From what I know of Hache on this forum , he's a responsible and upstanding individual. He's been co-treasurer since day one I believe. It was not his intention to fuck the league, he said he never meant to drop Forset.
Gore was on a bye, Luck is out for a while and hasn't done much anyhow, he had to try and win this week and people sometimes tire on players who aren't doing as well as expected and they're losing
I know I made one boneheaded decision in another league, I picked up West after losing Charles but then I cut West after one bad week vs MN
Shit happens
Gore was on a bye, Luck is out for a while and hasn't done much anyhow, he had to try and win this week and people sometimes tire on players who aren't doing as well as expected and they're losing
I know I made one boneheaded decision in another league, I picked up West after losing Charles but then I cut West after one bad week vs MN
Shit happens
Hache did not intentionally try to fuck anyone he just let his emotions get the best of him without thinking about the repercussions it could potentially have on the league.
Im sure he agrees that Gore is better then Hankerson but he probably felt like he wanted to wash his hands of Gore because he considered Gore to be a direct reason for his teams shortcomings this year.
Hankerson did not bring out that type of emotion because Hankerson was not a key player on the team.
At the end of the season when he misses the playoffs he is not going to say he lost because of Hankerson.
He is going to say Gore and Luck failed him so he wanted to rid himself of those problems.
With that being said he would have been better off not letting his emotions get the best of him for the sake of the rest of the league.
So what he did was dumb but not with evil intent
Im sure he agrees that Gore is better then Hankerson but he probably felt like he wanted to wash his hands of Gore because he considered Gore to be a direct reason for his teams shortcomings this year.
Hankerson did not bring out that type of emotion because Hankerson was not a key player on the team.
At the end of the season when he misses the playoffs he is not going to say he lost because of Hankerson.
He is going to say Gore and Luck failed him so he wanted to rid himself of those problems.
With that being said he would have been better off not letting his emotions get the best of him for the sake of the rest of the league.
So what he did was dumb but not with evil intent
I countered, a trade that Yahoo projects for you to pick up 13.44 points as you get the RB you need and I only drop 1.73 points (not the 30 to 50 points I'm usually projected to lose with trade offers from everyone
)
Now Yahoo projections are only a tool, but it's something to look at. I think the trade improves my team too.
Having a 2nd solid RB really improves your team.
)Now Yahoo projections are only a tool, but it's something to look at. I think the trade improves my team too.
Having a 2nd solid RB really improves your team.
I countered, a trade that Yahoo projects for you to pick up 13.44 points as you get the RB you need and I only drop 1.73 points (not the 30 to 50 points I'm usually projected to lose with trade offers from everyone
Now Yahoo projections are only a tool, but it's something to look at. I think the trade improves my team too.
Having a 2nd solid RB really improves your team.
I countered again. I would need to undoubtedly WIN on our deal if we make one. But that does not mean you lose as far as your final playoff roster.
it's the same trade, I don't care about Cam or Carson if I'm getting Brady, so switching one out makes no difference at all (I need one as an emergency, they're both very good)
What I'm never going to do is trade two of my RB's, it's not happening
My offer to you this morning is my very best offer, I'm ready to roll with what I have
You can have one RB not named Gurley, and either QB
What I'm never going to do is trade two of my RB's, it's not happening
My offer to you this morning is my very best offer, I'm ready to roll with what I have
You can have one RB not named Gurley, and either QB
well, fwiw, Yahoo rated you to be better from my offer and me slightly worse
with your offer, you get a lot better and I get a lot worse, that doesn't make sense in my world
I was willing to part with 1 RB, since I know I can only play 3, you kept axing for two
lastly, this is what it appears you're overlooking.
While you're giving me the # 1 QB, I'm giving back the # 2 QB (or # 4 QB). The difference between Brady and Cam is 24 points, < 3 per game. The projections are 7 points apart for the rest of the season, consistent with YTD results. The QB trade was virtually a wash
I offer one RB ranked 5 or 14 or 18 YTD, remaining projections 14, 8 & 18, respectively. All three an automatic start in your shorthanded backfield
M Bryant improves my team at WR, but he's even on a bye this week so I'm short handed still for one week
At the end of the day,
1) I offered you a big improvement at RB (you wanted a complete overall and massive improvement)
2) I get a good upgrade at WR
3) I get a very small upgrade at QB
my offer was reasonable, and improved both teams.
your offers are one sided, IMHO
