The Rankings Have Arrived.....ESPN.

[Greenbacks]

Just some stuff i got off the Twitter feed.

 

[ML Dog]

I agree.
　
An 8 team playoff would mean all the Big 5 Conference Championships would be "win and your in" playoff games.
　
Let the committee decide the 3 at-large spots, and set the pairings. That's it.

Simple.

NCAA squandering a massive opportunity to greatly enhance the Value of their brand here and to increase Interest in Key areas of the country

by not having in place a system that allows OK Sooners with Mayfield and that powerful offense into this, by leaving out USC and what they've managed to accomplish after Darnold taking over at QB. Michigan, PSU...

and the way you put it: "The Big 5 Conference Championships would be "win and your in" playoff games."


Jeez.

NCAA even should be able to see the change they need to make.

Just a shame that could not be, for this season.....many great teams that would have brought some serious fireworks to a TRUE Natty Champ

playoff.

 

[THawk+]

total joke that Ohio State gets in. they do not deserve it over Penn St.

NCAA and this faux championship is a complete farce.

 

[texansfan]

I have a problem with a 2 loss Penn State team getting in, but I also have a problem with a team not winning it's own championship getting in. Looks like we'll have a rematch of last years game.

 

[SunDodger]

They would have to figure out a way to get the Rose Bowl on board with an 8-team playoff. I don't even think they wanted to be a part of a 4-team playoff. All the Rose Bowl wants is a Pac 12 vs Big 10 match up.

And they don't want to move from their 2pm pacific time slot on New Years Day. That's why the Semis are being played on New Years Eve in the odd years.

 

[ML Dog]

They would have to figure out a way to get the Rose Bowl on board with an 8-team playoff. I don't even think they wanted to be a part of a 4-team playoff. All the Rose Bowl wants is a Pac 12 vs Big 10 match up.

And they don't want to move from their 2pm pacific time slot on New Years Day. That's why the Semis are being played on New Years Eve in the odd years.

Great Point, that did not occur to me: about The Rose Bowl.

I'd imagine NCAA can pretty much dictate, to all Bowl Committees what they are going to do

but if there were an exception to that, a Bowl they could not dictate to

that would be The Rose Bowl.


I'd need a Play-In game also, between a couple of Wild Cards


so that I could get 13-0 Western Michigan a shot

at Glory

 

[StevieRay]

GB is delusional. Opening line is -11.

17.5 now. Don't know anyone locked in Bama -11

 

[MantisToboggan]

17.5 now. Don't know anyone locked in Bama -11

Where? I've got 16.

 

[KingEleven]

17

 

[texansfan]

271
272

3:00p

(4) Washington
(1) Alabama​

+14 -110
-14 -110

+16½ -102
-16½ -110

+16½ -110
-16½ -110

+17 -115
-17 -105

+16½ -110
-16½ -110

+16½ -105
-16½ -105

+17 -115
-17 -105

+16½ -110
-16½ -110

+17 -115
-17 -105

+16½ -110
-16½ -110

+16½ -110
-16½ -110
​

I didn't show the books, but these are some current lines out there.

 

[texansfan]

It didn't format worth a damn, but you get the idea.

 

[MantisToboggan]

It didn't format worth a damn, but you get the idea.

Thanks for posting that. I wish I could get 17.5. Hope it gets there.

 

[StevieRay]

College Football Playoff - Peach Bowl - Georgia Dome - Atlanta, GA

2:00 PM - Washington U vs Alabama 271 Washington U <select name="ctl00$cphWorkArea$Cbo-656068-1-1-2" id="ctl00_cphWorkArea_Cbo-656068-1-1-2" class="line_txt_l border" style="width: 90px; height: 20px; float: left; font-size: 8pt; font-family: Calibri; margin-left: 10px; border-color: black;"> <option selected="selected" value="0">+17½ -110</option> <option value="1">+18 -120</option> <option value="2">+18½ -130</option> <option value="3">+19 -140</option> <option value="4">+19½ -150</option> </select> ​ <input name="ctl00$cphWorkArea$Amt-656068-1-1-2" type="number" id="ctl00_cphWorkArea_Amt-656068-1-1-2" class="line_txtbx_l border" step="any" title="Limit|400.00" style="width: 50px; float: left; font-size: 9pt; font-family: Calibri; margin-left: 10px; border-color: black;"> 272 Alabama <select name="ctl00$cphWorkArea$Cbo-656068-1-2-2" id="ctl00_cphWorkArea_Cbo-656068-1-2-2" class="line_txt_l border" style="width: 90px; height: 20px; float: left; font-size: 8pt; font-family: Calibri; margin-left: 10px; border-color: black;"> <option selected="selected" value="0">-17½ -110</option> <option value="1">-17 -120</option> <option value="2">-16½ -130</option> <option value="3">-16 -140</option> <option value="4">-15½ -150</option> </select> ​ <input name="ctl00$cphWorkArea$Amt-656068-1-2-2" type="number" id="ctl00_cphWorkArea_Amt-656068-1-2-2" class="line_txtbx_l border" step="any" title="Limit|400.00" style="width: 50px; float: left; font-size: 9pt; font-family: Calibri; margin-left: 10px; border-color: black;"> <tbody> </tbody> <tbody> </tbody>

<tbody>
</tbody>

 

[thekeyman]

As a Alabama fan i would never bet against them,but will bet with them and this year i seen several minus 20's and 30's and thought wow no way,now not that i went against them,but i either passed or bet the total instead.This 14.5 which is like -16 some places now don't scare me,especially dealing with this kind of offense.


Just look at some of these scores of these games,and take a look at the rushing yards that Florida had-0

Alabama gives up 63.8 rushing yards a game= insane,....go ahead bet against them :missingte

Date Opponent Line OU Score SU ATS OU RY RYPA PY PYPC RY RYPA PY PYPC 12/03 N FLORIDA -23.5 40.5 54-16 W W Ov 234 6.2 138 12.5 0 0.0 261 10.0 11/26 vs AUBURN -20.5 46.5 30-12 W L Un 203 4.6 298 10.6 66 2.5 116 16.6 11/19 vs UT-CHATTANOOGA -49 65.5 31-3 W L Un 196 5.3 136 9.1 70 2.3 114 6.7 11/12 vs MISSISSIPPI ST -30 52 51-3 W W Ov 218 7.0 397 12.8 94 2.7 180 11.2 11/05 at LSU -7 46 10-0 W W Un 216 4.2 107 10.7 33 1.2 92 8.4 10/22 vs TEXAS A&M -18 59.5 33-14 W W Un 287 5.0 164 10.9 114 3.0 164 11.7 10/15 at TENNESSEE -13.5 54 49-10 W W Ov 438 8.9 156 9.2 32 1.0 131 7.3 10/08 at ARKANSAS -14.5 48.5 49-30 W W Ov 264 7.8 253 19.5 73 2.0 400 16.0 10/01 vs KENTUCKY -37.5 56.5 34-6 W L Un 173 4.7 315 12.6 72 2.0 89 6.8 09/24 vs KENT ST -42 49 48-0 W W Un 285 6.2 217 9.9 82 2.7 84 12.0 09/17 at OLE MISS -11 53.5 48-43 W L Ov 334 7.0 158 8.3 106 3.3 421 16.2 09/10 vs W KENTUCKY -27 59 38-10 W W Un 124 3.2 351 14.0 23 1.0 216 11.4 09/03 N USC -13.5 51.5 52-6 W W Ov 242 5.4 223 18.6 64 2.1 130 7.2 <tbody> </tbody>

<tbody>
</tbody>

© All Rig

<tbody>
</tbody>