thestrategy wnba 10-1-1 ytd

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,942
Tokens
Anyone know what just happened? My book closed the betting on the Seattle game for about 5 minutes, then when it reopened the line went from Chicago -1 to Chicago +1.5. I take it somebody is not playing? They also bumped the O/U a .5 point as well. Speaking of the O/U, it's went from 143 to 148. Don't think I can touch that total now...
 

New member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
2,272
Tokens
Wouldn't the fact the total jumped to 148 in the Chicago game benefit the under for you now, that is if you're tailing The Strategy who took the under in the same game at 143, 5 pts lower?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,942
Tokens
Wouldn't the fact the total jumped to 148 in the Chicago game benefit the under for you now, that is if you're tailing The Strategy who took the under in the same game at 143, 5 pts lower?

Yes and no. I suppose if you love the under, you would be happy to get it at 5 points better. Having said that, the fact that the total has moved 5 points in the OPPOSITE direction tells me there is some serious money on the over. That worries me. A move of 5 points is probably more than just "public money" IMO.

Not only that, but I doubt there is very much public money being bet on WNBA games anyway. I mean let's be honest, how many people even pay attention to this sport?? And when the public does bet on the WNBA, I doubt they're betting much money on the games, unlike the NFL or NBA. So I just don't think the public would be influencing lines in WNBA games.
 

New member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
2,272
Tokens
So what you're saying Peter is that even though you liked the under to begin with, the fact that the number has moved 5 points tells you that some sharps may have placed some money on the over and that now has you concerned to the point where you're not so certain about the under anymore.
Also being that you maintain the public probably hasn't moved the total this much because the public really doesn't play the WNBA as much as the NBA, etc., therefore it's most likely some with serious money on the over that have moved the number 5points in the opposite direction.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,942
Tokens
So what you're saying Peter is that even though you liked the under to begin with, the fact that the number has moved 5 points tells you that some sharps may have placed some money on the over and that now has you concerned to the point where you're not so certain about the under anymore.
Also being that you maintain the public probably hasn't moved the total this much because the public really doesn't play the WNBA as much as the NBA, etc., therefore it's most likely some with serious money on the over that have moved the number 5points in the opposite direction.

That's precisely what I'm saying Ivan. My guess would be that very few casual fans bet the WNBA, unlike higher profile sports like football, basketball, etc. Typically, the less interest there is in a sport, the less time Vegas will put into those lines. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they just pick a random number. But they know that there will be far less action on these games, so they stand to lose less money. This is where "sharps" see an advantage, because they think they can beat the "softer" lines.

The same thing happens with, say, college football. The high profile games (Texas vs. Oklahoma, OSU vs. Michigan, etc.) will have tight lines because Vegas knows everyone and their mother will bet on those games. Because of this, a lot of sharps will try to focus on the lesser known divisions. Because the lines in those divisions get less attention, thus they think are "beatable." For instance, I have a buddy who does very well every year at college football, and the ONLY division he bets is the MAC.

One last thing I should clarify though, I don't cap or watch WNBA at all. I was just intrigued by this post since it's obvious Strategy is doing very well with his wagers. I was considering following the under bet, but when I saw a full 5 point movement the other way, it scared me off of it. It may very well still hit, I just don't like see that much money going the other way.

GL
 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,373
Tokens
SUNDAY:

Taking Chicago +1.5 and under 143.

Maybe I was wrong with my perception when it comes to Chicago. This team first lead by dd at Minnesota before collapsing and then led by dd most of the game at home against Atlanta. They were over 50% from the field in both games. Seattle is a contender this season but as I already said, they have many new faces and they'll need more time to build a new identity and be consistent on the road. They are a notoriously inconsistent road team and with this being their third straight road game and 4th road game in first five games, I expect them to go back to their usual themselves on the road. This game is also a last game vs East before hitting a very important stretch of 7 straight games vs conference opponents. Also, despite these two teams current o/u records, I expexct a low scoring game because their tempo so far has been slow and they can't keep making every shot out there. Last season these two led the league with unders and the under won in both meetings.

Two more winners.

Thanks.

:toast:
 

New member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,942
Tokens
Very nice day Strategy, and very nice job so far this year.

Wow, the game stayed under the closing number by 27 points! The line movement scared me off of a winner on that one.

Keep up the good work!
 

New member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
26
Tokens
thestrategy wnba 10 1 1 ytd

Whats the reasoning behind having the WNBA draft so soon after the college season ends? Im assuming it is due to the time of year they have the season.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,716
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com