I dont know man..would that really be fair to the person in the lead?..if they had the same side as the others they would have won automatically..this just enables the 2nd and 3rd players to take a shot based on the leaders pick..I dont know..you 3 decide..and will be tuff if Pub dont chime in
I dont know man..would that really be fair to the person in the lead?..if they had the same side as the others they would have won automatically..this just enables the 2nd and 3rd players to take a shot based on the leaders pick..I dont know..you 3 decide..and will be tuff if Pub dont chime in
Who ever is in lead picks first? Why would that be and why would they have to be in the open? No one would post...they would hold out til the other did...like Saturday *ahem....(j/k pubguy) Denniz is here now making sure they get posted after kickoff...I'm not ok with posting in the open and leader going first. Also what does PO anyone mean?
Here is the problem you have
If Pubguys pick is staying Florida I going Ok so you are going to have to win one way or the other.
The only thing you can hope for is Pub shows up cause unfortunately your lead is meaningless except for the tiebreaker with Pub
What I was trying to do is give you a chance to pick Florida and then no one else could.
Dont know just trying to come up with something so we can all watch the game and enjoy.
I dont know dick now that I wrote it out that would be giving Pub a shot of winning when he shouldnt.
Fuck this. Ill take a $100 buy out and leave peacefully:cripwalk:
<TABLE class="matchupBox fontsize12" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=banner><TD colSpan=2>COLLEGE FOOTBALL - Jan 08 </TD></TR><TR class=banner><TD colSpan=2>THURSDAY, JANUARY 8TH - BCS CHAMPIONSHIP GAME DOLPHIN STADIUM - MIAMI, FL </TD></TR><TR class=evenRow><TD class=leftColumn><SMALL>5:15 PM</SMALL></TD><TD class=rightColumn><TABLE class="" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=rotCell>267</TD><TD class=teamCell>FLORIDA</TD><TD class=selectCell><LABEL class=""><INPUT class=chkbox type=checkbox value=822385_2_0_-4_-115_CFB name=game>-4-115 </LABEL></TD><TD class=selectCell><LABEL class=""><INPUT class=chkbox type=checkbox value=822385_2_2_-70_-110_CFB name=game>o70-110 </LABEL></TD><TD class=selectCell><LABEL class=""><INPUT class=chkbox type=checkbox value=822385_2_4_0_-190_CFB name=game>-190</LABEL></TD></TR><TR><TD class=rotCell>268</TD><TD class=teamCell>OKLAHOMA</TD><TD class=selectCell><LABEL class=""><INPUT class=chkbox type=checkbox value=822385_2_1_4_-105_CFB name=game>+4-105 </LABEL></TD><TD class=selectCell><LABEL class=""><INPUT class=chkbox type=checkbox value=822385_2_3_70_-110_CFB name=game>u70-110 </LABEL></TD><TD class=selectCell><LABEL class=""><INPUT class=chkbox type=checkbox value=822385_2_5_0_160_CFB name=game>+160</LABEL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Agreed here. I like the totals idea, although from my viewpoint, since I had planned to pick Florida before knowing PG pick, if Florida wins, I may now risk losing after being a guaranteed winner because of a new factor (PG play getting exposed) On the other hand, definitely not PG fault either. And I had forgotten about TTP being in the mix still too. I don't know who he would have picked.
Maybe we put the $450 on one side...hope it wins, then split the $900. Hell I don't know. But I feel like throwing in other things like a total at this stage of the game is only advantageous to TTP and PG and hurting me. But maybe that's because I am the only one who knows that I was really going to pick Florida, and I am operating on the assumption that Florida wins... that's why it seems so unfair to me.
Where is WW? He seems to have a lot of experience in these matters.
I am the true victim and want WW to straighten this shit out.
Lets look at facts.
Pubguy florida
In Action Florida
Me - Okl.
Now if they switch picks i get fucked.
In action heres what ill tell ya
If Pub dont show back up his Florida pick sticks
Then u take Florida and I take Okl
You have who u wanted. I feel bad for Pub but guy has to show up
Lets look at facts.
Pubguy florida
In Action Florida
Me - Okl.
Now if they switch picks i get fucked.
In action heres what ill tell ya
If Pub dont show back up his Florida pick sticks
Then u take Florida and I take Okl
You have who u wanted. I feel bad for Pub but guy has to show up
In action girl<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> vbmenu_register("postmenu_6279625", true); </SCRIPT>
RX Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 942 ...like I said..Fla wins and you do not..then you got the shaft..just about everyone of your 942 post proves your crediblity when you say you would have had Florida ( and your damn right they are gonna win)
RX Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 942 ...like I said..Fla wins and you do not..then you got the shaft..just about everyone of your 942 post proves your crediblity when you say you would have had Florida ( and your damn right they are gonna win)
TTP.. I see what you were saying now. We are going to think ourselves into madness. I say at this point we make it a joint venture and try to win some money to divide. I know this defeats the purpose of a competition etc..but I don't want any hard feelings at the end of this...but we could jointly pick a team to bet on ..then hedge it on our own if we want and all be guaranteed something.
Does that make sense? I guess that is basically the same as splitting the $450 which I would be fine with too except betting it would be more fun.
Does that make sense? I guess that is basically the same as splitting the $450 which I would be fine with too except betting it would be more fun.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tYZM8T5QJ5o&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tYZM8T5QJ5o&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
He is my final say for this issue tonight..it wont be resolved now anyway and it requires someone to put their ass in the air and submit
I will say:
Inactiongirl had Fla and Fla win would have won her $450..
TTP had Oklahoma and if they win he is out the $
Pubguy would have had no shot..but has a gripe in that his play was posted early
None of this can be changed now..whats done is done..
I say include the totals in the next game and PM them to me..I
will post them during the K-off..
Or....TTP has OK..Inaction has Fla..and Pubguy does not pay out his loss..just food for thought-the Menace
I will say:
Inactiongirl had Fla and Fla win would have won her $450..
TTP had Oklahoma and if they win he is out the $
Pubguy would have had no shot..but has a gripe in that his play was posted early
None of this can be changed now..whats done is done..
I say include the totals in the next game and PM them to me..I
will post them during the K-off..
Or....TTP has OK..Inaction has Fla..and Pubguy does not pay out his loss..just food for thought-the Menace
Very Accurate Assesment DDM....but no way do way I want to play totals.. If FLA wins, I could be out $50 instead of winning my rightful $450? Doesn't seem right. But none of it does. Last time.. I will split, joint bet, or I am sticking to original rules and my intended pick of Florida. If I win, I would not make PG pay.
You are right none of it gets settled tonight, but there's my stance. I won't be around all day tomorrow so I wanted to confirm that is my position. Still don't know what PO means in this context. I know who you are talking about just don't know what he did in a contest.
Man is Pubguy going to have some reading to do when he gets back here.
You are right none of it gets settled tonight, but there's my stance. I won't be around all day tomorrow so I wanted to confirm that is my position. Still don't know what PO means in this context. I know who you are talking about just don't know what he did in a contest.
Man is Pubguy going to have some reading to do when he gets back here.
