There’s no talk of the poker hand at Hustler Casino Live high stakes?

bigbet1234 · Oct 5, 2022

crudebar said:
What is ironic is that she shit talked him after the hand, but then in the end gave the money back? Strange.

Now she is challenging him to HU. Jeesh. He is one of the best poker players in the world. Good luck with that one, hope you have a sugar daddy paying the bill.

I know right. She wasn’t cheating. She’s just completely clueless. Garret has to remember she is not a pro.

she felt bad because she was slammed for calling it, she’s on a live stream and made a split second decision to settle the “beef” he had with her, and give his money back. Wasn’t her money . Then when loud mouthed boyfriend “RIP” starts running his mouth.

You got beat Garret by someone calling your bluff with a J4 off. It happens. Remember that next time you shove against a novice. Lol

festeringZit · Oct 5, 2022

theMadMan said:
I ASK THIS---------------- IF SHE/(they) WERE CHEATING -HOW WAS IT ACCOMPLISHED?
1. did they know the holdings ---Players cheated....
2.was the deck set up ?---Casino/Dealer possibly cheated ...too

I'm assuming most here understand poker and how Texas hold-em works ?----Now go back and re watch the video .........

The money gets in on the TURN!!!!! so the river can change /Decide to outcome In Fact it was exactly 53 % /46 % Basically a coin flip!

SO WHY CHEAT ON A COIN FLIP ???? -and ,,,,THEY WERE THE 46 % by the way!!!!!!!

Also they Ran it Twice .... further favoring the randomness of the run out ..........Basically Still gambling!

I agree everything looks a little fishy here ......... BUT Bottom line they Got their money in- on a coin flip and WON!

Move on ........NO NEWS HERE Just another Poker Hand

Conceivably, the information being relayed to her isn't telling her her chances of winning the hand, i.e. 53%/46%. It could just be telling her
if her hand is good at that point or not.

Honestly, I can't make up my mind what I think went on, the hand is so fucked up.

crudebar · Oct 5, 2022

She was ahead in the session and on stream overall. She "only" had around 30k invested in the hand yet calls off another 109k with 2 napkins. She might be a novice compared to professional players but she is nowhere near brand new to poker or playing some sort of celebrity poker.(oooo the mid 2000s when producers thought there was a demand for that)

What's also funny is she was just about ready to snap call with j,4...then decides to throw in a time chip quick and then quickly calls about 5 seconds after that....

crudebar · Oct 6, 2022

My favorite part of all this....

Far left calling it a classic case of misogyny. Basically guy wouldn't have thought twice about this hand if lost to a man(lol) the only problem he had was losing to a girl. Even though he was initially laughing and telling her she got him...he never had a problem until he saw her hand---for obvious reasons. To bad for Mike Postle he wasn't a woman---would of had an army of defenders saying guys can't stand losing to the poker goddess and all this is...

Most of these people will admit they know nothing about poker but declare being highly educated apparently on misogyny (lol). So their opinion matters! I love the points they make that it was okay for him to bluff with 8 high but she isn't allowed to call with Jack high? Classic misogyny. Classic knowing nothing about poker. The guy flopped a combo draw and made perfectly standard plays...not to mention the world of difference between semi-bluffing and getting called down with 2 napkins.

The people looking for misogyny should look at their own----people defending her stating...."she was confused" "she was rattled" "she can't remember her own hand from the previous hand even though she looked back at it 6 times" this is the classic misogyny. A guy makes this call and he receives the same about of scrutiny but hardly anyone would ever call him confused, rattled, etc. It's the classic "ooo she has girl brain."

Trying to twist it that he couldn't handle losing to a girl is laughable at best.