Well that escalated quickly. Sorry Seer. I don't doubt point shaving exists but I think you think it happens way more than it actually does. That BYU game last night was a prime example. A ton of action on BYU and they looked like they were about to give up a vegas style back door cover but they didn't. I've seen games that had 95% of public on one side and the fishiest line in the world. I've taken other side of the "trap" bet only to lose because I bet on a shitty team that couldn't save vegas. I do notice those trap bets do end up being traps more times than not but I think it's only considered a trap because of public perception. The majority of public bettors think team A will smash on Team B but the statistical matchup indicates something closer to the line odds makers set. Public refuses to accept that because of their perception of team A being superior.
ah!!yeah not ur fault no need to apologize. the aha moment was...i had the under....the public also leaned there too. and prolly many noted the inflated total so i am sure the money went on the under. by playing soft d and as noted the game was an under except for a frantic
ending to make sure it went over? it was a bad beat for sure. either way you could be right that there was nothing wrong with the game but as i said at the top of my post b4 i make my selection - if i am on a public team i reduce my bet wager most of the time