Seattle had a good D. Look what Atlanta did to them. Also Seattle won in NE.
Early Pinnacle lean is to Atlanta +3 -113 vs NE -3 + 102.
I'm looking forward to all the Super Bowl Props. Bell under today was too easy!
Seattle had Earl Thomas -- they weren't the same without him. And the Pat's played SEA close. They fell 1-yard short of tying it up. In a 16-game season you are not likely to win every game. That the Pat's lost a close game to SEA doesn't say much about the way they matchup with ATL.
But both teams have great offenses. Only 1 team has a good D. ANd it isn't a great D. But even accounting for their weak schedule, they have showed up. They are #1 in scoring D. So they shut down bad offenses. Bad defenses don't consistently hold teams to so few points. Even SEA gave up 30 to the Rams. NE never had a stinker except for the SEA game. They faced weak teams but
they crushed those teams. Not sure why that is a mark against them. If they ranked 10th in scoring D you could say "hey, if they had a tough schedule they would be in the bottom half of the league."
But when you give up less points than anyone, it shows you handled weak offenses as you should. Add to this the situational football, the 14-2 record and the playoff experience....
Anyway, ATL has a chance. I just don't' accept the narrative that NE's defense sucks because they didn't face good teams. They just crushed Pittsburgh, who has a SB-winning QB and the best WR in the AFC.
Shitty defenses don't lead the league in scoring defense, regardless of schedule. And honestly, the league so weak that few teams didn't play a ton of bad QBs.