Well, that's great but has nothing to do with the point. This rat scumbag is getting killed and he goes and bumps a thread where willie lost.
Keep in mind people interact with Willie and thank him for his picks. The rat is a clueless fucking idiot.
Perhaps the rat scumbag mushed you when he was rushing around this forum assuring everyone you will "keep winning"?
I wouldn't want that guy in my corner.
As far as blaming Obama it is simply that he has never come up with a strategy to contend with ISIS? That is the primary factor. Obama is not the only one to blame but he is supposed to lead and he does not know how. Any attacks inside of the U.S. definitely fall on Obama and specifically on his immigration policies (or lack thereof). What is going on now falls on Obama and his administration and they way he mishandles our military. Food stamps take precedence over VA hospitals etc. Anyone can point fingers but Obama is in a position to do things and he is not doing his job.
^^^^^^
Obama’s ISIS Ignorance Is Stunning — And Disturbing
JAMIE WEINSTEIN
Senior Editor
7981
433
President Barack Obama waves after a press conference following the G20 summit in Antalya on November 16, 2015. US President Barack Obama said November 16 the United States had no precise intelligence warning of the Paris bombing and shooting attacks that have been claimed by Islamic State group jihadists. (OZAN KOSE/AFP/Getty Images)
Has President Barack Obama gotten a single briefing on the nature of Islamism in the nearly seven years he’s occupied the Oval Office?
Considering what he said at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the Philippines Wednesday morning, it doesn’t sound like it.
“When individuals say we should have a religious test and that only Christians, proven Christians should be admitted, that’s offensive,” he declared. “I cannot think of a more potent recruitment tool for ISIL than some of the rhetoric that’s been coming out of here during the course of this debate.”
The president’s comment is stunning for a couple of reasons. For starters, it’s not true. It’s hard to imagine that a single person will join ISIS mainly because of the debate in the U.S. over whether we should accept Syrian refugees, or what type of refugees we should accept.
FROM AROUND THE WEB
But it also suggests we should change our actions just because ISIS may be able to use them to recruit more members. Should we stop educating girls because it offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment? Should we abandon Israel because it offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment? Should we shut down Hollywood because the movies it produces offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment?
Should we not stand up for the Christians ISIS is slaughtering or the Yazidi girls ISIS it is enslaving because those stands probably offend the terror group and may help it with recruitment?
Should we stop drone strikes against terrorists because it offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment?
Are we now going to run our lives and control our debates over what may or may not theoretically help ISIS with recruitment?
In reality, one of the most potent recruitment tools for ISIS is the perception that it is winning. The more successful terror attacks it is able to stage, the longer it is able to control vast swaths of territory, the more radical Muslims will want to join what is perceived to be a winning team to create the first Caliphate in nearly 100 years.
You know who has a little say in hampering this recruiting tool? Could it be the man in charge of the most powerful military in human history?
Developing a coherent strategy to deliver a crippling blow to ISIS would do far more to hurt ISIS’s recruitment program than abandoning our debate over what to do about Syrian refugees.
But President Obama appears too busy demagoguing Republicans to bother himself with that.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/17/obamas-isis-ignorance-is-stunning-and-disturbing/#ixzz3s2oyEZ4c
from the above: In reality, one of the most potent recruitment tools for ISIS is the perception that it is winning.
Obama’s ISIS Ignorance Is Stunning — And Disturbing
Senior Editor
11:20 PM 11/17/2015
7981
433
∧
Considering what he said at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in the Philippines Wednesday morning, it doesn’t sound like it.
“When individuals say we should have a religious test and that only Christians, proven Christians should be admitted, that’s offensive,” he declared. “I cannot think of a more potent recruitment tool for ISIL than some of the rhetoric that’s been coming out of here during the course of this debate.”
The president’s comment is stunning for a couple of reasons. For starters, it’s not true. It’s hard to imagine that a single person will join ISIS mainly because of the debate in the U.S. over whether we should accept Syrian refugees, or what type of refugees we should accept.
FROM AROUND THE WEB
The Cameraman Captured More Than ExpectedDaily Sanctuary
Things I Learned from Helping VeteransRaytheon
11 Faces You Know From Commercials: Who Are They?Answers.com
But it also suggests we should change our actions just because ISIS may be able to use them to recruit more members. Should we stop educating girls because it offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment? Should we abandon Israel because it offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment? Should we shut down Hollywood because the movies it produces offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment?
Should we not stand up for the Christians ISIS is slaughtering or the Yazidi girls ISIS it is enslaving because those stands probably offend the terror group and may help it with recruitment?
Should we stop drone strikes against terrorists because it offends ISIS and may help it with recruitment?
Are we now going to run our lives and control our debates over what may or may not theoretically help ISIS with recruitment?
You know who has a little say in hampering this recruiting tool? Could it be the man in charge of the most powerful military in human history?
Developing a coherent strategy to deliver a crippling blow to ISIS would do far more to hurt ISIS’s recruitment program than abandoning our debate over what to do about Syrian refugees.
But President Obama appears too busy demagoguing Republicans to bother himself with that.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/17/obamas-isis-ignorance-is-stunning-and-disturbing/#ixzz3s2oyEZ4c
from the above: In reality, one of the most potent recruitment tools for ISIS is the perception that it is winning.
There really is no such thing as "mushing" somebody. Only losers actually use that as something serious. I use that term in joking. Whoever is rooting for me to win or lose has no impact on wins and losses.
Keep in mind that Willie shoots his mouth off quite often and is wrong pretty much all the time. Guesser losing in the NFL means very little when compared to a year long contest Willie had with akp where he actually quit in defeat before it ended.
And Guesser also was "in my corner" last year while I was being bashed and I ended up winning in all sports. So it hardly matters.
Probably should do that. I can't get anything right in the NFL. Liked the under last night and had ZERO dollars on it. Even when I have a winner......I'm not winning. However, had nothing to do with Guesser.
You could be right.....the Eagles sum up the NFL .....no clue what they are week to week. They are either decent, bad or real bad. Never good though.
Yes, Bush should be in the discussion for leaving around 700 fighters for Obama to mop up, and warning the next president he better not let that number grow. So Obama, the gigantic fucking worthless pussy that he is, immediately turns tail and runs away like a cowardly homosexual in his skirt and high heels, the gigantic fucking chicken shit, declares Iraq sovereign, declares ISIS a JV team, said they would just get bored and disband, proving he is a clueless brain dead fucking idiot. He hid on the golf course or under his desk while the 700 grew to over 31,000 fighters in more than a dozen terrorist groups exploding all over the world. So what does the gigantic fucking worthless pussy do? Reigned thousands of bombs and drone strikes down on innocent people, killing them on a scale that DWARFS the number of innocents killed under Bush, causing even more people to join ISIS. Obama slaughters innocents so wantonly that even his drone teams are fed up with the orders to kill people they know are innocent. And on top of it all, Bush wouldn't have had to do a God damned thing if Carter wasn't the 3rd biggest pussy president we've ever had and Clinton wasn't the 2nd biggest pussy president we've ever had.
The worst part is that you actually believe that shit. As you babble on blaming every dem president in last 5 decades, you leave out that Obama was against the Iraq war which is what has caused all this chaos and the birth of a stronger ISIS.
So Obama is a pussy but he's killed more terrorists in his first few years than bush did in his 8 years? Yeah, that makes sense.
700? That is laughable and not even close to accurate. The good thing for you is....most everybody else at this sub forum is a mindless dolt as well .....so they will buy what you're saying. Gasman, while prone on his back drooling, will even proclaim a knockout for you.
Obama on golf course? Do you even realize Bush had way more vacation time than Obama ? Of course you don't.
The 700 is extremely accurate, you clueless idiot. Who played more rounds of golf while soldiers serving under him were having their limbs blown off? Obama, who has also killed FAR MORE INNOCENTS, how does that sit with you, liberal? Must make you SOOO happy to see all of those innocent lives scattered in pieces on the ground on the orders of your boy, Obama. He really outdid Bush there, didn't he?
Bush wasnt killing anyone......especially not terrorists. He was busy at his ranch. Him and Reagan spent their time in office playing Cowboys and Indians far away from the White House.
Bush did a great job of playing golf while people died. Check it out. Thousands led to slaughter by bush and Cheney and he did nothing. Obama had to come in and get Bin Laden....bush said he didn't care or spend time thinking about it. Sounds right...he was busy leading us into an economic collapse.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCm9788Tb5g
That's because there were far more terrorists around after Obama took office. 31,000 that the gigantic fucking pussy Obama watched grow right under his dumb liberal mantra of let's be friends with them, sympathize with the JV team and let's give them time to get bored, what a fucking dunce, even his own security cabinet thinks he's a dunce. Then he goes out and plays far more rounds of golf than Bush ever did, I wonder how many innocent lives Obama gave the order to snuff out right before hitting another golf shot into the water? Probably thousands. Again Bush and Reagan, cowboys, fine. Carter, Clinton, Obama, hands down the 3 biggest pussies to ever serve as president, and there's nothing you can do about that except accept it. So go ahead and take the last word, because your last word ALWAYS gives me the last laugh, joker.
Youve been blaming dems here since 2005. Just reading a previous post I see you blame Carter for Iran Contra. Lmao. Did Carter actually sell the weapons to Iran himself while out of office? See you're " one of those guys" that does everything to place blame on dems while protecting republicans who always cause the problem. Lemme guess....Clintons fault for 9/11 and Barney Frank's fault for economic collapse?
youre obsessed with an hour round of golf but don't seem to care at all about week long vacations of republican presidents while people are getting slaughtered.
You couldn't be more wrong.
ISIS was "completely decimated" under President Bush.
Under Obama? grown as much as 4,400%
[ISIS] was, you know, pretty much decimated when US forces were there in Iraq. It had maybe 700-or-so adherents left. And then it grew quite a bit in the last several years, when it split then from al-Qaida in Syria, and set up its own organization.
Look at how many people are there now:
The terror group that calls itself the Islamic State "can muster between 20,000 and 31,500 fighters across Iraq and Syria," a CIA spokesman told CNN on Thursday.
All you do is repeat this dumb talking point.
Hilarious.
Perhaps you can explain why ISIS wasn't barnstorming through Syria, Iraq and gunning down people in France when Bush was President? Maybe ISIS just coincidentally decided to wait until the 6th year of the Obama Presidency to become such a problem?
You don't do anything but repeat what are frankly stupid talking points on this topic.
^ Note the huge spike after 2011. Guess what happened in December 2011?
