "mis-leading" record is? How is my record AT ALL mis-leading? Did you miss the threads where we went over this and confirmed my record has been accurate all along? You do realize my win-loss record has never been fudged or anything? So how is that "mis-leading?" Every win that took place in my threads was scored as such. Every loss that took place in my threads was scored as such. And every push that took place in my threads was scored as such. What's the problem?
Lastly, you continue to ignore the math that proves I'm UP overall in games where I bought points, which we even had a thread to discuss this in, so again, here is the ACTUAL MATH concerning that topic (This is copied and pasted and does not include this week's or last week's results):
The Cat's 2013 NFL Over/Unders Where Bought Points Changed Result of the Bet(Entering Week 10)
Week 5 - Chargers @ Raiders OVER 44 (Bought 2 Pts) - $30 for $20
(Would-be loss turned into a PUSH)
Gain: $30 Positive Swing
Week 7 - Browns @ Packers OVER 42 (Bought 3 Pts) - $60 for $35
(Would-be loss turned into a WIN)
Gain: $95 Positive Swing
Week 9 - Falcons @ Panthers OVER 44 (Bought 2 Pts) - $60 for $40
(Would-be loss turned into a PUSH)
Gain: $60 Positive Swing
OVERALL GAIN FROM BUYING PTS IN OVER/UNDERS SO FAR THIS YEAR: +$185
Now for the tough part, that being the other side of the equation...
The Cat's 2013 NFL Over/Under Losses Where Bought Points Resulted in Wasted Money
Week 1 - Seahawks @ Panthers OVER 43 (Bought 1.5 Pts) - $35 for $25
Extra Loss: -$7 (Since bet
Week 2 - Lions @ Cardinals OVER 47 (Bought 0.5 Pt) - $120 for $100
Extra Loss: -$10 (Since bet
Week 3 - Cardinals @ Saints OVER 47 (Bought 1.5 Pts) - $105 for $75
Extra Loss: -$22 (Since bet
Week 4 - Steelers @ Vikings UNDER 44 (Bought 2 Pts) - $45 for $30
Extra Loss: -$12 (Since bet
Week 5 - Bills @ Browns UNDER 44 (Bought 2.5 Pts) - $80 for $50
Extra Loss: -$25 (Since bet
Week 5 - Jets @ Falcons UNDER 45 (Bought 1 Pt) - $78 for $60
Extra Loss: -$12 (Since bet
Week 5 - Chiefs @ Titans UNDER 41 (Bought 2.5 Pts) - $32 for $20
Extra Loss: -$10 (Since bet would have been $22 for $20)
Week 5 - Patriots @ Bengals OVER 44 (Bought 1.5 Pts) - $35 for $25
Extra Loss: -$7 (Since bet would have been $28 for $25)
Week 7 - Seahawks @ Cardinals UNDER 44 (Bought 2.5 Pts) - $40 for $25
Extra Loss: -$12 (Since bet would have been $28 for $25)
Week 7 - Buccaneers @ Falcons UNDER 45 (Bought 1.5 Pts) - $28 for $20
Extra Loss: -$6 (Since bet would have been $22 for $20)
Week 8 - Jets @ Bengals UNDER 44 (Bought 2.5 Pts) - $32 for $20
Extra Loss: -$10 (Since bet would have been $22 for $20)
OVERALL LOSS FROM BUYING PTS IN OVER/UNDERS SO FAR THIS YEAR: -$133
OVERALL CONCLUSION: The Cat gained $185 from over/unders that WOULD have been losses if he didn't buy the point or point(s). The Cat lost $133 from over/unders where he bought points that didn't even matter. That means in the end, up to this point of the 2013 NFL season, The Cat has profited $52 from this distinct strategy of buying points in certain over/unders.
REMEMBER, those results are entering Week 10 so the number is probably a little less than that, although that also doesn't include the Falcons/Seahawks Over from a couple of weeks ago where I bought points, which saved me a nice swing in preventing me from a loss.
Happy now? Is there anything else you want me to address for the hundredth time? I wish I could understand the hate. I really do. I'm one of the nicest guys on here and one of the most helpful. I write more analysis than anyone else on here. What else do you want me from? A hug and a handshake?
Just a long winded tout selling himself (poorly I might add) to try and pick up customers. Should be banished to site promotions IMO.
If he was auditioning for a tout job don't you think he would post tout-like plays ?
If you go to the site where he sells baseball you wont find 1 single football tout selling 4 team teasers or buying 3 points on totals , this is clearly his own personal work.
Yes he talks like a tout and he uses tout math , but these plays are clearly NOT an audition for a tout job.
...If it was an audition for a tout job he failed miserably has he has more bashers than followers.
TIME TO MOVE ON ! THERE'S NOTHING MORE TO SEE HERE.
Thats why i said he talks like a tout , but these plays are clearly NOT a tout audition.
If he presented this documentation as a resume they would laugh at him.
You find touts occasionally selling 2 team teasers on weeknight games , and often times a tout reccomends buying the hook , but nobody sells plays like he's posting. ... that site wouldnt even allow it.
hno:Well i think we could agree if we changed the language , but there is a big difference between recruiting and auditioning.
Is he using his thread to "possibly" recruit future "potential" customers ? YES !!! He's already a part time tout and wants to be a full time tout.
Is he using his thread to audition for a tout job ? NO ! No firm is going to hire him based on 13 pt teasers , buying points on totals , and playing props with stale lines from a private book.
There may be recruiting , but this is no audition.
Is he using his thread to "possibly" recruit future "potential" customers ? YES !!! He's already a part time tout and wants to be a full time tout.
Is he using his thread to audition for a tout job ? NO ! No firm is going to hire him based on 13 pt teasers , buying points on totals , and playing props with stale lines from a private book.
There may be recruiting , but this is no audition.
