I dont get why someone wouldbet more than they can afford when your garenteed to be up a unit!!!!
Vegas elite had a perfect 4-0 weekend.
The picks are always free and they hit 65%-70% religously
I have been playing their picks for 9 months and i wrote some
background on a thread so as not to clutter this one but they are
worth looking at each day for sure
No offense, if you hit 65%-70%, you would be a billionaire. Google Fezzik 60%. !<<)
This is correct. Here is a breakdown if you loose three in a row:
Session 1 - 1 Unit = 110/100
Session 1 - 1 Unit = 120/110
Session 1 - 2 Unit = 253/230
Session 1 - 3 Units = 388.30/353
Now if you started at the beginning you would be up $3,200.00. The question is, how long does Dean go before he calls the session a system loss.:smoker2: Also, I just started betting him Thursday.:sadbb:
BookieBasherSports... (5-6-1) -207 Dimes
DePaul +21.5 Wager to win 100dimes
Depaul + 21.5 and Valparaiso -1.5 Wager 100 dimes to win 260(parlay)
Depaul + 21.5 and Illinois - Chicago +1.5 Wager 100 dimes to win 260 (parlay)
stop being ignorant, he is 58-28 in football the last 2 years, i can confirm this as i have tracked every game. this comes out to 67.44%. He has also started the basketball season 6-3 which is 66.67%. He TORE up the nba last year for over 300 dimes profit, especially in the playoffs, and also had a good ncaa tourney last year. if you want to think otherwise thats your choice, ill be making money tailing him regardless of what you think or do.
I have to side with Cubby on this... I haven't tracked Budin, but he provides full transparency on his site... He one of the very few I will tail even during a bad stretch b/c in the long run, he will come out ahead... BTW Cubby, I took Duke also, but am having an awful weekend since yesterday with Portland, Ark St, and ND earlier today...
From RAAJR
This is correct. Here is a breakdown if you loose three in a row:
Session 1 - 1 Unit = 110/100
Session 1 - 1 Unit = 120/110
Session 1 - 2 Unit = 253/230
Session 1 - 3 Units = 388.30/353
I am just trying to understand this because it's not making sense to me.
If you win the first bet you are 1-0 +1 unit
If you lose the first bet you are 0-1 -1.1 unit and based on what is written above on the second bet you bet 1.2 to win 1.1
So if you win the second bet you are 1-1 + 0 units and then what?
If you lose the second bet you're down 2.3 units and expected to bet $253 to win $230 and if you win this you are 1-2 + 0 units. Then what?
The only way you win a UNIT is by winning the first bet, everything after that you are betting to break even.
How are you ever winning a unit unless you win the first bet?
This makes no sense at all and you can't ever be undefeated unless you never lose the first bet.
Am I missing something here or is this example given wrong by RAAJR