Sunday's Divisional Round Winners

[RussellPeters]

I am not trying to mislead......I'm just stating it's hard for me to watch this game cheering both sides.

What is your beef?

I don't go into your thread and try to stir shit up.

Be classy!!

it was a legitimate question, if you post a hedge play based on an unposted play why not disclose that? You disclosed this after SF was winning. If I followed your plays and played Carolina then hear you say after the fact that you also have SF in a teaser I would be upset and pissed. It shows your car play was very weak as it was based on a hedge. It's a very valid point.

 

[Scott602]

Very good point Russell. Well said.

 

[919]

it was a legitimate question, if you post a hedge play based on an unposted play why not disclose that? You disclosed this after SF was winning. If I followed your plays and played Carolina then hear you say after the fact that you also have SF in a teaser I would be upset and pissed. It shows your car play was very weak as it was based on a hedge. It's a very valid point.

Of course it is. But most people aren't really here for honest discussion.

 

[snowman]

Piranha check your PM you have a message

 

[Bennyshoe]

it was a legitimate question, if you post a hedge play based on an unposted play why not disclose that? You disclosed this after SF was winning. If I followed your plays and played Carolina then hear you say after the fact that you also have SF in a teaser I would be upset and pissed. It shows your car play was very weak as it was based on a hedge. It's a very valid point.

Ive followed his threads for years and noticed the same.

 

[Piranha]

it was a legitimate question, if you post a hedge play based on an unposted play why not disclose that? You disclosed this after SF was winning. If I followed your plays and played Carolina then hear you say after the fact that you also have SF in a teaser I would be upset and pissed. It shows your car play was very weak as it was based on a hedge. It's a very valid point.

If my CAR play was strong I usually post it as "HUGE" play.

If I'm getting 13 points I like SF more understanding the team's dynamic.

I not trying to confuse bettors.........this has always been my style of betting...........max on my opportunities.

 

[RussellPeters]

If my CAR play was strong I usually post it as "HUGE" play.

If I'm getting 13 points I like SF more understanding the team's dynamic.

I not trying to confuse bettors.........this has always been my style of betting...........max on my opportunities.

you are missing my point? Why not say you are also playing SF +13 in teaser when you posted your Car play? Then let your trailers decide for themselves. Mentioning SF+13 half way through the game is a cop out.

 

[Piranha]

you are missing my point? Why not say you are also playing SF +13 in teaser when you posted your Car play? Then let your trailers decide for themselves. Mentioning SF+13 half way through the game is a cop out.

That's because I still felt CAR was the right play. I felt they could win but not win big.........

 

[bukis1]

So did you win the teaser? How unlucky can we be with Denver that just was icing onthe cake for me

 

[Piranha]

So did you win the teaser? How unlucky can we be with Denver that just was icing onthe cake for me

Ticket #: 7187815 Jan 11 04:36 PM Jan 11 08:17 PM Jan 12 01:07 PM Jan 12 04:42 PM

NFL NFL NFL NFL

4 Team Special Teaser [111] NO SAINTS +21-110 (B+13) [114] NE PATRIOTS +6-110 (B+13) [115] SF 49ERS +13-110 (B+13) [118] DEN BRONCOS +3½-110 (B+13)

WIN WIN WIN WIN WIN

01/09/2014 07:21 PM

We were unlucky with the on-side kick. Had Denver got it, I believe they would have covered.

Win some lose some.......onto next weekend.