JOH™;11436357 said:
Just wondering what the consensus is... was this format with the MOV better than the old type "Rank The Bowls" or worse?
If the old type "Rank The Bowls" was ATS my personal vote would be that was better than this but not by a lot....barely in fact because I did like the SU offering of games....stunning I managed to lose as many as I did....odd bowl season...in my experience at least..usually do much much better SU.
I think the amount that everyone was OFF of MOV testifies to this Bowl Season being a "unique" one.
Overall though....if pressed I'd say this format was very very good, I'd be fine with it but I'd also be fine if others vote for the Old Type Rank The Bowls. I'm interested to know if the group prefers, as a whole, SU or ATS selecting.....in the end I'd have to let them decide cuz I'd be fine with either way but feels like I have a very slight preference for SU selections.
I do feel that incorporating MOV was very very good, should be retained as a tie breaker with whichever format is chosen by the group....my expectation though is that the majority would feel otherwise.
Very very interesting how the top guys also did best with MOV....thats what I meant by saying to BAS "True Championship Performance" but that applicable to the 2nd & 3rd place guys
also cuz with at least the 2nd Place guy...it came down to that freaky as heck (
and Historic) TCU Comeback / Oregon Ducks Implosion...
Teams leading by somewhere around that much or more at half was, like, 1146-0 SU until this game....or something like that...Bizarre that the first time out of 1147 times...decides this contest....
Great Contest IMO....the best College Bowl contest out there...IMO....concept wise.....because I think the SU format makes for a tighter most competitive contest possible.