No, I never met him. Yes, his brother won that poker tourney. Yes, Royal has played with bonuses. No, I do not believe he has been as successful as he claims. I also believe he has other outs and possibly multiple accounts. He speaks out against it, but I think that could be to protect what he is doing
This is a grey area, boys. I personally can see both sides. It does take some rationalizing to justify bigbet and WVU's stance. I'm sure they have had to do that, even though they say there is no ethical dilemma. I mean, bigbet says here that they welcomed him back, but did they really welcome him back 100 times, when only one account is allowed? No. Books have the one account rule for one reason and one reason only.......which is to disallow exactly what the whores did that took advantage of them. It's clearly against the rules, and it takes deception to pull it off. On the other hand, I can see logically walking through it in your head, and calling yourself a "paid advisor" just making money for clients and taking a cut. I would think that most of the bonus whores have to view the money they made as being partly "dirty." But many people see the world much differently that I do, so maybe they don't. I just keep going back to the fact that casinos have a no multiple account rule, and it's only purpose is to prevent exactly what they did.
ok bonus playing money is a little dirty. so is the way a lot of people earn their money. If the casino wins it from a degenerate isn't that money a little dirty? If a tout earns his money on a degenerate doesn't that make it a little dirty? Many of the bashers here work in offshore books, how dirty is the money they make?
It's a question that each person has to answer for themselves. I go to casinos, I worked at a casino, but I could never own a casino. An honest tout, like Elite Sports, I'm fine with them putting in work, giving their clients their best effort, and getting paid for doing it. But we all know that 99% of touts are lying scumbags. Is it dirty for an insurance salesman to sell the policy that he will make the most money off of, and not what is best for the client? Yes, but many of them do exactly that.
The more I think about your last sentence the more this argument is game set match. I won you lost. You flat out admitted by thinking I need to protect myself(which is completely ridiculous by the way) that what you did was wrong. Was looking for this ridiculous argument to come to an end and it just did!!!
