Here is a good post I came across. It is about the best candidates for Big 12 expansion candidates.
I made a formula to evaluate Big XII expansion candidates.
Basically it will compute a score (the higher the better) based on a few critera that I selected.
The formula is: (Average Football attendance in 2014 + Current Undergrad enrollment) / (Distance to Norman + US News and World Report Ranking)
I picked these factors specifically because it seems to be a decent balance between distance to the approximate geographic center of the Big XII conference, interest in football specifically, academics, and overall student (then eventually alumni) population.
Realistic contenders for Expansion:
1) Memphis - 76.11 - helped immensely by it's proximity, hurt by its academic reputation
2) BYU - 76.01 - helped by its academic rating & football interest, hurt by it's distance (could add for football only)
3) UCF - 61.78 - helped by its massive undergrad enrollment, hurt by academics and proximity
4) Colorado State - 57.97 - Was basically middle of the road in every metric, attendance was low
5) New Mexico - 57.59 - Attendance was awful - similar to Colorado State, but hurt more by academics
6) Cincinnati - 51.48 - Also middle of the road in everything, attendance was lower than average
7) East Carolina - 44.08 - Helped by attendance, hurt by distance and academics
8) USF - 42.68 - Helped by enrollment size, hurt by distance, academics and attendance
9) Boise State - 30.26 - Below average to bottom tier at everything, especially distance and academics
10) Connecticut - 27.59 - Helped by Academics (best of the bunch), hurt by distance, enrollment and attendance
Just for shits and giggles, this is how some other teams of interest would compute using the same formula:
Texas A&M - 351.62 - Elite in every category
Arkansas - 231.56 - Always thought they'd be a good fit, too late now
TCU - 204.44 - low enrollment, but elite in distance and solid in academics
Nebraska - 200.77 - Solid across the board, attendance is elite
Missouri - 162.99 - Not quite as good as Nebraska, but definitely strong
Colorado - 79.50 - They were never a great fit culturally either
Maybe we should be looking at poaching some ACC Schools that aren't part of the Tobacco Road mafia...
Florida State - 104.69
Clemson - 94.10
Louisville - 73.72
Virgnia Tech - 73.13
GA Tech - 71.11
Pittsburgh - 50.92 (Distance hurts a lot, attendance numbers weren't great)
Miami - 41.74 (Distance too far)
I didn't put any schools in Texas other than Texas A&M and TCU - the Big XII should look for additional recruiting grounds and tv markets in states outside it's footprint. Follow the Big Ten / SEC model.
Obviously other factors have to be considered - but I thought it would be interesting to assign a numerical value to the process of examining expansion.
I made a formula to evaluate Big XII expansion candidates.
Basically it will compute a score (the higher the better) based on a few critera that I selected.
The formula is: (Average Football attendance in 2014 + Current Undergrad enrollment) / (Distance to Norman + US News and World Report Ranking)
I picked these factors specifically because it seems to be a decent balance between distance to the approximate geographic center of the Big XII conference, interest in football specifically, academics, and overall student (then eventually alumni) population.
Realistic contenders for Expansion:
1) Memphis - 76.11 - helped immensely by it's proximity, hurt by its academic reputation
2) BYU - 76.01 - helped by its academic rating & football interest, hurt by it's distance (could add for football only)
3) UCF - 61.78 - helped by its massive undergrad enrollment, hurt by academics and proximity
4) Colorado State - 57.97 - Was basically middle of the road in every metric, attendance was low
5) New Mexico - 57.59 - Attendance was awful - similar to Colorado State, but hurt more by academics
6) Cincinnati - 51.48 - Also middle of the road in everything, attendance was lower than average
7) East Carolina - 44.08 - Helped by attendance, hurt by distance and academics
8) USF - 42.68 - Helped by enrollment size, hurt by distance, academics and attendance
9) Boise State - 30.26 - Below average to bottom tier at everything, especially distance and academics
10) Connecticut - 27.59 - Helped by Academics (best of the bunch), hurt by distance, enrollment and attendance
Just for shits and giggles, this is how some other teams of interest would compute using the same formula:
Texas A&M - 351.62 - Elite in every category
Arkansas - 231.56 - Always thought they'd be a good fit, too late now
TCU - 204.44 - low enrollment, but elite in distance and solid in academics
Nebraska - 200.77 - Solid across the board, attendance is elite
Missouri - 162.99 - Not quite as good as Nebraska, but definitely strong
Colorado - 79.50 - They were never a great fit culturally either
Maybe we should be looking at poaching some ACC Schools that aren't part of the Tobacco Road mafia...
Florida State - 104.69
Clemson - 94.10
Louisville - 73.72
Virgnia Tech - 73.13
GA Tech - 71.11
Pittsburgh - 50.92 (Distance hurts a lot, attendance numbers weren't great)
Miami - 41.74 (Distance too far)
I didn't put any schools in Texas other than Texas A&M and TCU - the Big XII should look for additional recruiting grounds and tv markets in states outside it's footprint. Follow the Big Ten / SEC model.
Obviously other factors have to be considered - but I thought it would be interesting to assign a numerical value to the process of examining expansion.