Well and good in the 50&60s when these Fuckers didn't have a way to get here. It's an interconnected world now. When you have a parasitic dictatorship that feeds by keeping its population enslaved, and by controlling its media brainwashes them into believing the Western World is responsible for their depraved conditions, the hate that foments now ends up here in the form of terrorism.
I see what you are saying, but I think the situation is a little more insidious regarding Islamic fundamentalism. it has nothing to do with people's living conditions. Heck, Osama Bin Laden himself was a pretty wealthy businessman if I remember correctly. It has nothing to do with economy and everything to do with an aggressive ideology which seeks nothing but world domination.
Another thing is that the "military industrian complex" (I know, I know...) loves the current situation. Hard to justify an ever expanding military budget after the Cold War finished. This "War on Terror" is very useful to some interests. It's not about actually solving problems, but about perpetuating problems. If they wanted to solve the problem there are some unpopular but highly effective measures that could be taken (think Hiroshima over the Islamic State). I am not a wacko, by the way. Simply a realist. The reason Hiroshima and Nagasaki happened were because they were the only reasonable measures to guarantee a swift end of the war.
I say do something like that to the Islamic State. Give civilians a 2 day warning to clear the area, and have heavy aerial presence around it to make sure the "bad guys" don't run away en masse.
But solving the problem quickly is not what the armament companies want, obviously. They want an extended conflict that will guarantee a steady source of income at the expense of a steady stream of blood.
There are also internal political measures (highly unpopular amongst some sectores perhaps) that could be taken. For example, immediately deporting every family member (immediate family) of American terrorists. That would make family members more vigilant and willing to report possible problems with people in their environment to the authorities. Sure, some innocent people would be kicked out, but when you are confronted with a problem with this magnitude there are no "perfect" and "clean" solutions.
I'm sure this is going to work out swell
Norway: Mohammed most common men's name in Oslo
"It is very exciting," Jorgen Ouren of Statistics Norway tells The Local news website. A recent count of the city's population showed more than 4,800 men and boys in the city are called Mohammed, beating out other popular names like Jan and Per. Although Mohammed - with various spellings - has been the favourite name for baby boys in Oslo for the past four years, this is the first time it has also topped the men's list.
=====
We are probably witnessing the first time in human history where a race extinguishes itself while giggling.
As has been said before, given the level of Muslim immigration/population growth in the West, gay marriage is only a temporary condition.
Norway: Mohammed most common men's name in Oslo
"It is very exciting," Jorgen Ouren of Statistics Norway tells The Local news website. A recent count of the city's population showed more than 4,800 men and boys in the city are called Mohammed, beating out other popular names like Jan and Per. Although Mohammed - with various spellings - has been the favourite name for baby boys in Oslo for the past four years, this is the first time it has also topped the men's list.
=====
We are probably witnessing the first time in human history where a race extinguishes itself while giggling.
As has been said before, given the level of Muslim immigration/population growth in the West, gay marriage is only a temporary condition.
[h=1]Muslim man who 'admitted to randomly shooting dead New Jersey teenager in act of vengeance for US presence in Middle East' pleads NOT guilty to murder[/h]
PUBLISHED: 01:47, 5 August 2015 | UPDATED: 02:36, 5 August 2015
The Muslim man accused of randomly killing a New Jersey teenager pleaded not guilty in court on Tuesday.
Ali Muhammad Brown, 30, has been charged with felony murder, carjacking, robbery, multiple weapons offenses and even New Jersey's first terror charge for the alleged murder of 19-year-old Brendan Tevlin in West Orange on June 25, 2014.
His not guilty plea comes despite the fact that court documents filed in Washington reveal that he admitted to authorities he killed Tevlin in a act of 'vengeance' for all the innocent lives lost in countries including Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Syria.
+5
+5
Horror: Ali Muhammad Brown (left) has been charged with felony murder and New Jersey's first terror charge for the murder of 19-year-old Brendan Tevlin (right)
+5
Unbelievable: Brown pleaded not guilty to all charges against him in court on Tuesday as Tevlin's parents Allison and Michael looked on (Allison and Michael above in an interview last year) despite admitting to the murder last year according to court documents
Tevlin is just one of four men that Brown has been accused of killing.
He faces three additional murder charge in Washington in the deaths of 30-year-old Leroy Henderson last April and the June 1 shooting deaths of Ahmed Said and Dwone Anderson-Young.
[h=2][/h]
Tevlin - who had just finished his freshman year at University of Richmond - was stopped at a traffic light when he was shot dead.
Brown then allegedly moved Tevlin's body into the passenger seat of the car and drove him to a nearby apartment building where he abandoned the car.
At the time he was a fugitive having been wanted for two of the three previous murders in Washington, and was eventually apprehended on July 17 living in a makeshift campsite not far from where Tevlin was killed.
NJ.com reported that in papers filed in Washington last August, Brown said of his reason for killing Tevlin; 'All these lives are taken every single day by America, by this government. So a life for a life.'
On Tuesday, Tevlin's parents Allison and Michael watched as Brown entered his plea.
+5
Saying godbye: Friends and family gather last July 1 for Brendan's funeral
+5
Awful: Allison said of her son's death; 'It's a parent's worst nightmare' (above Brendan's parents and friends at a lacrosse tournament they organized in his honor)
Allison said of her son's death; 'It's a parent's worst nightmare.'
She also applauded prosecutors for seeking a terror conviction in the case, saying it was clear that the only reason this happened to her son was because he was American.
'It is our belief that Brendan was senselessly executed for no reason other than he was an American and that this outrageous fact will be proven at trial,' she said.
Her husband seemed a bit more weary, acknowledging that the trial would be a long and difficult process for the family.
The pair did however manage to stay calm and collected despite the horrific circumstances, with Allison saying of Brown; 'He doesn't deserve a reaction.'
.
- Ali Muhammad Brown, 30, has been charged with felony murder and New Jersey's first terror charge for the murder of 19-year-old Brendan Tevlin
- Tevlin was killed on June 25, 2014 in West Orange while he was stopped at a traffic light
- Brown allegedly shot Tevlin dead then moved his body to the passenger seat of the car and abandoned it at a nearby apartment building
- He later said that the random shooting was 'vengeance' for lives that 'are taken every single day by America' overseas
- Brown pleaded not guilty to all charges against him in court on Tuesday as Tevlin's parents Allison and Michael looked on
- Brown is also accused of murdering three other men in Washington before Tevlin was killed
PUBLISHED: 01:47, 5 August 2015 | UPDATED: 02:36, 5 August 2015
The Muslim man accused of randomly killing a New Jersey teenager pleaded not guilty in court on Tuesday.
Ali Muhammad Brown, 30, has been charged with felony murder, carjacking, robbery, multiple weapons offenses and even New Jersey's first terror charge for the alleged murder of 19-year-old Brendan Tevlin in West Orange on June 25, 2014.
His not guilty plea comes despite the fact that court documents filed in Washington reveal that he admitted to authorities he killed Tevlin in a act of 'vengeance' for all the innocent lives lost in countries including Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Syria.
+5
+5
Horror: Ali Muhammad Brown (left) has been charged with felony murder and New Jersey's first terror charge for the murder of 19-year-old Brendan Tevlin (right)
+5
Unbelievable: Brown pleaded not guilty to all charges against him in court on Tuesday as Tevlin's parents Allison and Michael looked on (Allison and Michael above in an interview last year) despite admitting to the murder last year according to court documents
Tevlin is just one of four men that Brown has been accused of killing.
He faces three additional murder charge in Washington in the deaths of 30-year-old Leroy Henderson last April and the June 1 shooting deaths of Ahmed Said and Dwone Anderson-Young.
[h=2][/h]
Tevlin - who had just finished his freshman year at University of Richmond - was stopped at a traffic light when he was shot dead.
Brown then allegedly moved Tevlin's body into the passenger seat of the car and drove him to a nearby apartment building where he abandoned the car.
At the time he was a fugitive having been wanted for two of the three previous murders in Washington, and was eventually apprehended on July 17 living in a makeshift campsite not far from where Tevlin was killed.
NJ.com reported that in papers filed in Washington last August, Brown said of his reason for killing Tevlin; 'All these lives are taken every single day by America, by this government. So a life for a life.'
On Tuesday, Tevlin's parents Allison and Michael watched as Brown entered his plea.
+5
Saying godbye: Friends and family gather last July 1 for Brendan's funeral
+5
Awful: Allison said of her son's death; 'It's a parent's worst nightmare' (above Brendan's parents and friends at a lacrosse tournament they organized in his honor)
Allison said of her son's death; 'It's a parent's worst nightmare.'
She also applauded prosecutors for seeking a terror conviction in the case, saying it was clear that the only reason this happened to her son was because he was American.
'It is our belief that Brendan was senselessly executed for no reason other than he was an American and that this outrageous fact will be proven at trial,' she said.
Her husband seemed a bit more weary, acknowledging that the trial would be a long and difficult process for the family.
The pair did however manage to stay calm and collected despite the horrific circumstances, with Allison saying of Brown; 'He doesn't deserve a reaction.'
.
[h=1]BREAKING NEWS: Controversial Islamic preacher Anjem Choudary is charged with terrorism offence after 'inviting support for ISIS'[/h]
PUBLISHED: 12:57, 5 August 2015 | UPDATED: 13:14, 5 August 2015
Controversial Islamic preacher Anjem Choudary has been charged under the Terrorism Act for 'inviting support for ISIS', Scotland Yard has said.
The 48-year-old extremist from Ilford, north east London, has been detained in custody and is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court at 2pm this afternoon.
He has been charged with the same offence - which can carry a maximum prison sentence of 10 years - alongside another man, Mohammed Rahman, 32, from east London.
+3
Muslim hate preacher Anjem Choudary, pictured arriving at Southwark Police station today to answer bail, has been charged under the Terrorism Act for 'inviting support for ISIS', Scotland Yard has said
Metropolitan Police say the pair 'invited support for a proscribed terrorist organisation, namely ISIL, also known as ISIS or the Islamic State, contrary to section 12 Terrorism Act 2000.'
The offences are alleged to have happened between June 29, 2014 and March 6, this year.
On September, 25, 2014, the suspects were arrested by the Met's Counter-Terrorism Command (SO15) on suspicion of being members of the proscribed organisation.
They have remained on police bail throughout the investigation.
.
Sue Hemming, head of special crime and counter terrorism at the Crown Prosecution Service, said: 'Following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police's counter terrorism command, we have today authorised charges against Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Mizanur Rahman.
'We have concluded that there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to prosecute Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman for inviting support for ISIS.
'It is alleged that Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman invited support for ISIS in individual lectures which were subsequently published online.'
+3
The 48-year-old extremist from Ilford, north east London, has been detained in custody and is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court at 2pm this afternoon
+3
He was arrested in September last year and the alleged offence are said to have happened between June 29, 2014 and March 6, this year
[h=3]'SUPPORTING ISIS': WHAT THE CHARGES MEAN UNDER THE TERRORISM ACT[/h]Under the Terrorism Act 2000, clause 12 'support', states:
(1)A person commits an offence if—
(a)he invites support for a proscribed organisation, and
(b)the support is not, or is not restricted to, the provision of money or other property (within the meaning of section 15).
(2)A person commits an offence if he arranges, manages or assists in arranging or managing a meeting which he knows is—
(a)to support a proscribed organisation,
(b)to further the activities of a proscribed organisation, or
(c)to be addressed by a person who belongs or professes to belong to a proscribed organisation.
(3)A person commits an offence if he addresses a meeting and the purpose of his address is to encourage support for a proscribed organisation or to further its activities.
(4)Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2)(c) in respect of a private meeting it is a defence for him to prove that he had no reasonable cause to believe that the address mentioned in subsection (2)(c) would support a proscribed organisation or further its activities.
(5)In subsections (2) to (4)—
(a)'meeting' means a meeting of three or more persons, whether or not the public are admitted, and
(b)a meeting is private if the public are not admitted.
(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, to a fine or to both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to both.
.
- Muslim hate preacher has been charged under the Terrorism Act today
- The 48-year-old extremist from Ilford has been detained in police custody
- He is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court at 2pm today
- Another man, Mohammed Rahman, 32, also faces the same charge
PUBLISHED: 12:57, 5 August 2015 | UPDATED: 13:14, 5 August 2015
Controversial Islamic preacher Anjem Choudary has been charged under the Terrorism Act for 'inviting support for ISIS', Scotland Yard has said.
The 48-year-old extremist from Ilford, north east London, has been detained in custody and is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court at 2pm this afternoon.
He has been charged with the same offence - which can carry a maximum prison sentence of 10 years - alongside another man, Mohammed Rahman, 32, from east London.
+3
Muslim hate preacher Anjem Choudary, pictured arriving at Southwark Police station today to answer bail, has been charged under the Terrorism Act for 'inviting support for ISIS', Scotland Yard has said
Metropolitan Police say the pair 'invited support for a proscribed terrorist organisation, namely ISIL, also known as ISIS or the Islamic State, contrary to section 12 Terrorism Act 2000.'
The offences are alleged to have happened between June 29, 2014 and March 6, this year.
On September, 25, 2014, the suspects were arrested by the Met's Counter-Terrorism Command (SO15) on suspicion of being members of the proscribed organisation.
They have remained on police bail throughout the investigation.
.
Sue Hemming, head of special crime and counter terrorism at the Crown Prosecution Service, said: 'Following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police's counter terrorism command, we have today authorised charges against Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Mizanur Rahman.
'We have concluded that there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to prosecute Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman for inviting support for ISIS.
'It is alleged that Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman invited support for ISIS in individual lectures which were subsequently published online.'
+3
The 48-year-old extremist from Ilford, north east London, has been detained in custody and is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court at 2pm this afternoon
+3
He was arrested in September last year and the alleged offence are said to have happened between June 29, 2014 and March 6, this year
[h=3]'SUPPORTING ISIS': WHAT THE CHARGES MEAN UNDER THE TERRORISM ACT[/h]Under the Terrorism Act 2000, clause 12 'support', states:
(1)A person commits an offence if—
(a)he invites support for a proscribed organisation, and
(b)the support is not, or is not restricted to, the provision of money or other property (within the meaning of section 15).
(2)A person commits an offence if he arranges, manages or assists in arranging or managing a meeting which he knows is—
(a)to support a proscribed organisation,
(b)to further the activities of a proscribed organisation, or
(c)to be addressed by a person who belongs or professes to belong to a proscribed organisation.
(3)A person commits an offence if he addresses a meeting and the purpose of his address is to encourage support for a proscribed organisation or to further its activities.
(4)Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (2)(c) in respect of a private meeting it is a defence for him to prove that he had no reasonable cause to believe that the address mentioned in subsection (2)(c) would support a proscribed organisation or further its activities.
(5)In subsections (2) to (4)—
(a)'meeting' means a meeting of three or more persons, whether or not the public are admitted, and
(b)a meeting is private if the public are not admitted.
(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, to a fine or to both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to both.
.
Anjem Choudary protests innocence as charged with terror offence
Preacher Anjem Choudary claims David Cameron and police are the guilty ones as he faces charge of inviting support for Isil
Anjem Choudary arrives at Southwark Police Station, south London, answering his bail. Photo: National
By Tom Whitehead, Security Editor
9:53PM BST 05 Aug 2015
Radical preacher Anjem Choudary launched a 20 minute court monologue protesting his innocence after being charged with a terror offence for the first time.
The controversial cleric said he would be pleading that David Cameron, the police and the courts are the guilty ones after being accused of inviting support for the terror group Isil.
The 48-year-old claimed his arrest and charge was a “political manoeuvre to silence Muslim voices” and insisted he would defend himself in court.
• Anjem Choudary charged with supporting a terror organisation
Choudary appeared before Westminster Magistrates along with co-accused Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, 32.
The pair allegedly encouraged Muslims to obey the so-called Islamic State as a caliphate in online messages despite it being a banned terrorist organisation.
It is believed to be the first time Choudary has been charged with a terrorism offence.
When asked how he intended to plead, the former lawyer said: “I will be pleading Cameron, police and the judges are guilty and the only people who are innocent here are me and Mr Rahman.”
Wearing a white Islamic robe, he refused to stand when the magistrate entered and smiled and smirked during the hearing.
He said: “I believe from the top down this is a political manoeuvre from Cameron, the Home Secretary, the police and the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service), to try to silence voices of the Muslim community, of which I am one of the loudest.
“I have a very strong case against the Crown and I would like to have my day in court.”
Choudary and Rahman were arrested, along with seven other men, in September last year on suspicion of being members of a proscribed organisation and have been on police bail since.
At the Westminster court, Choudary said he had openly said he wanted to live under Shariah law and had described what a caliphate was but that was a “world of difference” from saying to people they should go.
Prosecutor David Cawthorne said of the two defendants: “Both are high profile figures and are well aware of their influence across social media and their wider community.”
Chief magistrate Howard Riddle praised Choudary’s representations but refused him bail.
Both Choudary and Rahman were remanded in to custody and will appear at the Old Bailey on August 28.
Prior to being charged, Choudary had said of the investigation: “The whole issue is about people supposedly preaching hate but there's so much hate preached by people, by the far right, by animal rights activists.
"If people have strong views why should they be curtailed?”
On the charge, Sue Hemming, Head of Special Crime and Counter Terrorism at the Crown Prosecution Service, said: “Following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, we have today authorised charges against Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Mizanur Rahman.
“We have concluded that there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to prosecute Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman for inviting support for ISIL, a proscribed terrorist organisation, between 29 June 2014 and 6 March this year. Each man is charged with one offence contrary to section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
“It is alleged that Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman invited support for ISIS in individual lectures which were subsequently published online."
Preacher Anjem Choudary claims David Cameron and police are the guilty ones as he faces charge of inviting support for Isil
By Tom Whitehead, Security Editor
9:53PM BST 05 Aug 2015
Radical preacher Anjem Choudary launched a 20 minute court monologue protesting his innocence after being charged with a terror offence for the first time.
The controversial cleric said he would be pleading that David Cameron, the police and the courts are the guilty ones after being accused of inviting support for the terror group Isil.
The 48-year-old claimed his arrest and charge was a “political manoeuvre to silence Muslim voices” and insisted he would defend himself in court.
• Anjem Choudary charged with supporting a terror organisation
Choudary appeared before Westminster Magistrates along with co-accused Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, 32.
The pair allegedly encouraged Muslims to obey the so-called Islamic State as a caliphate in online messages despite it being a banned terrorist organisation.
It is believed to be the first time Choudary has been charged with a terrorism offence.
When asked how he intended to plead, the former lawyer said: “I will be pleading Cameron, police and the judges are guilty and the only people who are innocent here are me and Mr Rahman.”
Wearing a white Islamic robe, he refused to stand when the magistrate entered and smiled and smirked during the hearing.
He said: “I believe from the top down this is a political manoeuvre from Cameron, the Home Secretary, the police and the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service), to try to silence voices of the Muslim community, of which I am one of the loudest.
“I have a very strong case against the Crown and I would like to have my day in court.”
Choudary and Rahman were arrested, along with seven other men, in September last year on suspicion of being members of a proscribed organisation and have been on police bail since.
At the Westminster court, Choudary said he had openly said he wanted to live under Shariah law and had described what a caliphate was but that was a “world of difference” from saying to people they should go.
Prosecutor David Cawthorne said of the two defendants: “Both are high profile figures and are well aware of their influence across social media and their wider community.”
Chief magistrate Howard Riddle praised Choudary’s representations but refused him bail.
Both Choudary and Rahman were remanded in to custody and will appear at the Old Bailey on August 28.
Prior to being charged, Choudary had said of the investigation: “The whole issue is about people supposedly preaching hate but there's so much hate preached by people, by the far right, by animal rights activists.
"If people have strong views why should they be curtailed?”
On the charge, Sue Hemming, Head of Special Crime and Counter Terrorism at the Crown Prosecution Service, said: “Following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, we have today authorised charges against Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Mizanur Rahman.
“We have concluded that there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to prosecute Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman for inviting support for ISIL, a proscribed terrorist organisation, between 29 June 2014 and 6 March this year. Each man is charged with one offence contrary to section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
“It is alleged that Anjem Choudary and Mohammed Rahman invited support for ISIS in individual lectures which were subsequently published online."
[h=1]ISIS executes 19 girls for refusing to have sex with fighters as UN envoy reveals how sex slaves are 'peddled like barrels of petrol'[/h]
ISIS fanatics have executed 19 women for refusing to have sex with its fighters, a Kurdish official has said.
He claimed the women were being held hostage in Islamic State's stronghold of Mosul, Iraq, which the terror group seized in June last year.
Meanwhile a UN envoy investigating Islamic State's vile sex trade has said 'girls get peddled like barrels of petrol' and one can be bought by six different men.
She also verified a disturbing ISIS document which suggested the extremists sell the Yazidi and Christian women and children they have abducted, with girls aged just one to nine-years-old fetching the most money.
ISIS stormed the Sinjar district in northern Iraq last year and captured hundreds of women belonging to the Yazidi community, who the Islamists view as heretics.
.
+7
Barbaric: ISIS fanatics have reportedly executed 19 women (file photo) for refusing to have sex with its fighters
+7
Enslaved: A UN envoy investigating Islamic State's vile sex trade says 'girls get peddled like barrels of petrol' (file photo purports to show captured girls in ISIS territory)
The sex slaves who somehow escaped Islamic State's clutches have told of how they were forced to marry fighters who physically and sexually abused them.
It is not known whether the 19 women executed - supposedly just a few days ago - were Yazidis or not.
They were put to death because they refused to 'participate in the practice of sexual jihad,' a spokesman for the Kurdish Democratic Party in Mosul told Iraqi News.
Said Mimousini also claimed issues around money and the distribution of women have caused a rift within ISIS's ranks.
In October, the terror group released a pamphlet which showed how much it charged for the purchase of its female captives.
+7
Despicable: The UN's special envoy for sexual violence in conflict, Zainab Bangura, said: 'Sometimes these fighters sell the girls back to their families for thousands of dollars of ransom'
[h=3]ISIS'S DESPICABLE 'PRICE LIST' FOR YAZIDI AND CHRISTIAN SLAVES [/h]
+7
A translated version of the document (left) was shared online by humanitarian and peace prize winner Dr Widad Akrawi, and reads as follows:
We have received news that the demand in Women and Cattle market has sharply decreased and that will affect Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of mujahideen in the battlefield, therefore we have made some changes. Below are the prices for Yazidi and Christian women.
The price for Yazidi or Christian women between the age of 40 - 50 is $43 (£27)
$75 (48) for 30 to 40-year-olds
$86 (£55) for 20 to 30-year-olds
$130 (£83) for ten to 20-year-olds
$172 (£110) for one to nine-year-olds
Customers are allowed to purchase only three items with the exception of customers from Turkey, Syria and Gulf countries.
Dated and sealed by ISIS in Iraq October 16, 2014.
Its authenticity was debated until April, when the UN's special envoy for sexual violence in conflict confirmed it was genuine during a trip to Iraq.
Zainab Bangura told Bloomberg: 'The girls get peddled like barrels of petrol... One girl can be sold and bought by five or six different men.
'Sometimes these fighters sell the girls back to their families for thousands of dollars of ransom.'
The shocking document described the women it abducted as 'items' and claimed a decrease in demand of 'women and cattle' affected 'Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of mujahideen in the battlefield'.
It then gives the prices of women and children by age, with one to nine-year-olds costing the most - around £110. The older the women, the lower the price.
+7
Escape: ISIS stormed the Sinjar district (pictured in August) in northern Iraq last year and captured hundreds of women belonging to the Yazidi community
+7
Exodus: The Yazidi people (pictured in Sinjar last year) practice an ancient religion which is a mixture of Islam and Christianity - and ISIS view them as heretics
The pamphlet - published on October 16 - goes on to say: 'Customers are allowed to purchase only three items with the exception of customers from Turkey, Syria and Gulf countries.
Bangura said the fighters get to choose first and then 'wealthy Middle-Easterners are allowed to
The UN envoy has previously said the best looking Yazidi virgins are sent to depraved slave auctions in Islamic State's adopted capital of Raqqa in Syria, where they are stripped naked and sold to the highest bidder.
They have a marriage bureau which organizes all of these ‘marriages’ and the sale of women... They have a price list
She said Islamic State, which controls over four million people living inside its territory in Iraq and Syria, is unlike any other terror group.
Bangura added: 'They [ISIS] have a machinery... They have a manual on how you treat these women. They have a marriage bureau which organizes all of these ‘marriages’ and the sale of women... They have a price list.'
An ISIS video released in November last year appeared to show an ISIS 'sex slave market' where fighters can choose among different Yazidi girls who are priced according to 'desirable' physical features.
Since then, several women who managed to escape their abusive captors have told of the pain and suffering they endured under ISIS rule.
Only last month, three Yazidi women who were forced to become jihadi said they were raped 'five times a day' after being traded as human cargo.
IS fighters talk about which female slaves to buy and sell
.
+7
Twisted: An ISIS video released in November last year appeared to show an ISIS 'sex slave market' where excited fighters bargained over Yazidi sex slaves
The young women - Bushra, 21, Munira, 17, and Noor, 22 - were tied up, gang raped and burnt with cigarettes after being forced to marry ISIS fighters. Their names have been changed to protect their identity.
After escaping Iraq, the women were flown to the UK by international charity AMAR, which helps people rebuild their lives following conflict.
Bushra, who tried to kill herself when she was sold to an ISIS extremist, said: 'The man who had bought me took me to hospital.
He raped me about five times a day... My sister was barely 14 when they raped her... I could hear her screaming but I couldn't do anything as I was tied up
Bushra, former Yazidi sex slave
'He told me he was going to rape me that same day, however ill I made myself. He took me home, tied up my hands and feet, and raped me.
'He raped me about five times a day. My sister was barely 14 when they raped her... I could hear her screaming but I couldn't do anything as I was tied up.'
Thousands of women and girls from the Yazidi community - an ancient Kurdish ethnic group based in the north of Iraq - have had their lives shattered by ISIS fighters, Amnesty International has said.
The organisation says hundreds, and possibly thousands, have been forced to marry, 'sold' or given as 'gifts' to Islamic State fighters or their supporters - and many held as sexual slaves are girls younger than 14.
Amnesty's researcher Donatella Rovera spoke to more than 40 women who were fortunate enough to escape ISIS captivity in Iraq.
She discovered that some of these abused women and girls were so severely and irreparably traumatised that they have been driven to end their own lives.
.
- The women refused to practice 'sexual jihad', a Kurdish official has claimed
- He also claimed money, distribution of women has created a rift within ISIS
- ISIS published 'price list' of captured Yazidi, Christian sex slaves last year
- UN envoy verified the document as genuine after spending time in region
ISIS fanatics have executed 19 women for refusing to have sex with its fighters, a Kurdish official has said.
He claimed the women were being held hostage in Islamic State's stronghold of Mosul, Iraq, which the terror group seized in June last year.
Meanwhile a UN envoy investigating Islamic State's vile sex trade has said 'girls get peddled like barrels of petrol' and one can be bought by six different men.
She also verified a disturbing ISIS document which suggested the extremists sell the Yazidi and Christian women and children they have abducted, with girls aged just one to nine-years-old fetching the most money.
ISIS stormed the Sinjar district in northern Iraq last year and captured hundreds of women belonging to the Yazidi community, who the Islamists view as heretics.
.
- SHARE PICTURE
+7
Barbaric: ISIS fanatics have reportedly executed 19 women (file photo) for refusing to have sex with its fighters
+7
Enslaved: A UN envoy investigating Islamic State's vile sex trade says 'girls get peddled like barrels of petrol' (file photo purports to show captured girls in ISIS territory)
The sex slaves who somehow escaped Islamic State's clutches have told of how they were forced to marry fighters who physically and sexually abused them.
It is not known whether the 19 women executed - supposedly just a few days ago - were Yazidis or not.
They were put to death because they refused to 'participate in the practice of sexual jihad,' a spokesman for the Kurdish Democratic Party in Mosul told Iraqi News.
Said Mimousini also claimed issues around money and the distribution of women have caused a rift within ISIS's ranks.
In October, the terror group released a pamphlet which showed how much it charged for the purchase of its female captives.
+7
Despicable: The UN's special envoy for sexual violence in conflict, Zainab Bangura, said: 'Sometimes these fighters sell the girls back to their families for thousands of dollars of ransom'
[h=3]ISIS'S DESPICABLE 'PRICE LIST' FOR YAZIDI AND CHRISTIAN SLAVES [/h]
+7
A translated version of the document (left) was shared online by humanitarian and peace prize winner Dr Widad Akrawi, and reads as follows:
We have received news that the demand in Women and Cattle market has sharply decreased and that will affect Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of mujahideen in the battlefield, therefore we have made some changes. Below are the prices for Yazidi and Christian women.
The price for Yazidi or Christian women between the age of 40 - 50 is $43 (£27)
$75 (48) for 30 to 40-year-olds
$86 (£55) for 20 to 30-year-olds
$130 (£83) for ten to 20-year-olds
$172 (£110) for one to nine-year-olds
Customers are allowed to purchase only three items with the exception of customers from Turkey, Syria and Gulf countries.
Dated and sealed by ISIS in Iraq October 16, 2014.
Its authenticity was debated until April, when the UN's special envoy for sexual violence in conflict confirmed it was genuine during a trip to Iraq.
Zainab Bangura told Bloomberg: 'The girls get peddled like barrels of petrol... One girl can be sold and bought by five or six different men.
'Sometimes these fighters sell the girls back to their families for thousands of dollars of ransom.'
The shocking document described the women it abducted as 'items' and claimed a decrease in demand of 'women and cattle' affected 'Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of mujahideen in the battlefield'.
It then gives the prices of women and children by age, with one to nine-year-olds costing the most - around £110. The older the women, the lower the price.
+7
Escape: ISIS stormed the Sinjar district (pictured in August) in northern Iraq last year and captured hundreds of women belonging to the Yazidi community
+7
Exodus: The Yazidi people (pictured in Sinjar last year) practice an ancient religion which is a mixture of Islam and Christianity - and ISIS view them as heretics
The pamphlet - published on October 16 - goes on to say: 'Customers are allowed to purchase only three items with the exception of customers from Turkey, Syria and Gulf countries.
Bangura said the fighters get to choose first and then 'wealthy Middle-Easterners are allowed to
The UN envoy has previously said the best looking Yazidi virgins are sent to depraved slave auctions in Islamic State's adopted capital of Raqqa in Syria, where they are stripped naked and sold to the highest bidder.
They have a marriage bureau which organizes all of these ‘marriages’ and the sale of women... They have a price list
She said Islamic State, which controls over four million people living inside its territory in Iraq and Syria, is unlike any other terror group.
Bangura added: 'They [ISIS] have a machinery... They have a manual on how you treat these women. They have a marriage bureau which organizes all of these ‘marriages’ and the sale of women... They have a price list.'
An ISIS video released in November last year appeared to show an ISIS 'sex slave market' where fighters can choose among different Yazidi girls who are priced according to 'desirable' physical features.
Since then, several women who managed to escape their abusive captors have told of the pain and suffering they endured under ISIS rule.
Only last month, three Yazidi women who were forced to become jihadi said they were raped 'five times a day' after being traded as human cargo.
IS fighters talk about which female slaves to buy and sell
.
- SHARE PICTURE
+7
Twisted: An ISIS video released in November last year appeared to show an ISIS 'sex slave market' where excited fighters bargained over Yazidi sex slaves
The young women - Bushra, 21, Munira, 17, and Noor, 22 - were tied up, gang raped and burnt with cigarettes after being forced to marry ISIS fighters. Their names have been changed to protect their identity.
After escaping Iraq, the women were flown to the UK by international charity AMAR, which helps people rebuild their lives following conflict.
Bushra, who tried to kill herself when she was sold to an ISIS extremist, said: 'The man who had bought me took me to hospital.
He raped me about five times a day... My sister was barely 14 when they raped her... I could hear her screaming but I couldn't do anything as I was tied up
Bushra, former Yazidi sex slave
'He told me he was going to rape me that same day, however ill I made myself. He took me home, tied up my hands and feet, and raped me.
'He raped me about five times a day. My sister was barely 14 when they raped her... I could hear her screaming but I couldn't do anything as I was tied up.'
Thousands of women and girls from the Yazidi community - an ancient Kurdish ethnic group based in the north of Iraq - have had their lives shattered by ISIS fighters, Amnesty International has said.
The organisation says hundreds, and possibly thousands, have been forced to marry, 'sold' or given as 'gifts' to Islamic State fighters or their supporters - and many held as sexual slaves are girls younger than 14.
Amnesty's researcher Donatella Rovera spoke to more than 40 women who were fortunate enough to escape ISIS captivity in Iraq.
She discovered that some of these abused women and girls were so severely and irreparably traumatised that they have been driven to end their own lives.
.
Thousands of women and girls from the Yazidi community - an ancient Kurdish ethnic group based in the north of Iraq - have had their lives shattered by ISIS fighters, Amnesty International has said.
The organisation says hundreds, and possibly thousands, have been forced to marry, 'sold' or given as 'gifts' to Islamic State fighters or their supporters - and many held as sexual slaves are girls younger than 14.
Amnesty's researcher Donatella Rovera spoke to more than 40 women who were fortunate enough to escape ISIS captivity in Iraq.
She discovered that some of these abused women and girls were so severely and irreparably traumatised that they have been driven to end their own lives.
Abhorrent. Terrible tragedy! If I were the president of the United States I would move heaven and earth to prevent something like this from ever occuring. But that's just me.....
The organisation says hundreds, and possibly thousands, have been forced to marry, 'sold' or given as 'gifts' to Islamic State fighters or their supporters - and many held as sexual slaves are girls younger than 14.
Amnesty's researcher Donatella Rovera spoke to more than 40 women who were fortunate enough to escape ISIS captivity in Iraq.
She discovered that some of these abused women and girls were so severely and irreparably traumatised that they have been driven to end their own lives.
Abhorrent. Terrible tragedy! If I were the president of the United States I would move heaven and earth to prevent something like this from ever occuring. But that's just me.....
[h=1]Shocking video shows terrified women surrounded by jeering men as they walk along promenade in Saudi Arabia… where THEY have been blamed for 'provoking' the men despite wearing burkha and face veils[/h]
PUBLISHED: 10:27, 7 August 2015 | UPDATED: 13:11, 7 August 2015
Appalling YouTube footage has captured the moment two terrified women are hounded by a horde of jeering men as they walk along a promenade in Saudi Arabia.
In the minute-long video, the two young women - dressed in traditional burkhas and face veils - become visibly distressed as they are harassed and intimidated by the men in the city of Jeddah.
The clip recently went viral in the country and sparked public outrage, prompting a police investigation which reportedly led to six boys being detained and questioned.
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px;">
Appalling YouTube footage has captured the moment two terrified women are hounded by a horde of jeering men as they walk along a promenade in Saudi Arabia.
In the minute-long video, the two young women - dressed in traditional burkhas and face veils - become visibly distressed as they are harassed and intimidated by the men in the city of Jeddah.
The clip recently went viral in the country and sparked public outrage, prompting a police investigation which reportedly led to six boys being detained and questioned.
.
But shockingly, the women are now being blamed for 'provoking' the primal reaction from the crowd by being 'indecent'.
The outlandish claim is being supported by the emergence of a new video supposedly taken from the scene, which has been shown on semi-official news channels.
The second video purports to show the same women riding a quad-bike to the promenade, with one of them tossing their agal towards the men in a 'seductive and tempting' manner.
.
An agal is the black rope worn by Saudi men over their traditional checkered head cloths.
Thanks to the emergence of this new video, the women were no longer seen as victims by viewers in Saudi Arabia and were accused of provoking the men.
Judicial adviser Yehia al-Shahrani told the state-linked Sabq news website he thinks the women behaved in a 'seductive and tempting' manner.
.
+8
Outlandish claim: Shockingly, the women are now being blamed for 'provoking' the primal reaction from the crowd by being 'indecent'
He claimed it would be unfair to investigate or try the men 'without taking the same deserved action against those who seduced and aroused this to happen, which are the two girls.'
He also blamed the young women's parents for letting their daughters go to a public place around young men.
The first video sparked a rare public debate on the rights of women in a country which upholds strict segregation of men and women.
Saudi women's rights activists say sexual harassment is commonplace in the kingdom and are urging authorities to criminalize such behaviour.
Whether a Saudi woman wears a burkha or not, she is still seen as 'just a subject to harass,' activist Tamador Alyami told The Associated Press.
She added: 'Harassment is something you see on a daily basis. It's expected and accepted. That's how common it is. It only makes controversy when it's caught on camera.'
Many other harassment videos have emerged on social media in the past.
In one, from the central city of Taif, a young woman is aggressively followed by a group of young men near a shopping centre.
+8
Prompted discussion: The incident took place in the Red Sea city of Jeddah (pictured) and has sparked debate about women's rights in Saudi Arabia
+8
Panicked: The veiled women are surrounded by the crowd of jeering men in the appalling video
+8
Endemic: Saudi women's rights activists say sexual harassment is commonplace in the kingdom and are urging authorities to criminalize such behaviour
Police said two men were arrested for the incident, though neither the girl nor her family reported it to police.
Saudi women were recently granted the right to run and vote in municipal elections but their lives are still largely controlled by the men in their family.
'Guardianship laws' state that women need permission of male relatives to travel abroad or work, and many private hospitals say women who want medical procedures must have permission from a man.
Senior officials in the kingdom's clerical establishment claim such legislation protects females as women would be more exposed to sexual harassment if they had more freedom.
Many Saudi commentators are calling for an anti-sexual harassment law. In the absence of legislation, the harassers in the video face little or no punishment.
One backer of the initiative, Shura Council member Thuraya Ebrahim al Arrayed, said that the lack of a clear law means penalties for rape and secual abuse are up to the discretion of judges interpreting Islamic law.
Ms Ebrahim al Arrayed said a law would 'clarify the details because it would punish any harassment, whether it is sexual assault of minors or adults, including that of children and minors inside and outside their home'.
The Shura Council shelved a new bill about sexual harassment last year after members claimed it would encourage women to wear more provocative attire and mingle with men.
+8
Harrassment is rife: Whether a Saudi woman wears a burkha or not, she is still seen as 'just a subject to harass,' activist Tamador Alyami
+8
Surrounded and scared: In the minute-long video, the two young women - dressed in traditional burkhas and face veils - become visibly distressed as they are harassed and intimidated by the men
+8
Cruel: A smiling man gleefully films the anguished woman hs she attempts to escape the crowd
.
- YouTube footage prompted outrage among Saudi women's right activists
- Led to police investigation which reportedly saw six boys questioned
- Then new clip emerged purporting to show same women arriving at scene
- In second video, the veiled women are said to have acted in 'seductive and tempting manner' - 'provoking' the crowd of men
PUBLISHED: 10:27, 7 August 2015 | UPDATED: 13:11, 7 August 2015
Appalling YouTube footage has captured the moment two terrified women are hounded by a horde of jeering men as they walk along a promenade in Saudi Arabia.
In the minute-long video, the two young women - dressed in traditional burkhas and face veils - become visibly distressed as they are harassed and intimidated by the men in the city of Jeddah.
The clip recently went viral in the country and sparked public outrage, prompting a police investigation which reportedly led to six boys being detained and questioned.
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px;">
Appalling YouTube footage has captured the moment two terrified women are hounded by a horde of jeering men as they walk along a promenade in Saudi Arabia.
In the minute-long video, the two young women - dressed in traditional burkhas and face veils - become visibly distressed as they are harassed and intimidated by the men in the city of Jeddah.
The clip recently went viral in the country and sparked public outrage, prompting a police investigation which reportedly led to six boys being detained and questioned.
.
But shockingly, the women are now being blamed for 'provoking' the primal reaction from the crowd by being 'indecent'.
The outlandish claim is being supported by the emergence of a new video supposedly taken from the scene, which has been shown on semi-official news channels.
The second video purports to show the same women riding a quad-bike to the promenade, with one of them tossing their agal towards the men in a 'seductive and tempting' manner.
.
An agal is the black rope worn by Saudi men over their traditional checkered head cloths.
Thanks to the emergence of this new video, the women were no longer seen as victims by viewers in Saudi Arabia and were accused of provoking the men.
Judicial adviser Yehia al-Shahrani told the state-linked Sabq news website he thinks the women behaved in a 'seductive and tempting' manner.
.
+8
Outlandish claim: Shockingly, the women are now being blamed for 'provoking' the primal reaction from the crowd by being 'indecent'
He claimed it would be unfair to investigate or try the men 'without taking the same deserved action against those who seduced and aroused this to happen, which are the two girls.'
He also blamed the young women's parents for letting their daughters go to a public place around young men.
The first video sparked a rare public debate on the rights of women in a country which upholds strict segregation of men and women.
Saudi women's rights activists say sexual harassment is commonplace in the kingdom and are urging authorities to criminalize such behaviour.
Whether a Saudi woman wears a burkha or not, she is still seen as 'just a subject to harass,' activist Tamador Alyami told The Associated Press.
She added: 'Harassment is something you see on a daily basis. It's expected and accepted. That's how common it is. It only makes controversy when it's caught on camera.'
Many other harassment videos have emerged on social media in the past.
In one, from the central city of Taif, a young woman is aggressively followed by a group of young men near a shopping centre.
+8
Prompted discussion: The incident took place in the Red Sea city of Jeddah (pictured) and has sparked debate about women's rights in Saudi Arabia
+8
Panicked: The veiled women are surrounded by the crowd of jeering men in the appalling video
+8
Endemic: Saudi women's rights activists say sexual harassment is commonplace in the kingdom and are urging authorities to criminalize such behaviour
Police said two men were arrested for the incident, though neither the girl nor her family reported it to police.
Saudi women were recently granted the right to run and vote in municipal elections but their lives are still largely controlled by the men in their family.
'Guardianship laws' state that women need permission of male relatives to travel abroad or work, and many private hospitals say women who want medical procedures must have permission from a man.
Senior officials in the kingdom's clerical establishment claim such legislation protects females as women would be more exposed to sexual harassment if they had more freedom.
Many Saudi commentators are calling for an anti-sexual harassment law. In the absence of legislation, the harassers in the video face little or no punishment.
One backer of the initiative, Shura Council member Thuraya Ebrahim al Arrayed, said that the lack of a clear law means penalties for rape and secual abuse are up to the discretion of judges interpreting Islamic law.
Ms Ebrahim al Arrayed said a law would 'clarify the details because it would punish any harassment, whether it is sexual assault of minors or adults, including that of children and minors inside and outside their home'.
The Shura Council shelved a new bill about sexual harassment last year after members claimed it would encourage women to wear more provocative attire and mingle with men.
+8
Harrassment is rife: Whether a Saudi woman wears a burkha or not, she is still seen as 'just a subject to harass,' activist Tamador Alyami
+8
Surrounded and scared: In the minute-long video, the two young women - dressed in traditional burkhas and face veils - become visibly distressed as they are harassed and intimidated by the men
+8
Cruel: A smiling man gleefully films the anguished woman hs she attempts to escape the crowd
.
Bangladesh blogger Niloy Neel hacked to death in Dhaka
Niloy Neel was an atheist from a Hindu background
A Bangladeshi blogger known for his atheist views has been hacked to death by a gang armed with machetes in the capital Dhaka, police say.
Niloy Neel was attacked at his home in the city's Goran area.
He is the fourth secularist blogger to have been killed this year by suspected Islamist militants in Bangladesh.
Imran H Sarkar, head of the Bangladesh Blogger and Activist Network, told the BBC that Mr Neel had been an anti-extremist voice of reason.
"He was the voice against fundamentalism and extremism and was even a voice for minority rights - especially women's rights and the rights of indigenous people," he said.
BBC World Service South Asia editor Charles Haviland says that, like previous victims, Mr Neel was not only secular but atheist and, like two of the others, he was from a Hindu, not a Muslim, background.
Analysis: Mukul Devichand, editor, BBC Trending
All four men killed were on a list of 84 "atheist bloggers" drawn up by Islamic groups in 2013 and widely circulated.
It was originally submitted to the government with the aim of having the bloggers arrested and tried for blasphemy. The groups which wanted bloggers arrested told us they have no knowledge of who is behind the killings.
There is also a more complex backdrop to the killings. Islamic groups label all these bloggers "atheists" - and many did indeed use the internet to criticise those who believe in God.
But in fact, not all the bloggers were atheists. What they did have in common was they were part of a wider, secular movement that took to the streets in protest in 2013.
Bangladesh's murdered bloggers
The BBC's Akbar Hossain in Dhaka says Mr Neel had filed a police report expressing fear for his life, but his complaints had not been not followed up.
Police said about six attackers had tricked their way into Mr Neel's home by saying they were looking to rent a flat.
"Two of them then took him to a room and then slaughtered him there," deputy police commissioner Muntashirul Islam said.
"His wife was in the flat but she was confined to another room."
The killing of blogger Avijit Roy in February triggered protests in Bangladesh
In May, secular blogger Ananta Bijoy Das was killed by masked men with machetes in Sylhet. He was said to have received death threats from Islamist extremists.
In March, another blogger, Washiqur Rahman, was hacked to death in Dhaka. Blogger Avijit Roy, who courted controversy by championing atheism and also tackling issues such as homosexuality, was killed in Dhaka in February.
Bangladesh is officially secular but critics say the government is indifferent to attacks on bloggers by Islamist militants.
Two people have been arrested, but no-one charged, in connection with this year's killings, our correspondent adds.
- 2 hours ago
- From the sectionAsia
A Bangladeshi blogger known for his atheist views has been hacked to death by a gang armed with machetes in the capital Dhaka, police say.
Niloy Neel was attacked at his home in the city's Goran area.
He is the fourth secularist blogger to have been killed this year by suspected Islamist militants in Bangladesh.
Imran H Sarkar, head of the Bangladesh Blogger and Activist Network, told the BBC that Mr Neel had been an anti-extremist voice of reason.
"He was the voice against fundamentalism and extremism and was even a voice for minority rights - especially women's rights and the rights of indigenous people," he said.
BBC World Service South Asia editor Charles Haviland says that, like previous victims, Mr Neel was not only secular but atheist and, like two of the others, he was from a Hindu, not a Muslim, background.
All four men killed were on a list of 84 "atheist bloggers" drawn up by Islamic groups in 2013 and widely circulated.
It was originally submitted to the government with the aim of having the bloggers arrested and tried for blasphemy. The groups which wanted bloggers arrested told us they have no knowledge of who is behind the killings.
There is also a more complex backdrop to the killings. Islamic groups label all these bloggers "atheists" - and many did indeed use the internet to criticise those who believe in God.
But in fact, not all the bloggers were atheists. What they did have in common was they were part of a wider, secular movement that took to the streets in protest in 2013.
Bangladesh's murdered bloggers
Police said about six attackers had tricked their way into Mr Neel's home by saying they were looking to rent a flat.
"Two of them then took him to a room and then slaughtered him there," deputy police commissioner Muntashirul Islam said.
"His wife was in the flat but she was confined to another room."
In May, secular blogger Ananta Bijoy Das was killed by masked men with machetes in Sylhet. He was said to have received death threats from Islamist extremists.
In March, another blogger, Washiqur Rahman, was hacked to death in Dhaka. Blogger Avijit Roy, who courted controversy by championing atheism and also tackling issues such as homosexuality, was killed in Dhaka in February.
Bangladesh is officially secular but critics say the government is indifferent to attacks on bloggers by Islamist militants.
Two people have been arrested, but no-one charged, in connection with this year's killings, our correspondent adds.
Ever wonder the real reason Muslim women wear the burqa?
PC libtard answer: It's their religion!
Well, yeah...because pedophile Mohamed's 'religion' promotes a rape culture. To wit: completely covering themselves head to toe ensures uncontrollable young Muslim men aren't tempted to rape...at least in theory. These people are fucking animals you wouldn't want near your wives, mothers or daughters. Just ask Laura Logan from 60 Minutes.
Want to promote rape culture in America like the Germans have? Open the floodgates to Muslims!
Offended? You should be!
Especially you poseur "women's rights" hypocrites!
Something to think about the next time some terrorist at CAIR says it's "for their religion"
ucking:
PC libtard answer: It's their religion!
Well, yeah...because pedophile Mohamed's 'religion' promotes a rape culture. To wit: completely covering themselves head to toe ensures uncontrollable young Muslim men aren't tempted to rape...at least in theory. These people are fucking animals you wouldn't want near your wives, mothers or daughters. Just ask Laura Logan from 60 Minutes.
Want to promote rape culture in America like the Germans have? Open the floodgates to Muslims!
Offended? You should be!
Especially you poseur "women's rights" hypocrites!
Something to think about the next time some terrorist at CAIR says it's "for their religion"
ucking:
Graphic video! Palestinian terrorist run over ppl get out of the car to stab them and shot dead image:
happened in jerusalem this morning...apparently the terrorist used crystal meth that's why it took 5 bullets,he was working in a Israeli telecom company "bezeq"
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=372_1444745300#yJ1ssw54Wj2vjBEo.99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Animals!!!!
happened in jerusalem this morning...apparently the terrorist used crystal meth that's why it took 5 bullets,he was working in a Israeli telecom company "bezeq"
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=372_1444745300#yJ1ssw54Wj2vjBEo.99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Animals!!!!
[ filthy maggots are taking over Europe ]
Denmark: 77 percent of Muslims think that the Quran’s instructions must be “applied fully”
OCTOBER 12, 2015 9:26 AM BY NICOLAI SENNELS78 COMMENTS
Research show that Islam is the only religion where people become more violent the more they practice their faith.
Translated from JP:
Denmark: 77 percent of Muslims think that the Quran’s instructions must be “applied fully”
OCTOBER 12, 2015 9:26 AM BY NICOLAI SENNELS78 COMMENTS
Research show that Islam is the only religion where people become more violent the more they practice their faith.
Translated from JP:Muslims in Denmark have begun to pay more attention to their religion and religious practices.
A poll among Muslims in Denmark shows this… it is comparable to a similar survey from almost 10 years ago, in 2006.
Back then it was 37 percent who prayed daily five times or more. Now 50 percent are praying five times a day or more. Similarly, an increasing proportion – 77 percent – think that the Quran’s instructions must be applied fully, as compared to 62 percent in 2006. Finally, there are also some who believe that Muslim girls from adolescence onward should cover themselves with headscarves.
A poll among Muslims in Denmark shows this… it is comparable to a similar survey from almost 10 years ago, in 2006.
Back then it was 37 percent who prayed daily five times or more. Now 50 percent are praying five times a day or more. Similarly, an increasing proportion – 77 percent – think that the Quran’s instructions must be applied fully, as compared to 62 percent in 2006. Finally, there are also some who believe that Muslim girls from adolescence onward should cover themselves with headscarves.
10/13 show, move cursor to 20 minutes mark. Mark Levin destroys the moral relavitism put out by the anti-Semitic state dept and the POS in the White House:
http://www.marklevinshow.com/audio-rewind/
http://www.marklevinshow.com/audio-rewind/
