Originally Posted by akphidelt
It wasn't stolen and wasn't released illegally. If you guys have Hillary Clinton talking to a news station behind the scenes and they post that, that's fair game all day errrrvry day.
LMAO. A hot mic recording in which all parties have not consented is illegal in California too. Agreeing to an interview is not agreeing to being secretly taped at all times. You two make a good couple though. azzkick(&^
It wasn't stolen and wasn't released illegally. If you guys have Hillary Clinton talking to a news station behind the scenes and they post that, that's fair game all day errrrvry day.
LMAO. A hot mic recording in which all parties have not consented is illegal in California too. Agreeing to an interview is not agreeing to being secretly taped at all times. You two make a good couple though. azzkick(&^
Are you ok that Hillary does?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
Fuck are you guys stupid. If CNN told you morons to stick an acid covered dildo......oh wait a minute.....sorry.
You guys just listen to anything you read on the Internet without ever taking the time to actually know the facts. First off, there was one individual in that company that donated to the Clinton Foundation. That individual was not even part of the company when the 9 different agencies signed off on the Russian uranium deal. That's a far cry from Trump encouraging the Russians to commit espionage on America, lol. Come on now. You guys got to get smarter than this.
I'm not a hypocrite like you guys. I wanted Assange in the electric chair when he released all those Iraq docs from that tranny. Back in the day when Republicans wanted him killed also. Unlike you guys, I don't play party lines. I'm Christian first, American second, Human third, Democrat fourth. I hate anyone that believes they alone can decide what information the world needs to know about America. Hate it!!
And let's not forget about the Russian reset with the Silicon valley of Russia..Skolkovo.
17 of the 28 companies that were awarded contracts which totaled Billions of dollars, were all Clinton Foundation donors.
Yet, “Of the 28 US, European and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors” or sponsored speeches by former President Bill Clinton, Schweizer told The Post.
“It raises the question — do you need to pay money to sit at the table?”
In one example cited by Schweizer, Skolkovo Foundation member and then-Cisco CEO John Chambers donated between $1 million and $5 million in personal and corporate cash to the Clinton Foundation, the report says.
But Skolkovo wound up making America less safe, Schweizer argues, because it shared advanced US technology that Russia can develop for both civilian and military applications, a concern raised already by Army and FBI officials.
Many of Skolkovo’s research projects involved “dual-use” technologies, meaning they would have both civilian and military uses, the report said, citing one in particular — a hybrid airship called an “Atlant” developed at the Skolkovo Aeronautical Center.
“Particularly noteworthy is Atlant’s ability to deliver military cargoes,” including “radar surveillance, air and missile defense and delivery of airborne troops,” the Skolkovo Foundation bragged in a document Schweizer cites.
The reset petered out by the end of 2011, when Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Hillary of fomenting Russian protests over suspicions of fraud in that year’s parliamentary elections.
But by then, the damage had already been done, Schweizer feels.
“I think the idea that you’re going to help develop a Russian version of Silicon Valley, which, by the way, will be controlled by the Russian government, and then not to expect that the technology will be siphoned off for military uses, is incredibly naive,” Schweizer said.
As early as 2010, cybersecurity experts also expressed deep concerns about Russia using Skolkovo to develop hacking capabilities.
Russia’s FSB spy agency — the successor to the KGB — reportedly keeps two of its information warfare “security centers” at Skolkovo, the report says.
“There certainly is an irony that as we are now concerned about Russian cyber-attacks on the US, that the reset played a role in enhancing their cyber-capabilities,” Schweizer said.
In this latest report, as in his book, “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” Schweizer concedes he found no “smoking gun” evidence that any of the donors who poured cash into the Clinton coffers actually were promised, or received, any State Department favors in return.
“We don’t have an email or a pirated voice mail message saying, ‘We’ll give you money if you help us with Skokovo,’” Schweizer told The Post. “But what we do have is a pattern that shows a high percentage of participants in Skolkovo who happen to be Clinton Foundation donors.
“I think that everybody at the Russian reset table seems to walk away with something,” he added.
“The Clintons, they get their donations and speaking fees in the millions of dollars. The Russians get access to advanced US technology. The tech companies [that participated in the reset, including Cisco, Intel, Microsoft] get special access to the Russian market and workforce.
“But the American people get nothing. In fact, we get a rival — Russia — with enhanced technological capabilities. At best, that makes them a tougher competitor [in legitimate commerce],” Schweizer said.
“At worst, they get a more robust military, with technologies that we helped develop, and that can be sold to our enemies.”
The Clinton Foundation is sure to be a sore spot in Hillary’s campaign for the presidency, Schweizer predicted — tainted as it is, despite its laudable philanthropy.
“At the entire Democratic convention, they did not mention the Clinton Foundation once,” he said. “And it’s been the Clintons’ life work for 16-plus years.”
The Clinton campaign did not respond to requests from The Post for comment on the report.
“All I ask is that people look at the money. Who made the deals, who benefited from the deals,” Schweizer said. “We can’t get inside people’s heads as to why they did something, but we should follow the money.”
17 of the 28 companies that were awarded contracts which totaled Billions of dollars, were all Clinton Foundation donors.
Yet, “Of the 28 US, European and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors” or sponsored speeches by former President Bill Clinton, Schweizer told The Post.
“It raises the question — do you need to pay money to sit at the table?”
In one example cited by Schweizer, Skolkovo Foundation member and then-Cisco CEO John Chambers donated between $1 million and $5 million in personal and corporate cash to the Clinton Foundation, the report says.
But Skolkovo wound up making America less safe, Schweizer argues, because it shared advanced US technology that Russia can develop for both civilian and military applications, a concern raised already by Army and FBI officials.
Many of Skolkovo’s research projects involved “dual-use” technologies, meaning they would have both civilian and military uses, the report said, citing one in particular — a hybrid airship called an “Atlant” developed at the Skolkovo Aeronautical Center.
“Particularly noteworthy is Atlant’s ability to deliver military cargoes,” including “radar surveillance, air and missile defense and delivery of airborne troops,” the Skolkovo Foundation bragged in a document Schweizer cites.
‘Of the 28 US, European and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors.’
- Peter Schweizer
Hillary Clinton personally launched the State Department’s efforts toward a Russian reset, presenting her Russian then-counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, with a prop reset button in Geneva in 2009.- Peter Schweizer
The reset petered out by the end of 2011, when Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Hillary of fomenting Russian protests over suspicions of fraud in that year’s parliamentary elections.
But by then, the damage had already been done, Schweizer feels.
“I think the idea that you’re going to help develop a Russian version of Silicon Valley, which, by the way, will be controlled by the Russian government, and then not to expect that the technology will be siphoned off for military uses, is incredibly naive,” Schweizer said.
As early as 2010, cybersecurity experts also expressed deep concerns about Russia using Skolkovo to develop hacking capabilities.
Russia’s FSB spy agency — the successor to the KGB — reportedly keeps two of its information warfare “security centers” at Skolkovo, the report says.
“There certainly is an irony that as we are now concerned about Russian cyber-attacks on the US, that the reset played a role in enhancing their cyber-capabilities,” Schweizer said.
In this latest report, as in his book, “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” Schweizer concedes he found no “smoking gun” evidence that any of the donors who poured cash into the Clinton coffers actually were promised, or received, any State Department favors in return.
“We don’t have an email or a pirated voice mail message saying, ‘We’ll give you money if you help us with Skokovo,’” Schweizer told The Post. “But what we do have is a pattern that shows a high percentage of participants in Skolkovo who happen to be Clinton Foundation donors.
“I think that everybody at the Russian reset table seems to walk away with something,” he added.
“The Clintons, they get their donations and speaking fees in the millions of dollars. The Russians get access to advanced US technology. The tech companies [that participated in the reset, including Cisco, Intel, Microsoft] get special access to the Russian market and workforce.
“But the American people get nothing. In fact, we get a rival — Russia — with enhanced technological capabilities. At best, that makes them a tougher competitor [in legitimate commerce],” Schweizer said.
“At worst, they get a more robust military, with technologies that we helped develop, and that can be sold to our enemies.”
The Clinton Foundation is sure to be a sore spot in Hillary’s campaign for the presidency, Schweizer predicted — tainted as it is, despite its laudable philanthropy.
“At the entire Democratic convention, they did not mention the Clinton Foundation once,” he said. “And it’s been the Clintons’ life work for 16-plus years.”
The Clinton campaign did not respond to requests from The Post for comment on the report.
“All I ask is that people look at the money. Who made the deals, who benefited from the deals,” Schweizer said. “We can’t get inside people’s heads as to why they did something, but we should follow the money.”
You need to research a little more. $130+ million of that came from a UrAsia founder, Frank Giustra, who's a Canadian. Years later the company merged with a Russian company. And the donation was because his relationship with Bill Clinton, and was donated before Hillary ran for President, with absolutely no knowledge of her becoming Secretary of State and being apart of the Russian uranium deal. People are allowed to donate money you know. That's not illegal.
And back to the main point.... there is nothing wrong with legal dealings with foreign countries. Has nothing to do with supporting espionage and a foreign country meddling in our election process. Just because Bill Clinton dealt with a company that had ties to Russia does not mean it's alright for Russians to steal information from our country to pick and choose political candidates. You guys can't be that mentally unstable?
