Standings, Seedings & Matchups For BetJam's NCAAB H2H "Round of 59" thru 12/14

[ScreaminPain]

My thoughts no byes everything will work out just fine. All people need to worry about is picking winners if you do that you won't have to worry

Actually, that's the answer....

It's a little unusual to change rules at this point. I purpously didn't pick on Sat. before last, (electing to take a -110 x3 games) as it wouldn't affect me in the initial stages. Now however, if I had known the overall scoring leaders would, or could, recieve bye's I probably would have played a couple of games.....just sayin'

WTF, I have to admit I'm laughing at my own ramblings (whining). Joh, for Christs' sake do whatever you want. It's a thankless job trying to keep up with this anyway...you do a great job updating, etc.

Mery Xmas.....

 

[greatfulted]

Actually, that's the answer....

It's a little unusual to change rules at this point. I purpously didn't pick on Sat. before last, (electing to take a -110 x3 games) as it wouldn't affect me in the initial stages. Now however, if I had known the overall scoring leaders would, or could, recieve bye's I probably would have played a couple of games.....just sayin'

WTF, I have to admit I'm laughing at my own ramblings (whining). Joh, for Christs' sake do whatever you want. It's a thankless job trying to keep up with this anyway...you do a great job updating, etc.

Mery Xmas.....

Exactly

 

[JOH]

I count

7 FOR
and
3 AGAINST

byes


Chime in until 7 ET

 

[burrissa]

I favor byes.:toast:

 

[efhutton]

No byes, it will skew overall records for seeding. Changing rules mid contest is not a good thing.

 

[quinnsft34]

No byes, it will skew overall records for seeding. Changing rules mid contest is not a good thing.

He said the people that had byes would still have to make the required plays for the week for that reason.

I don't care either way. If I were to receive a bye I would gladly take it if not I will make my picks and try to beat the other two I play against.

JOH you are the man. Whatever you decide and the board decides is cool with me.

 

[chick'sfridge]

I would be against changing the original rules. The discussions all have merit. Although this is a somewhat low key contest, can you imagine the sportsbook of your choice changing rules for your existing bets? It's never going to be perfect. There have already been philosophical differences. JOH puts in a great deal of time making this go. Keep as advertised! IMO

 

[JOH]

8 to 5 FOR

 

[JOH]

8 to 5 FOR

Well I asked for feedback and that majority would rule. The people have spoken. Done deal. Revised matchups to come.

 

[JOH]

Rules   Roster
[size=+1]2008-09 NCAAB Head2Head Challenge[/size]
[size=+1]Round of 59[/size]
[size=+1]Minimum 10 Plays by Dec 21[/size]
Low man from each matchup is eliminated.​

[indent][indent][/indent][/indent][font=Franklin Gothic Book][b][size=2][color=blue][u]Seed[/u]	[u]Poster[/u]        	[u]W[/u]	[u]L[/u]	[u]P[/u]	[u]Week[/u][/color][/size]	[size=2][color=blue][u]Low[/u][/color][/size]	[size=2][color=blue][u]Surfeit[/u][/color][/size]	[size=2][color=blue][u]Mon15[/u][/color][/size]
								
1	chriscol    	0	0	0	0	bye	-	0
2	bailey         	0	0	0	0	bye	-	0
3	quinnsft34   	0	0	0	0	bye	-	0
4	baccy          	0	0	0	0	bye	-	0
5	billhill999 	0	0	0	0	bye	-	0
								
6	jpr24628    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
59	Drunkn247   	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
7	barsford    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
58	BUCSnotYUCKS 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
8	Deke101     	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
57	goodcall    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
9	msmith2179  	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
56	homedawg    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
10	Plax's 40cal.	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
55	rjt721      	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
11	kreitmaster 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
54	edigs14     	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
12	The Poet    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
53	trytrytry    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
13	Gatorzace   	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
52	ef hutton   	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
14	prime21     	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
51	Harris1285  	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
15	Miklos      	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
50	eaglezzz    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
16	ScreaminPain 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
49	roxy music  	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
17	Gumbi       	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
48	clearx1     	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
18	ECC            	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
47	Brock          	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
19	Maniax      	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
46	JOH™           	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
20	sd5          	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
45	chick's fridge 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
21	HesAHighFlyer	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
44	ChiTown Hustler 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
22	waymac      	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
43	Dunny         	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
23	Greenbacks  	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
42	College Fan 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
24	barman         	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
41	OAKAS          	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
25	Marante     	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
40	TheGuarantee 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
26	Teddy kgb   	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
39	Donnybasbl  	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
27	2ese        	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
38	Wrigley     	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
28	wannabe whale 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
37	yanni_gogolak 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
29	burrissa    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
36	cmoney17    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
30	greatful ted 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
35	winddust    	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
31	Mr.Cover123 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
34	bigtendominator 	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
								
32	itslimatime14	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
33	GE4511         	0	0	0	0	<--	-	0
[/font][/b]

 

[JOH]

Good luck guys

 

[barman]

Urk...I saw this late...would have voted No Changes...but okey dokey

How about we collectively agree that there will be no more changes? Since none of us have posted up $$ to be at risk, there's less intensity to make it all perfect.

 

[TheGuarantee]

I don't really see this as a change to be honest...

 

[Drunkn247]

if its me vs another guy and I picked a game earlier then him and then he picks the same side as me does it count...I thought once it broke down to 1vs1 it was first guy to pick gets the play.

 

[quinnsft34]

Only matters starting with the round of 32 Drunkn247