Thank You Mr. President.......

[SheriffJoe]

Hey mini Pavian, Scott L offered to verify our account balances and ACTUAL WAGERS placed...what do you say Mister Millionaire?

"Duhhhhh....Joe could cheat!! Duhhhhhh...."

Hey mini Pavian, about that meeting in your private box with you and Scott L...

"Oh that...uhhhhhh....yeah, well, uhhhhhh, it takes two to tango"

"I probably pay more in taxes than anyone here" ointer:

Years and years of spewing bullshit - ZERO PROOF!

What an embarrassing broke fraud mini Pavian is.

 

[vitterd]

And I live in a purple flower patch...blah, blah, blah...

Has any of your bullshit ever checked out little Pavian? Of course not Mister "all talk pussy"

"I'll make more on MIA +8 tonight than you will your entire week at your job"

Go ahead and post that losing $20 ticket so we can all laugh our asses off, you miserable envious broke freeloading scumbag. Go ahead, I dare you.

Instead of being a productive member of society, all you do is sit on your fat ass sponging off the government and your poor wife wasting bandwidth 24/7 spewing your boring drivel.

If only the government was shrunk back to it's constitutional size and natural selection was allowed to resume its course...

That purple flower pic was classic. No doubt is was you....the emails matched up. Just like you're not Joe C either right?

my poor wife? Lmao.....nobody has it better

be careful what you say here. With all your bans, this is all you got left!!!

please post more fake tickets. Most bettors say the losing score first " Oakland lose 3-9". Classic

 

[vitterd]

Hey little Pavian, Scott L offered to verify our account balances and ACTUAL WAGERS placed...what do you say Mister Millionaire?

"Duhhhhh....Joe could cheat!! Duhhhhhh...."

Hey mini Pavian, about that meeting with you and Scott L...

"Oh that...uhhhhhh....yeah, well, uhhhhhh, it takes two to tango"

Years and years of spewing bullshit - ZERO PROOF!

What an embarrassing broke fraud little Pavian is.

You wanna meet up? I will be at phillies tomorrow. Your ticket awaits. Just pm me.

As if keeping a large balance in sportsbook accounts is smart. My god.....how dumb can you be.

See you tomorrow!!!

 

[Acebb]

[h=1]U.S. Corporate Profits on Pace for Third Straight Decline[/h]
Based on the 55% of companies in the S&P 500 index that had already reported results Thursday morning, Thomson Reuters expects overall earnings to decline by 6.1% in the first quarter compared with a year earlier. Even excluding energy companies, which are expected to have their worst quarter since oil prices began to plunge in 2014, profits are on pace to fall by 0.5%. Revenues are expected to fall 1.4% overall, or rise 1.7% excluding energy, according to Thomson Reuters.
This would mark the S&P 500’s third consecutive quarter of declining earnings—the longest streak since the financial crisis. Revenues will have declined for five quarters in a row, outstripping even the four-quarter slide in 2008 and 2009.

^ Consumer confidence is at the same level as it was right after the 2001 recession. What a great economy!!!

 

[Dave007inVegas]

little pavian asks…


How mant times can you use little pavian in one post?


Being able to understand “mant” and not wanting to embarrass little pavian, Acebb answers…


As mant times as I want.

 

[scottcarter]

Obama = first president in US history that never achieved, not even once, a 3% growth in GDP during his 8 year presidency.

 

[vitterd]

little pavian asks…


How mant times can you use little pavian in one post?


Being able to understand “mant” and not wanting to embarrass little pavian, Acebb answers…


As mant times as I want.

One pyschopath comes up with the most unoriginal nickname ever.....Joe, zit and Dave follow like zombies. Same as always.....republican sense of humor always horrible. I can tell a republican by just what they find amusing.

 

[vitterd]

Obama = first president in US history that never achieved, not even once, a 3% growth in GDP during his 8 year presidency.

That's been repeated here about10 times today. Anytime negative news is found.....the same people bring it up.....all the positive news we see excuses for.....stock market, jobs added, unemployment cut in half since Bush years.

 

[superbeets]

Obama “worst president since Hoover”

APRIL 29, 2016


After nearly eight years under President Barack Obama, there is one fact that is undeniable — his presidency has been bad for the U.S. economy.
Now that his second term is nearing the end, however, it is becoming clear to economists just how bad Obama has been.
Historically bad.

In terms of GDP growth, Obama is officially projected to be the fourth-worst president in U.S. history — the worst since the Great Depression under President Herbert Hoover.

And Obama will be the only U.S. president that has failed to deliver even a single year of 3%+ GDP growth.
During his presidency, liberals and Democrats pulled out statistic after statistic in a desperate attempt to deflect blame, or hide the facts. But there’s no more denying the numbers.

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of economic health, expanded at a paltry annual rate of 0.5 percent in the January-March quarter, the Commerce Department reported Thursday. That is slower than the fourth quarter’s 1.4 percent growth rate, marks the weakest performance in two years, and officially cements Obama’s shameful economic legacy.

The poor start to the year did not escape notice among critics of Obama.

“Today’s report showing the weakest period of economic growth in two years is the latest sign the Obama economy isn’t working,” said Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus. “Despite all of the evidence Obama’s liberal policies are leaving middle-class families behind and holding back growth, Hillary Clinton thinks this president doesn’t get enough credit and wants to double down on his failed agenda.”

The 0.5 percent GDP advance in the first quarter was the weakest showing since GDP contracted by 0.9 percent in the first three months of 2014.

“Assuming 2.67% RGDP growth for 2016, Obama will leave office having produced an average of 1.55% growth. This would place his presidency fourth from the bottom of the list of [presidencies], above only those of Herbert Hoover (-5.65%), Andrew Johnson (-0.70%) and Theodore Roosevelt (1.41%),” reports Real Clear Markets.

Part of the first-quarter weakness stems from the turbulence in the stock market at the beginning of the year, which was triggered by worries that China was slowing more than expected.

The market has since recovered all of its early-year losses, China’s slowdown now seems less worrisome and oil prices have stabilized and started to rebound. In addition, the U.S. dollar, whose strength had hurt American exporters, has stopped rising and retreated a bit.

Those developments and continued job growth will help bolster the economy in the current quarter and beyond, Behravesh and other analysts said.

But Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Tufts University in Boston, said the rebound could still be derailed if there are not “more positive growth trends overseas.”
Consumer spending, which accounts for 70 percent of economic activity, grew at a 1.9 percent rate in the first quarter. That’s down from 2.4 percent in the fourth quarter and is the weakest showing in a year.

Business investment dropped at a 5.9 percent rate, the biggest quarterly plunge since the depths of the recession in 2009. The decline was led by a record 86 percent plunge in the category that covers oil and gas exploration. U.S. energy companies have cut back sharply in response to falling global oil prices.

The higher deficit subtracted 0.3 percentage point from growth in the first quarter. A further slowdown in business spending to restock their store shelves also hurt growth.
The Federal Reserve on Wednesday took note of economic weak spots and decided for the third straight meeting to keep its key policy rate unchanged in a range of 0.25 percent to 0.5 percent. Many analysts don’t believe there will be a second rate hike until there are more signs of growth.

“The rate of real economic growth is the single greatest determinate of both America’s strength as a nation and the well being of the American people. And, Obama’s record in this area has been truly dismal,” says Real Clear Markets.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.

 

[vitterd]

Superbore keeps spamming it.

Republican Congress fault I thought ? The bush collapse was dem congress right?

 

[JDeuce]

Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, Cass Sunstein, EPA, illegals flooding the country...and more Hussein anchors dragging down the ship.

Unless the next president can not only stop the bleeding but reverse the permanent damage the community organizer inflicted on America, I don't foresee a turnaround anytime soon.

Good friend of mine works in pharmaceutical sales...tells me how much of a fucking disaster the ACA will be to untangle. Even if the next POTUS made it his first official act and had the law repealed five minutes after being inaugurated, it wouldn't get fixed overnight. There has been a lot of damage that has been done, and not all of it would be immediately reversed.

That's just one of the Stuttering Clusterfuck's fuck-up that the next POTUS will have to wrestle with. It literally might require an entire first term to even begin to get things back to normal.

 

[scottcarter]

That's been repeated here about10 times today. Anytime negative news is found.....the same people bring it up.....all the positive news we see excuses for.....stock market, jobs added, unemployment cut in half since Bush years.

worth repeating. Obama lovers believe there is 5% unemployment when the facts don't support it and they count people who have given up looking for work as employed. Nevermind the jobs are less paying ones. WTF? His whole presidency is one big hoax. What a shame.

 

[JDeuce]

worth repeating. Obama lovers believe there is 5% unemployment when the facts don't support it and they count people who have given up looking for work as employed. Nevermind the jobs are less paying ones. WTF? His whole presidency is one big hoax. What a shame.

This is the number you're looking for. The U6 rate:

http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate_u6.jsp

I believe this counts those who stopped receiving unemployment benefits who simply don't count as unemployed anymore, but I'm not 100% sure. It wouldn't surprise me if "real" UE was higher than the 10% it is now.

 

[vitterd]

worth repeating. Obama lovers believe there is 5% unemployment when the facts don't support it and they count people who have given up looking for work as employed. Nevermind the jobs are less paying ones. WTF? His whole presidency is one big hoax. What a shame.

Yeah.....when you don't like the numbers.....blame the numbers. We were losing thousands of jobs per month during last years of bush and we had huge unemployment. We now add jobs and unemployment is in half. Too bad huh?

 

[superbeets]

If you use the broadest definition of unemployment, the ratio of people over the age of 16 with jobs to the overall 16-and-over population, the Labor Department says that 40.6% of the population is unemployed.

 

[festeringZit]

Yep. Obama bar far the worst President ever, what's even sadder is you have libtards that just can't handle that fact, and starting dribbling out

"But but but bBu Bush Bush Bu's fault... "

Fucking donkeys

 

[superbeets]

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is responsible for measuring the nation's unemployment rate by carrying out a monthly survey, known as the Current Population Survey.

Each month, the BLS contacts 60,000 randomly selected households across the country and records the employment status of each person 16 years old or older.


The collected data is then used to extrapolate a variety of national labor force statistics, including six different technical measures of the unemployment rate.



These six unemployment rates are labelled U-1 through U-6, respectively. For the Current Population Survey, an unemployed person is not currently working but is available to work and has actively looked for work at some point during the prior four weeks.



The civilian labor force is the sum of all employed and unemployed people.


A person who has no job and has not looked for a job in the last four weeks is not technically an unemployed person and is not included in the labor force.


.

 

[superbeets]

The collected data is then used to extrapolate a variety of national labor force statistics, including six different technical measures of the unemployment rate.
These six unemployment rates are labelled U-1 through U-6, respectively. For the Current Population Survey, an unemployed person is not currently working but is available to work and has actively looked for work at some point during the prior four weeks. The civilian labor force is the sum of all employed and unemployed people. A person who has no job and has not looked for a job in the last four weeks is not technically an unemployed person and is not included in the labor force.



The Technical Measures of the Unemployment Rate

The first two BLS measures of the unemployment rate, U-1 and U-2, are very narrow. The U-3 unemployment rate is the officially recognized rate of unemployment, measuring the number of unemployed people as a percentage of the labor force. Unless otherwise stated, all generic references to the employment rate in government communications and in the media refer to U-3 unemployment.


.The U-4 unemployment rate is similar to the U-3 rate, but it adds in a category of people who are technically outside the labor force, known as discouraged workers. Discouraged workers desire work and have actively looked for work in the past 12 months, but they have not looked in the last four weeks because they don't believe there is work available for them due to economic conditions or other reasons.The U-5 unemployment rate includes everyone in the U-4 rate, in addition to any people who are available to work, willing to work and not discouraged from looking for work, but who have not looked for work in the prior four weeks for some other reason. The U-6 unemployment rate includes everyone in the U-5 rate plus any people who work part time because full-time work is not available due to economic conditions.





The True Unemployment Rate

The U-3 unemployment rate is a comparatively narrow technical measure that leaves out a whole swath of out-of-work people who are willing and able to take a job but who don't fit the narrow BLS definition of "unemployed." For example, a stonemason who wants to work but who has become discouraged by a lack of opportunity in the midst of a deep economic recession would not be included in U-3 unemployment. A marketing executive who is laid off at age 57 and stops scheduling new job interviews due to her experience of age discrimination would not be included in U-3 unemployment. A person who only works one six-hour shift per week because no full-time jobs are available in his area would not be included in U-3 unemployment.
In contrast to the U-3 rate, the U-6 unemployment rate includes all of these cases. Consequently, the U-6 rate is much truer to a natural, non-technical understanding of what it means to be unemployed. By capturing discouraged workers, underemployed workers and other folks who exist on the margins of the labor market, the U-6 rate provides a broad picture of the underutilization of labor in the country. In this sense, the U-6 rate is the true unemployment rate.


.

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

Trump

"

My foreign policy will always put the interests of the American people, and American security, above all else.

That will be the foundation of every decision that I will make.


America First will be the major and overriding theme of my administration."

We went from mistakes in Iraq to Egypt to Libya, to President Obama’s line in the sand in Syria. Each of these actions have helped to throw the region into chaos, and gave ISIS the space it needs to grow and prosper.

It all began with the dangerous idea that we could make Western democracies out of countries that had no experience or interest in becoming a Western Democracy.

We tore up what institutions they had and then were surprised at what we unleashed. Civil war, religious fanaticism; thousands of American lives, and many trillions of dollars, were lost as a result. The vacuum was created that ISIS would fill. Iran, too, would rush in and fill the void, much to their unjust enrichment.

Our foreign policy is a complete and total disaster.

No vision, no purpose, no direction, no strategy.

"