When Mueller testifies, he will be set up to make short statements to smear Trump, and when taken out of context... will be devastating.
Then, the MSM will show it as propaganda 24/7 for weeks, months.
A few from the GOP will make attempts to counter but nothing much will be extracted, and even if so, will not be shown much at all. Fox night shows, but the rest of the day it will not be show.
Then, the MSM will show it as propaganda 24/7 for weeks, months.
A few from the GOP will make attempts to counter but nothing much will be extracted, and even if so, will not be shown much at all. Fox night shows, but the rest of the day it will not be show.
Devin Nunes Just Caught Robert Mueller Lying to American Public on Joseph Misfud
[video=youtube;1GFP6BwVL8U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=374&v=1GFP6BwVL8U[/video]
Just how many intel agencies, both foreign and domestic, did Obama involve illegally to spy on Americans, including Donald Trump?
hno:
[video=youtube;1GFP6BwVL8U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=374&v=1GFP6BwVL8U[/video]
Just how many intel agencies, both foreign and domestic, did Obama involve illegally to spy on Americans, including Donald Trump?
hno:
So Mueller mislead the country? I say fire the bum! Oh wait, it's a little late for that.Devin Nunes Just Caught Robert Mueller Lying to American Public on Joseph Misfud
[video=youtube;1GFP6BwVL8U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=374&v=1GFP6BwVL8U[/video]
Just how many intel agencies, both foreign and domestic, did Obama involve illegally to spy on Americans, including Donald Trump?
this issue has ran its course.. anyone with any common sense won't get persuaded either way with what Mueller says.. actually think Mueller will look bad on the stand , fact is the GOP are a lot more clever then these other losers , now that we know they're to CHICKEN to even ask Barr questions themselves
MUST READ: Mueller’s Reprehensible Ultimatum to General Flynn: Your Son or Your Country? Make Your Decision!
by Jim Hoft May 18, 2019 259 Comments
General Flynn was given an ultimatum by the corrupt Mueller team – choose either your son or your country! This grotesque abuse of power and the legal system by the Mueller gang should never have happened and should not go unpunished!
General Flynn worked for the Obama Administration but at some point was fired by Obama for apparently disagreeing with his policies and actions and speaking out against his failed policies in Iraq and Syria. Soon after, then candidate Trump ran for office and General Flynn supported the future President and introduced the candidate at rallies and then was offered a position on the Trump team.
Obama was upset with Flynn for supporting Trump and it appears that he had some sort of vendetta with Flynn for his comments on the growing threat of ISIS. It’s also suspected that after Flynn parted ways with President Obama he was set up at a dinner with Russians where he was seated next to Russian President Putin in December 2015.
The American spy in England used often by the Deep State, Stefan Halper, seated Flynn next to Putin and then it is suspected used this information as an informant for the Obama administration to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on General Flynn.
Additional information on the framing of General Flynn was reported from a woman who said she was used as a Russian against the General –
General Flynn’s actions had nothing to do with collusion with Russia. He was set up and spied on!
In October 2016, shortly before the election, based on a bogus and fake dossier financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, Obama’s gang of corrupt Intel Heads filed for and eventually obtained a warrant to spy on fellow Americans. The warrants were fraudulent due to their source and made up content.
Obama spied on the Trump team as well as President Trump’s leadership team, including General Michael Flynn for some time. (When and for how long is still unknown.
Many suspect this is why Flynn was targeted by the Mueller gang – because Flynn was spied on illegally by the Obama Deep State for some time before the 2016 election most likely based on the phony reports that Flynn was working with Russians. By indicting General Flynn the Deep State could say – see he was a Russian sympathizer and therefore their illegal spying was justified.)
General Flynn was participating in Trump rallies throughout the US and he also became an advisor for the campaign. At this same time the Obama administration was in full force beginning their efforts to frame candidate Trump as a compatriot with Russia to steal the election. One way they did this was to set up Flynn with the Russians.
After Trump eventually won the election, the Deep State that represented and supported Obama was in a panic. They feared that if Flynn looked into efforts to spy on the Trump campaign, they would be found guilty of their many illegal actions in spying on the incoming President, the opposition party and many others.
When President-elect Trump met with President Obama for the first time, Obama even recommended that the future President not select Flynn to be on the Trump administration team. It’s suspected that Obama didn’t want Flynn on Trump’s team because Obama feared Flynn would uncover the illegal spying that the Obama team carried out during the 2016 campaign and before.
So the same FBI investigator who led the Hillary Clinton email investigation –
– The same individual who led the Hillary interview and neglected to take notes, put her under oath or record the meeting
– The same individual who assisted in drafting the memo months before the Hillary was interviewed that was presented by corrupt FBI Director Comey to explain why the FBI was not pressing charges against Hillary
– The same individual who lead the Russia – Trump investigation
– The same individual who neglected to do anything when presented with information that China was hacking Hillary’s emails real-time
– The same individual who personally reviewed over 300,000 Hillary emails found on perp Anthony Weiner’s computer a week before the 2016 election
– The same individual that said all of Weiner’s emails were reviewed in less than a week and no criminally related information was found
– This individual, Peter Strzok, went to the White House a couple days after President Trump’s inauguration and entrapped General Flynn, President Trump’s National
Security Advisor, in discussions related to Russia.
Corrupt Strzok asked Flynn questions related to a call Flynn made to a Russian official before the inauguration – totally legal. The rumor is that the FBI Agent with Strzok, Joe Pientka, said Flynn never lied. Strzok and Pientka asked Flynn questions, did not tell him he was under investigation, did not read him his rights, did not allow him to have an attorney and then lied about what was said. The location of the FBI’s original Form 302 recording this discussion is unknown.
After this meeting a few days later, then acting AG Sally Yates, an Obama holdover, went over to the White House and stated that General Flynn had lied to the FBI. Eventually General Flynn resigned from his position at the White House on February 13, 2017.
A few months passed and then the corrupt Mueller investigation started. Mueller’s first target was General Flynn. Mueller had nothing on Flynn so he and his goons went after Flynn’s son, Michael Flynn, Jr. Micheal Jr had a brand new baby and was grilled by the Mueller team. Eventually, they used the General’s family against him. It’s believed that the General could plea guilty to a bogus charge of lying to the FBI or he could watch Mueller’s goons put his son in prison for some bogus crime.
“Make a decision, either your country or your son?”
Mueller’s goons put the General in the worst position possible. He chose his son. The goons then placed the General under a gag order while the media persecuted him for months for a false crime, unrelated to Russia collusion. They paraded him as a criminal.
The judge overseeing the case who took Flynn’s plea was a friend of corrupt cop Strzok and was also a FISA Court judge. He was recused from the sentencing but to this day we don’t know why. They never told Flynn that he was being spied on for months before the election.
The Mueller team and the Deep State and the Democrats didn’t stop with the General, they went after others including the President’s eldest son, Don Jr.
There are so many questions yet unanswered. One question is why did Obama’s Deep State not tell the President that General Flynn was under investigation during his campaign? Who made this decision? This would have been the proper thing to do. Were they afraid that illegitimate spying by the Obama team would be uncovered?
General Flynn is a patriot. He never should have been put in this situation. He was illegally set up and lied to. He was forced to choose between his family or his country. General Flynn chose his family. What would you have done?
Please donate to the Michael T. Flynn Legal Defense Fund. This ordeal has cost him and his family millions.
by Jim Hoft May 18, 2019 259 Comments
General Flynn was given an ultimatum by the corrupt Mueller team – choose either your son or your country! This grotesque abuse of power and the legal system by the Mueller gang should never have happened and should not go unpunished!
General Flynn worked for the Obama Administration but at some point was fired by Obama for apparently disagreeing with his policies and actions and speaking out against his failed policies in Iraq and Syria. Soon after, then candidate Trump ran for office and General Flynn supported the future President and introduced the candidate at rallies and then was offered a position on the Trump team.
Obama was upset with Flynn for supporting Trump and it appears that he had some sort of vendetta with Flynn for his comments on the growing threat of ISIS. It’s also suspected that after Flynn parted ways with President Obama he was set up at a dinner with Russians where he was seated next to Russian President Putin in December 2015.
The American spy in England used often by the Deep State, Stefan Halper, seated Flynn next to Putin and then it is suspected used this information as an informant for the Obama administration to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on General Flynn.
Additional information on the framing of General Flynn was reported from a woman who said she was used as a Russian against the General –
Svetlana Lokhova, the Russian historian at the center of Michael Flynn investigation for ‘alleged contacts with Russians’, told Fox News in an exclusive interview with Catherine Herridge, that she is not a Russian spy and that she thought “there’s a high chance that is was coordinated, and believe it needs to be properly investigated.”
In 2017, American various media outlets framed her as a Russian operative and linked her to Michael Flynn. The allegations involved her contact with Flynn three years prior at a 2014 dinner at the University of Cambridge, England, when Flynn was Defense Intelligence Agency director.
In 2017, American various media outlets framed her as a Russian operative and linked her to Michael Flynn. The allegations involved her contact with Flynn three years prior at a 2014 dinner at the University of Cambridge, England, when Flynn was Defense Intelligence Agency director.
General Flynn’s actions had nothing to do with collusion with Russia. He was set up and spied on!
In October 2016, shortly before the election, based on a bogus and fake dossier financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, Obama’s gang of corrupt Intel Heads filed for and eventually obtained a warrant to spy on fellow Americans. The warrants were fraudulent due to their source and made up content.
Many suspect this is why Flynn was targeted by the Mueller gang – because Flynn was spied on illegally by the Obama Deep State for some time before the 2016 election most likely based on the phony reports that Flynn was working with Russians. By indicting General Flynn the Deep State could say – see he was a Russian sympathizer and therefore their illegal spying was justified.)
General Flynn was participating in Trump rallies throughout the US and he also became an advisor for the campaign. At this same time the Obama administration was in full force beginning their efforts to frame candidate Trump as a compatriot with Russia to steal the election. One way they did this was to set up Flynn with the Russians.
After Trump eventually won the election, the Deep State that represented and supported Obama was in a panic. They feared that if Flynn looked into efforts to spy on the Trump campaign, they would be found guilty of their many illegal actions in spying on the incoming President, the opposition party and many others.
When President-elect Trump met with President Obama for the first time, Obama even recommended that the future President not select Flynn to be on the Trump administration team. It’s suspected that Obama didn’t want Flynn on Trump’s team because Obama feared Flynn would uncover the illegal spying that the Obama team carried out during the 2016 campaign and before.
So the same FBI investigator who led the Hillary Clinton email investigation –
– The same individual who led the Hillary interview and neglected to take notes, put her under oath or record the meeting
– The same individual who assisted in drafting the memo months before the Hillary was interviewed that was presented by corrupt FBI Director Comey to explain why the FBI was not pressing charges against Hillary
– The same individual who lead the Russia – Trump investigation
– The same individual who neglected to do anything when presented with information that China was hacking Hillary’s emails real-time
– The same individual who personally reviewed over 300,000 Hillary emails found on perp Anthony Weiner’s computer a week before the 2016 election
– The same individual that said all of Weiner’s emails were reviewed in less than a week and no criminally related information was found
– This individual, Peter Strzok, went to the White House a couple days after President Trump’s inauguration and entrapped General Flynn, President Trump’s National
Security Advisor, in discussions related to Russia.
Corrupt Strzok asked Flynn questions related to a call Flynn made to a Russian official before the inauguration – totally legal. The rumor is that the FBI Agent with Strzok, Joe Pientka, said Flynn never lied. Strzok and Pientka asked Flynn questions, did not tell him he was under investigation, did not read him his rights, did not allow him to have an attorney and then lied about what was said. The location of the FBI’s original Form 302 recording this discussion is unknown.
After this meeting a few days later, then acting AG Sally Yates, an Obama holdover, went over to the White House and stated that General Flynn had lied to the FBI. Eventually General Flynn resigned from his position at the White House on February 13, 2017.
A few months passed and then the corrupt Mueller investigation started. Mueller’s first target was General Flynn. Mueller had nothing on Flynn so he and his goons went after Flynn’s son, Michael Flynn, Jr. Micheal Jr had a brand new baby and was grilled by the Mueller team. Eventually, they used the General’s family against him. It’s believed that the General could plea guilty to a bogus charge of lying to the FBI or he could watch Mueller’s goons put his son in prison for some bogus crime.
“Make a decision, either your country or your son?”
Mueller’s goons put the General in the worst position possible. He chose his son. The goons then placed the General under a gag order while the media persecuted him for months for a false crime, unrelated to Russia collusion. They paraded him as a criminal.
The judge overseeing the case who took Flynn’s plea was a friend of corrupt cop Strzok and was also a FISA Court judge. He was recused from the sentencing but to this day we don’t know why. They never told Flynn that he was being spied on for months before the election.
The Mueller team and the Deep State and the Democrats didn’t stop with the General, they went after others including the President’s eldest son, Don Jr.
There are so many questions yet unanswered. One question is why did Obama’s Deep State not tell the President that General Flynn was under investigation during his campaign? Who made this decision? This would have been the proper thing to do. Were they afraid that illegitimate spying by the Obama team would be uncovered?
General Flynn is a patriot. He never should have been put in this situation. He was illegally set up and lied to. He was forced to choose between his family or his country. General Flynn chose his family. What would you have done?
Please donate to the Michael T. Flynn Legal Defense Fund. This ordeal has cost him and his family millions.
Federalist Editor Takes Mueller To The Woodshed: Your Whole Operation Was A Political Hit Job
Matt Vespa
|
@mvespa1
|
Posted: May 30, 2019 2:25 PM
Source: AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
Watch out, folks! The Federalist’s Sean Davis is dragging the beaten hypothetical corpse of Robert Mueller through. He just took the man to the woodshed in his latest piece and rightfully so. The Russia investigation is over. Special Counsel Mueller is done. He’s done talking about it. He directed us to read the report that was compiled after two years of digging and to leave him alone. Oh, and Democrats, go ahead with impeachment wink* wink*. He twisted the words of his investigation’s findings on Russian collusion; none was found. But Mueller phrased it in a way that left it open for interpretation. And if we know anything about that, impeachment-obsessed Democrats will take it, run with it, and totally go off the rails—and they have. The Mueller report exonerated the Trump White House of Russian collusion. That’s a fact. Done. This circus is over. I wish it were over, but Mueller had to rehash and pour gasoline over the obstruction allegations, which the DOJ determined didn’t have enough to bring forward formal charges.
Again, it’s over. But the Left, promising their base a fight, are going to impeach Donald Trump. It’s only a matter of time. They need to; it’s a key 2018 campaign promise. House Democrats wouldn’t be running the show in the lower chamber if they hadn’t pushed for of heavily insinuated that this would be an agenda action item.
Mueller decided to fan those flames again, and now we have a brushfire over a presser that really didn’t unveil anything new. If anything, it was what Attorney General William Barr outlined prior to the redacted report being released to the public. It’s that outline that apparently reeks of a cover-up, an allegiance to Trump, and possible perjury. Even after the case has been closed, the nothing burgers keep being served. Only Democrat whose brain function has been depressed by over consuming this myth for the past two years would believe this were a rational take. Everyone else knows it's not. Mueller is now patient zero, spreading impeachment Ebola that has spread like a brush fire among congressional Democrats.
Maybe this was his aim all along. Davis noted that the media glossed over key portions of the Mueller report that showed the political motivations of the investigation. The hard-core group of Democratic lawyers really, really wanted to prove Russian collusion, but couldn’t find anything, which adds more credibility to the report’s conclusions on that front. It also could explain why after this Trump-Russia collusion horse was discovered to be a myth—the investigation limped on and on for 18 months at the cost of millions of dollars. As a result, the liberal pundits, Democrats, and their minions in the media kept hanging onto hope that something would be found. And then the report was done, nothing was found, and an entire industry got a haymaker so brutal, so violent, that the lower part of its jaw was dislodged. They can’t let it go. They won’t let it go. Like penicillin-resistant syphilis, it will linger trying to slowly take down this White House for merely beating an inauthentic, lying, untrustworthy woman whose favorable numbers depreciated the longer she remained in the spotlight. Hillary sucked. Sorry, lefties, your gal just couldn’t win. And if she couldn’t do it in 2016, she was never going to win.
Sean Davis
✔@seanmdav
A few things are clear from the press conference: Mueller (who came across as feeble and doddering, more resembling an aging senator than a tough prosecutor) always wanted to impeach Trump, is mad he lost control of the narrative, and doesn't think he's accountable to Congress.
6,063
11:19 AM - May 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
2,597 people are talking about this
Sean Davis
✔@seanmdav
Replying to @seanmdav
Also, Mueller's view of a prosecutor's role -- to prove and declare a target's innocence, rather than to charge criminality -- is a despicable affront to the rule of law and the Constitution. Cops and lawyers don't grant innocence. It is our default legal state absent conviction.
4,765
11:22 AM - May 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
2,334 people are talking about this
This feeling was amplified with the conclusion of this investigation and no definitive smoking gun that could torpedo this administration. As a result, Davis goes into a very lengthy piece about how the exiting presser by Mueller yesterday proved that this was a political hit job that perverted the rule of law. And he also makes a note that the apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree between Mueller and his successor at the FBI, James Comey, concerning the apparent overreach in the investigations that have defined their legacies:
The spying on the Trump campaign, the deep state—all of this was initially received as psychobabble by the liberal media. They’ve both been confirmed. These are deep state antics. The DOJ is looking into the origins of the Russia investigation, which AG Barr has said the answers he’s received to his questions just “don’t hang together.” Barr is also looking into whether the Trump dossier, which was reportedly used to secure a FISA spy warrant against Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, which was known to be biased political opposition research by the State Department at the time. The man who compiled it, ex-MI6 spy Christopher Steele, all but admitted that this information had a shelf life. In other words, it needed to get out to impact the 2016 race. The effort was funded by the Clinton campaign, the FBI used it to secure a FISA spy warrant, and it seems that they didn’t even bother to verify it. I mean, if you miss these glaring errors, the only other conclusion is gross incompetence. Either way, it’s not good. The spygate fiasco is the one that drops next. The DOJ’s inspector general, an Obama-appointee, is going to drop his final report on that this summer. And I think there are a lot of Democrats who are nervous.
Matt Vespa
|
@mvespa1
|
Posted: May 30, 2019 2:25 PM
Source: AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
Watch out, folks! The Federalist’s Sean Davis is dragging the beaten hypothetical corpse of Robert Mueller through. He just took the man to the woodshed in his latest piece and rightfully so. The Russia investigation is over. Special Counsel Mueller is done. He’s done talking about it. He directed us to read the report that was compiled after two years of digging and to leave him alone. Oh, and Democrats, go ahead with impeachment wink* wink*. He twisted the words of his investigation’s findings on Russian collusion; none was found. But Mueller phrased it in a way that left it open for interpretation. And if we know anything about that, impeachment-obsessed Democrats will take it, run with it, and totally go off the rails—and they have. The Mueller report exonerated the Trump White House of Russian collusion. That’s a fact. Done. This circus is over. I wish it were over, but Mueller had to rehash and pour gasoline over the obstruction allegations, which the DOJ determined didn’t have enough to bring forward formal charges.
Again, it’s over. But the Left, promising their base a fight, are going to impeach Donald Trump. It’s only a matter of time. They need to; it’s a key 2018 campaign promise. House Democrats wouldn’t be running the show in the lower chamber if they hadn’t pushed for of heavily insinuated that this would be an agenda action item.
Mueller decided to fan those flames again, and now we have a brushfire over a presser that really didn’t unveil anything new. If anything, it was what Attorney General William Barr outlined prior to the redacted report being released to the public. It’s that outline that apparently reeks of a cover-up, an allegiance to Trump, and possible perjury. Even after the case has been closed, the nothing burgers keep being served. Only Democrat whose brain function has been depressed by over consuming this myth for the past two years would believe this were a rational take. Everyone else knows it's not. Mueller is now patient zero, spreading impeachment Ebola that has spread like a brush fire among congressional Democrats.
Maybe this was his aim all along. Davis noted that the media glossed over key portions of the Mueller report that showed the political motivations of the investigation. The hard-core group of Democratic lawyers really, really wanted to prove Russian collusion, but couldn’t find anything, which adds more credibility to the report’s conclusions on that front. It also could explain why after this Trump-Russia collusion horse was discovered to be a myth—the investigation limped on and on for 18 months at the cost of millions of dollars. As a result, the liberal pundits, Democrats, and their minions in the media kept hanging onto hope that something would be found. And then the report was done, nothing was found, and an entire industry got a haymaker so brutal, so violent, that the lower part of its jaw was dislodged. They can’t let it go. They won’t let it go. Like penicillin-resistant syphilis, it will linger trying to slowly take down this White House for merely beating an inauthentic, lying, untrustworthy woman whose favorable numbers depreciated the longer she remained in the spotlight. Hillary sucked. Sorry, lefties, your gal just couldn’t win. And if she couldn’t do it in 2016, she was never going to win.
Sean Davis✔@seanmdav
A few things are clear from the press conference: Mueller (who came across as feeble and doddering, more resembling an aging senator than a tough prosecutor) always wanted to impeach Trump, is mad he lost control of the narrative, and doesn't think he's accountable to Congress.
6,063
11:19 AM - May 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
2,597 people are talking about this
Sean Davis✔@seanmdav
Replying to @seanmdav
Also, Mueller's view of a prosecutor's role -- to prove and declare a target's innocence, rather than to charge criminality -- is a despicable affront to the rule of law and the Constitution. Cops and lawyers don't grant innocence. It is our default legal state absent conviction.
4,765
11:22 AM - May 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
2,334 people are talking about this
This feeling was amplified with the conclusion of this investigation and no definitive smoking gun that could torpedo this administration. As a result, Davis goes into a very lengthy piece about how the exiting presser by Mueller yesterday proved that this was a political hit job that perverted the rule of law. And he also makes a note that the apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree between Mueller and his successor at the FBI, James Comey, concerning the apparent overreach in the investigations that have defined their legacies:
If there were any doubts about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s political intentions, his unprecedented press conference on Wednesday should put them all to rest. As he made abundantly clear during his doddering reading of a prepared statement that repeatedly contradicted itself, Mueller had no interest in the equal application of the rule of law. He gave the game, and his nakedly political intentions, away repeatedly throughout his statement.
“It is important that the office’s written work speak for itself,” Mueller said, referring to his office’s 448-page report. Mueller’s report was released to the public by Attorney General William Barr nearly six weeks ago. The entire report, minus limited redactions required by law, has been publicly available, pored through, and dissected. Its contents have been discussed ad nauseum in print and on television. The report has been speaking for itself since April 18, when it was released.
If it’s important for the work to speak for itself, then why did Mueller schedule a press conference in which he would speak for it weeks after it was released? The statement, given the venue in which it was provided, is self-refuting.
Let’s start with the Mueller team’s unique take on the nature of a prosecutor’s job. The standard American view of justice, affirmed and enforced by the U.S. Constitution, is that all are presumed innocent absent conviction by a jury of a specific charge of criminal wrongdoing. That is, the natural legal state of an individual in this country is innocence. It is not a state or a nature bestowed by cops or attorneys. Innocence is not granted by unelected bureaucrats or federal prosecutors.
“Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.”
Had he stopped there, he would have been correct. But then he crafted a brand new standard.
“The order appointing the special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation and kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of our work,” Mueller said. “After that investigation, if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”
According to Mueller and his team, charged Russians are presumed innocent. An American president, however, is presumed guilty unless and until Mueller’s team determines he is innocent.
[…]
“It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge,” Mueller said, after all but stating that Trump committed a crime for which Mueller never charged him. Just as Mueller’s own words and actions at the Wednesday press conference prove that he didn’t want his team’s report to speak for itself, the report itself proves that Mueller and his team don’t believe it’s unfair to accuse somebody of something a court cannot resolve.
If they actually believed that, then the 240-page volume II of their report on their obstruction investigation of the president would never have been authored. After all, according to Mueller’s own statement, such an operation would be patently unfair.
[…]
Mueller revealed himself as little more than a clone of James Comey—the smarmy, scheming politician who replaced Mueller as the head of the FBI. Recall that it was Comey who assumed for himself powers that did not belong to him by law when he declared at a 2016 press conference no “reasonable prosecutor” would charge Hillary Clinton with criminal wrongdoing in her mishandling of classified information and unsanctioned use of a secret, private email server to evade public records laws. Just as Mueller did in his report and Wednesday press conference, Comey followed up his declaration that Hillary would not be charged with statement after statement after statement of all the awful things Hillary Clinton did.
“There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” Comey said of Clinton. He excoriated her for repeatedly sending and receiving top secret information on her unsecured server which had never been authorized to process classified information. He even said it was possible, due to her “extreme” carelessness, that hostile foreign actors had penetrated her system and obtained highly classified information about U.S. national security programs.
[…]
There’s no longer any doubt about who Robert Mueller is or why he conducted himself the way he did. As abominable as his press conference was, we should in many ways be thankful that Mueller so willingly displayed for all to see his disdain for basic rules of prosecutorial conduct, his total lack of self-awareness, and his naked desire to stick it to Trump.
“It is important that the office’s written work speak for itself,” Mueller said, referring to his office’s 448-page report. Mueller’s report was released to the public by Attorney General William Barr nearly six weeks ago. The entire report, minus limited redactions required by law, has been publicly available, pored through, and dissected. Its contents have been discussed ad nauseum in print and on television. The report has been speaking for itself since April 18, when it was released.
If it’s important for the work to speak for itself, then why did Mueller schedule a press conference in which he would speak for it weeks after it was released? The statement, given the venue in which it was provided, is self-refuting.
Let’s start with the Mueller team’s unique take on the nature of a prosecutor’s job. The standard American view of justice, affirmed and enforced by the U.S. Constitution, is that all are presumed innocent absent conviction by a jury of a specific charge of criminal wrongdoing. That is, the natural legal state of an individual in this country is innocence. It is not a state or a nature bestowed by cops or attorneys. Innocence is not granted by unelected bureaucrats or federal prosecutors.
“Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.”
Had he stopped there, he would have been correct. But then he crafted a brand new standard.
“The order appointing the special counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. We conducted that investigation and kept the office of the acting attorney general apprised of our work,” Mueller said. “After that investigation, if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”
According to Mueller and his team, charged Russians are presumed innocent. An American president, however, is presumed guilty unless and until Mueller’s team determines he is innocent.
[…]
“It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge,” Mueller said, after all but stating that Trump committed a crime for which Mueller never charged him. Just as Mueller’s own words and actions at the Wednesday press conference prove that he didn’t want his team’s report to speak for itself, the report itself proves that Mueller and his team don’t believe it’s unfair to accuse somebody of something a court cannot resolve.
If they actually believed that, then the 240-page volume II of their report on their obstruction investigation of the president would never have been authored. After all, according to Mueller’s own statement, such an operation would be patently unfair.
[…]
Mueller revealed himself as little more than a clone of James Comey—the smarmy, scheming politician who replaced Mueller as the head of the FBI. Recall that it was Comey who assumed for himself powers that did not belong to him by law when he declared at a 2016 press conference no “reasonable prosecutor” would charge Hillary Clinton with criminal wrongdoing in her mishandling of classified information and unsanctioned use of a secret, private email server to evade public records laws. Just as Mueller did in his report and Wednesday press conference, Comey followed up his declaration that Hillary would not be charged with statement after statement after statement of all the awful things Hillary Clinton did.
“There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” Comey said of Clinton. He excoriated her for repeatedly sending and receiving top secret information on her unsecured server which had never been authorized to process classified information. He even said it was possible, due to her “extreme” carelessness, that hostile foreign actors had penetrated her system and obtained highly classified information about U.S. national security programs.
[…]
There’s no longer any doubt about who Robert Mueller is or why he conducted himself the way he did. As abominable as his press conference was, we should in many ways be thankful that Mueller so willingly displayed for all to see his disdain for basic rules of prosecutorial conduct, his total lack of self-awareness, and his naked desire to stick it to Trump.
The spying on the Trump campaign, the deep state—all of this was initially received as psychobabble by the liberal media. They’ve both been confirmed. These are deep state antics. The DOJ is looking into the origins of the Russia investigation, which AG Barr has said the answers he’s received to his questions just “don’t hang together.” Barr is also looking into whether the Trump dossier, which was reportedly used to secure a FISA spy warrant against Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, which was known to be biased political opposition research by the State Department at the time. The man who compiled it, ex-MI6 spy Christopher Steele, all but admitted that this information had a shelf life. In other words, it needed to get out to impact the 2016 race. The effort was funded by the Clinton campaign, the FBI used it to secure a FISA spy warrant, and it seems that they didn’t even bother to verify it. I mean, if you miss these glaring errors, the only other conclusion is gross incompetence. Either way, it’s not good. The spygate fiasco is the one that drops next. The DOJ’s inspector general, an Obama-appointee, is going to drop his final report on that this summer. And I think there are a lot of Democrats who are nervous.
Muller's in hiding, he doesn't want to be questioned, he doesn't want the truth to be known, he absolutely positively cannot admit he knew there was no collusion two years ago.
For for fucking idiots, fugetaboutit, you'll never comprehend the reasons why and I'm not wasting time trying to explain it to simple minded partisan hacks
For for fucking idiots, fugetaboutit, you'll never comprehend the reasons why and I'm not wasting time trying to explain it to simple minded partisan hacks
Mueller went so far as to change the transcript of voicemails from Trump's lawyer to make a normal lawyer inquiry sound like an attempt to get information. He conveniently omits the obvious part of a voicemail where Dowd specifically mentions he does NOT WANT ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. How much evidence do you need that Mueller's probe was a political hack job? The dude cannot even quote Trump's lawyer honestly. Obviously it's unethical but is this not blatantly illegal?
Mueller went so far as to change the transcript of voicemails from Trump's lawyer to make a normal lawyer inquiry sound like an attempt to get information. He conveniently omits the obvious part of a voicemail where Dowd specifically mentions he does NOT WANT ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. How much evidence do you need that Mueller's probe was a political hack job? The dude cannot even quote Trump's lawyer honestly. Obviously it's unethical but is this not blatantly illegal?
One of many reasons he'll never testify and why Democrats will not subpoena him. He knows he would get destroyed defending his garbage report.
Why doesn't Sen. Graham just subponea the dirty bastard???
Former Trump Attorney John Dowd: Entire Report by Mueller is a Fraud – We’re Going to Find More False Statements
Attorney John Dowd: I had an obligation as counsel to the president and I’m so glad Judge Sullivan ordered the transcript because we now know the truth. And we also know that this entire report by Mueller is a fraud. And we’re going to find more of these things. Isn’t it ironic that this man who kept indicting and prosecuting people for process crimes committed a false statement in his own report by taking out half my words the changed the tenor and the contents of that conversation with Robert Kelner. And it’s an outrage and there’s probably more of it.
Attorney John Dowd: I had an obligation as counsel to the president and I’m so glad Judge Sullivan ordered the transcript because we now know the truth. And we also know that this entire report by Mueller is a fraud. And we’re going to find more of these things. Isn’t it ironic that this man who kept indicting and prosecuting people for process crimes committed a false statement in his own report by taking out half my words the changed the tenor and the contents of that conversation with Robert Kelner. And it’s an outrage and there’s probably more of it.
Wow, that's almost too good to be true. Mueller changes the intent of a conversation by leaving out and/or misinterpreting key words
Lock him up!!!!!!!
And where have we seen this type of poppycock before? Why right here at theRx, "Trump admits Russia helped him win the election"
I'm telling you people, it's genetics, and they're fucked in the head
[h=1]Former key Mueller witness George Nader arrested on child pornography charges[/h]
Washington (CNN) George Aref Nader, who was a key witness in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, was arrested on child pornography charges Monday in New York, federal prosecutors announced Monday.
Nader was arrested upon arrival at John F. Kennedy International Airport for "transporting visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct."
He previously pleaded guilty to the same charge in 1991, the Justice Department said.
Washington (CNN) George Aref Nader, who was a key witness in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, was arrested on child pornography charges Monday in New York, federal prosecutors announced Monday.
Nader was arrested upon arrival at John F. Kennedy International Airport for "transporting visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct."
He previously pleaded guilty to the same charge in 1991, the Justice Department said.
Uh oh:
[FONT="]Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source
[/FONT][FONT="]...describe Kilimnik as a “sensitive” intelligence source for the U.S. State Department who informed on Ukrainian and Russian matters.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny.[/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]The incomplete portrayal of Kilimnik is so important to Mueller’s overall narrative that it is raised in the opening of his report. “The FBI assesses” Kilimnik “to have ties to Russian intelligence,” Mueller’s team wrote on page 6, putting a sinister light on every contact Kilimnik had with Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman.[/FONT]
[FONT="]What it doesn’t state is that Kilimnik was a “sensitive” intelligence source for State going back to at least 2013 while he was still working for Manafort, according to FBI and State Department memos I reviewed.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source
[/FONT][FONT="]...describe Kilimnik as a “sensitive” intelligence source for the U.S. State Department who informed on Ukrainian and Russian matters.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Why Mueller’s team omitted that part of the Kilimnik narrative from its report and related court filings is not known. But the revelation of it comes as the accuracy of Mueller’s Russia conclusions face increased scrutiny.[/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]The incomplete portrayal of Kilimnik is so important to Mueller’s overall narrative that it is raised in the opening of his report. “The FBI assesses” Kilimnik “to have ties to Russian intelligence,” Mueller’s team wrote on page 6, putting a sinister light on every contact Kilimnik had with Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman.[/FONT]
[FONT="]What it doesn’t state is that Kilimnik was a “sensitive” intelligence source for State going back to at least 2013 while he was still working for Manafort, according to FBI and State Department memos I reviewed.[/FONT]
