|
Trump To Be Reinstated By August
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-trump-telling-people-will-reinstated-august/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-trump-telling-people-will-reinstated-august/
Keep posting meaningless articles, you brain dead cocksucker. Below it is brought up that DDDDDD needs mental help because he is spouting your "I'll be reinstated by August" crap, and, of course, YOU need help, too. Nice blog, lol (see below). 60 days from now is August 1st, I think it's a good idea to bring up each and every day, from now till then, what a fucking moron you are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y2zf3h9ZeA
[h=1]Trump Is Telling Friends He'll Be President Again By August[/h]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJhpwAEIGlo
[h=1]Trump Absurdly Claims he will be "Reinstated" in August. He won't. Time for Accountability.[/h]
Trump ends blog after 29 days, infuriated by measly readership
June 2, 2021 at 10:42 am Updated June 2, 2021 at 10:59 am
By
Josh Dawsey
and
Drew Harwell
The Washington Post
Former President Donald Trump’s blog, celebrated by advisers as a “beacon of freedom” that would keep him relevant in an online world he once dominated, is dead. It was 29 days old.
Upset by reports from The Washington Post and other outlets highlighting its measly readership and concerns that it could detract from a social media platform he wants to launch later this year, Trump ordered his team on Tuesday to put the blog out of its misery, advisers said.
On its last day, the site was commented on or shared on Facebook and Twitter just 1,500 times — a staggering drop for someone whose every tweet once garnered hundreds of thousands of reactions.
Trump still wants to launch some other platform — timing not yet determined — and didn’t like that this first attempt was mocked, according to a Trump adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly about Trump’s plans.
Trump spokesman Jason Miller said that the “From the Desk of Donald J. Trump” blog “was just auxiliary to the broader efforts we have and are working on.” CNBC first reported the blog’s demise.
Launched last month with a grand unveiling replete with an action-movie-style trailer that proclaimed, “In a time of silence and lies, a beacon of freedom arises,” the blog never secured more than a sliver of the spotlight Trump held before he was banned from every major social media site in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
A Post analysis of online data late last month found that the site was attracting fewer visitors than the pet-adoption service Petfinder and the recipe site Delish. The blog’s prospects hadn’t improved since, even though Trump had taken to writing on it more and more, a new analysis of online data shows.
Three days after The Post report, Trump had released a statement saying his “very basic site” was doing amazingly well, attracting greater attention than during the 2020 election campaign and that it would be doing even better had he not been banned by Facebook and Twitter, actions that denied him direct access to more than 88 million Twitter followers and 35 million Facebook followers.
In his statement, Trump, without citing a source, said that tens of millions of Trump supporters had stopped using Facebook and Twitter “because they’ve becoming ‘boring’ and nasty” — a claim not backed up by the companies’ own data, which shows that U.S. usage has stayed steady or increased since Trump left office.
Trump had said the site allowed everyone to “see my statements, issued in real time, and engage with the MAGA Movement” and that it would allow him to communicate “until I decide on what the future will be for the choice or establishment of a platform. It will happen soon. Stay tuned!” No other Trump platform has been announced.
Many in the former president’s orbit were annoyed with former Trump campaign director Brad Parscale for promoting the blog. But Parscale had defended the website less than two weeks ago, telling The Post it was “built exactly as we pitched it.” “My company spent the last six years building products that helped the president spread his message around the world. And we happily continue to do so,” he said then.
In March, Miller said the new Trump social media platform would be revealed within three months and draw “tens of millions of people” to become “the hottest ticket” in social media. “It’s going to completely redefine the game,” he told Fox News.
But no details have been shared about the new Trump platform. Social media sites are endlessly more expensive and complicated than a simple blog, requiring a vast infrastructure allowing for user accounts, comments and other modern web features that were never present on Trump’s site. Trump dictated his messages to his aides, who would print them out so he could revise them with a Sharpie before manually posting them to the blog.
But the site rarely gained much viewership: Trump’s entire website, including his blog, merchandise store and donation page, saw roughly 4 million visits in the week ending May 18 from desktop and mobile devices in the United States — roughly half of the week’s traffic for the right-wing websites Newsmax and the Gateway Pundit, according to an analysis by the online-analytics firm Similarweb, which tracks and estimates traffic and referrals for millions of websites.
Trump’s supporters also were not racing to share the site on social media. Social engagement across the web with Trump’s blog — a measure of the ‘likes,’ reactions, comments and shares on some of the biggest social media sites, such as Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and Pinterest — peaked at 159,000 interactions on its first day, according to data from the social media analytics firm BuzzSumo.
That response rate was pitifully low by Trump standards. But even though Trump’s blogging rate actually increased in recent days, including 10 new posts last Tuesday, his blog never got anywhere near his first day’s interest level, averaging about 4,000 interactions a day, BuzzSumo data show.
Every blog post has been scrubbed from the internet. The old link now redirects to a webpage urging people to give their contact information to a Trump campaign mailing list.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjEWq-4eGRM
Oh, yeah, I ALWAYS listen intently to what a self described "trickster" who is a convicted felon has to say. It's amazing how stupid you are: Exhibit A, you think that DDDDDD is gonna be POTUS in 59 days, ROTFLMAO!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWbEF_F0q8k
[h=1]Roger Stone Tells Trump To Prepare To Be Indicted[/h]
Trump Paid Hannity $1.5 Million To Make An Ad So Bad It Never Ran
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos. A report by Punchbowl news on Tuesday, says that Sean Hannity helped create an ad for Donald Trump's campaign in the final months of the presidential campaign in 2020. But the ad was so terrible that the only place they were actually willing to run, it was on Hannity's program on Fox news. And the reason they chose to even do that was because as Punchbowl reported, you had all these internal communications trumped, allegedly Trump allegedly loved the ad. Hannity of course, loved the ad and approved it. They said an internal communications. So in order to appease Trump and Hannity and make them think that the ad was running, they actually ran it on Hannity show. So both of them Trump and Hannity would see that the ad is out there and they thought that would be enough to, you know, quiet them down about this $1.5 million ad Here's From Punchbowl. Let me read this multiple internal campaign emails referred to the spot, simply as Hannity, another referred to it as the Hannity written spot, POTUS has not yet approved, But Hannity has read one email hand and He said, this is our best spot. Yet another campaign aid wrote inside the campaign. The spot was mocked mercilessly, mostly because of the dramatic over the top language and a message that seemed to value Quantity over quality. The report notes that Trump loved the ad, but officials in his campaign dislike the fact that it was not only bad, but also the fact that the campaign was bleeding cash at The time. And it was a waste of resources. So Again, they paid $1.5 million for this thing to run during Sean Hannity's program. Um, Sean Hannity has issued a statement, denied any involvement whatsoever in this, in fact, his statement said, uh, the world knows that Sean Hannity supports Donald Trump. But my involvement specifically in the campaign, no, I was not involved that much. Anybody who said that is full of expletive deleted. Um, okay. You weren't involved in the campaign that much. So you were involved with the campaign. Um, talk about burying the lead here, everybody. I, we know that Donald Trump and Sean Hannity were friends. We know they spoke on the telephone frequently, but if Sean Hannity was actively working with or for the Trump campaign, I Think that's something that we need a little more detail about because after all Hannity multi-millionaire, his time is valuable. A guy who, you Know, probably well Tyson's for living his words have value. And if you ever provide something of value To a campaign that's considered an in-kind campaign contribution. And if it exceeds a certain Amount, you can suddenly find yourself on the wrong side of campaign. Finance Laws now of Hannity was compensated for his time. You know, basically acting as an outside advisor, maybe ad writer, if he was actually paid for that. And he reported it in the campaign reported it. Cool. There's actually nothing wrong with that. Except of course, for the ethics of Hannity working for a major news outlet, but also working for a campaign, any other outlet like that? Well, I can't even say any other outlet would fire you. Cause look at Chris Cuomo and Andrew Cuomo. So, you know, There's that which would probably Fall under the same guidelines as Chris Cuomo, helping his brother craft defenses to the allegations against him. Wouldn't that also possibly be violated. I mean, what the hell is going on with the media here in the United States? That's the question we need to be asking and not enough people are, that is why people are turning away from This crap. Maybe not As much as they should, but really you should. The cable news is trash. I don't care who you're watching. I don't care what you're watching. I don't care where you're watching It. Cable news is trash. And this story is just another example as to why it is trash.
Donald Trump's campaign was so desperate during the final stretch before the election that they actually paid Sean Hannity's group $1.5 million to create an ad for them. But the ad was so terrible that it never ran anywhere, except on Hannity's own program. Hannity denies that he had anything to do with the terrible ad, but receipts don't lie. Farron Cousins discusses this.
Oh, yeah, I ALWAYS listen intently to what a self described "trickster" who is a convicted felon has to say. It's amazing how stupid you are: Exhibit A, you think that DDDDDD is gonna be POTUS in 59 days, ROTFLMAO!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWbEF_F0q8k
[h=1]Roger Stone Tells Trump To Prepare To Be Indicted[/h]
Trump Paid Hannity $1.5 Million To Make An Ad So Bad It Never Ran
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos. A report by Punchbowl news on Tuesday, says that Sean Hannity helped create an ad for Donald Trump's campaign in the final months of the presidential campaign in 2020. But the ad was so terrible that the only place they were actually willing to run, it was on Hannity's program on Fox news. And the reason they chose to even do that was because as Punchbowl reported, you had all these internal communications trumped, allegedly Trump allegedly loved the ad. Hannity of course, loved the ad and approved it. They said an internal communications. So in order to appease Trump and Hannity and make them think that the ad was running, they actually ran it on Hannity show. So both of them Trump and Hannity would see that the ad is out there and they thought that would be enough to, you know, quiet them down about this $1.5 million ad Here's From Punchbowl. Let me read this multiple internal campaign emails referred to the spot, simply as Hannity, another referred to it as the Hannity written spot, POTUS has not yet approved, But Hannity has read one email hand and He said, this is our best spot. Yet another campaign aid wrote inside the campaign. The spot was mocked mercilessly, mostly because of the dramatic over the top language and a message that seemed to value Quantity over quality. The report notes that Trump loved the ad, but officials in his campaign dislike the fact that it was not only bad, but also the fact that the campaign was bleeding cash at The time. And it was a waste of resources. So Again, they paid $1.5 million for this thing to run during Sean Hannity's program. Um, Sean Hannity has issued a statement, denied any involvement whatsoever in this, in fact, his statement said, uh, the world knows that Sean Hannity supports Donald Trump. But my involvement specifically in the campaign, no, I was not involved that much. Anybody who said that is full of expletive deleted. Um, okay. You weren't involved in the campaign that much. So you were involved with the campaign. Um, talk about burying the lead here, everybody. I, we know that Donald Trump and Sean Hannity were friends. We know they spoke on the telephone frequently, but if Sean Hannity was actively working with or for the Trump campaign, I Think that's something that we need a little more detail about because after all Hannity multi-millionaire, his time is valuable. A guy who, you Know, probably well Tyson's for living his words have value. And if you ever provide something of value To a campaign that's considered an in-kind campaign contribution. And if it exceeds a certain Amount, you can suddenly find yourself on the wrong side of campaign. Finance Laws now of Hannity was compensated for his time. You know, basically acting as an outside advisor, maybe ad writer, if he was actually paid for that. And he reported it in the campaign reported it. Cool. There's actually nothing wrong with that. Except of course, for the ethics of Hannity working for a major news outlet, but also working for a campaign, any other outlet like that? Well, I can't even say any other outlet would fire you. Cause look at Chris Cuomo and Andrew Cuomo. So, you know, There's that which would probably Fall under the same guidelines as Chris Cuomo, helping his brother craft defenses to the allegations against him. Wouldn't that also possibly be violated. I mean, what the hell is going on with the media here in the United States? That's the question we need to be asking and not enough people are, that is why people are turning away from This crap. Maybe not As much as they should, but really you should. The cable news is trash. I don't care who you're watching. I don't care what you're watching. I don't care where you're watching It. Cable news is trash. And this story is just another example as to why it is trash.
Donald Trump's campaign was so desperate during the final stretch before the election that they actually paid Sean Hannity's group $1.5 million to create an ad for them. But the ad was so terrible that it never ran anywhere, except on Hannity's own program. Hannity denies that he had anything to do with the terrible ad, but receipts don't lie. Farron Cousins discusses this.
Suck Dick, you lying turd. The guy predicted convictions or plea deals for Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Manfort, Ray Gates, among others, and he was right every single time. Go fuck yourself, you brain racist turd. Go "on the record" with your fellow always wrong whack job, Road Scum 57: you predicting "Reinstatement" for tRump by August, scumbag?
Oh, btw, you're big on "crowd size" and how many people follow somebody online; what happened to DDDDDD's blog, bitch?:nohead:Slapping-silly90)):missingteLoser!@#0azzkick(&^popcorn-eatinggifShush()*
Trump ends blog after 29 days, infuriated by measly readership
June 2, 2021 at 10:42 am Updated June 2, 2021 at 10:59 am
By
Josh Dawsey
and
Drew Harwell
The Washington Post
Former President Donald Trump’s blog, celebrated by advisers as a “beacon of freedom” that would keep him relevant in an online world he once dominated, is dead. It was 29 days old.
Upset by reports from The Washington Post and other outlets highlighting its measly readership and concerns that it could detract from a social media platform he wants to launch later this year, Trump ordered his team on Tuesday to put the blog out of its misery, advisers said.
On its last day, the site was commented on or shared on Facebook and Twitter just 1,500 times — a staggering drop for someone whose every tweet once garnered hundreds of thousands of reactions.
Trump still wants to launch some other platform — timing not yet determined — and didn’t like that this first attempt was mocked, according to a Trump adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly about Trump’s plans.
Trump spokesman Jason Miller said that the “From the Desk of Donald J. Trump” blog “was just auxiliary to the broader efforts we have and are working on.” CNBC first reported the blog’s demise.
Launched last month with a grand unveiling replete with an action-movie-style trailer that proclaimed, “In a time of silence and lies, a beacon of freedom arises,” the blog never secured more than a sliver of the spotlight Trump held before he was banned from every major social media site in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
A Post analysis of online data late last month found that the site was attracting fewer visitors than the pet-adoption service Petfinder and the recipe site Delish. The blog’s prospects hadn’t improved since, even though Trump had taken to writing on it more and more, a new analysis of online data shows.
Three days after The Post report, Trump had released a statement saying his “very basic site” was doing amazingly well, attracting greater attention than during the 2020 election campaign and that it would be doing even better had he not been banned by Facebook and Twitter, actions that denied him direct access to more than 88 million Twitter followers and 35 million Facebook followers.
In his statement, Trump, without citing a source, said that tens of millions of Trump supporters had stopped using Facebook and Twitter “because they’ve becoming ‘boring’ and nasty” — a claim not backed up by the companies’ own data, which shows that U.S. usage has stayed steady or increased since Trump left office.
Trump had said the site allowed everyone to “see my statements, issued in real time, and engage with the MAGA Movement” and that it would allow him to communicate “until I decide on what the future will be for the choice or establishment of a platform. It will happen soon. Stay tuned!” No other Trump platform has been announced.
Many in the former president’s orbit were annoyed with former Trump campaign director Brad Parscale for promoting the blog. But Parscale had defended the website less than two weeks ago, telling The Post it was “built exactly as we pitched it.” “My company spent the last six years building products that helped the president spread his message around the world. And we happily continue to do so,” he said then.
In March, Miller said the new Trump social media platform would be revealed within three months and draw “tens of millions of people” to become “the hottest ticket” in social media. “It’s going to completely redefine the game,” he told Fox News.
But no details have been shared about the new Trump platform. Social media sites are endlessly more expensive and complicated than a simple blog, requiring a vast infrastructure allowing for user accounts, comments and other modern web features that were never present on Trump’s site. Trump dictated his messages to his aides, who would print them out so he could revise them with a Sharpie before manually posting them to the blog.
But the site rarely gained much viewership: Trump’s entire website, including his blog, merchandise store and donation page, saw roughly 4 million visits in the week ending May 18 from desktop and mobile devices in the United States — roughly half of the week’s traffic for the right-wing websites Newsmax and the Gateway Pundit, according to an analysis by the online-analytics firm Similarweb, which tracks and estimates traffic and referrals for millions of websites.
Trump’s supporters also were not racing to share the site on social media. Social engagement across the web with Trump’s blog — a measure of the ‘likes,’ reactions, comments and shares on some of the biggest social media sites, such as Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and Pinterest — peaked at 159,000 interactions on its first day, according to data from the social media analytics firm BuzzSumo.
That response rate was pitifully low by Trump standards. But even though Trump’s blogging rate actually increased in recent days, including 10 new posts last Tuesday, his blog never got anywhere near his first day’s interest level, averaging about 4,000 interactions a day, BuzzSumo data show.
Every blog post has been scrubbed from the internet. The old link now redirects to a webpage urging people to give their contact information to a Trump campaign mailing list.
