<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BZ:
For the record I think its bullsh*t that the RR can use any book. Talk about overreaction. Hammy mentioned something about not feeling good if you win by unfair advantage- take the mirror test.
Det/SD OVER 7.5 -20 skybook 2:05pm pst<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
BZ-
I am willing to reopen the discussion re the fairness of this solution. I thought that you were ok with this compromise when you stated the other day:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> BZ
Lucky
posted June 03, 2003 05:06 PM
Hammy,
I hear what you are saying and believe me if I thought there was any unfair advantage I would quit the contest immediately.
Honestly, I wouldn't care what book was used
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>LINK
I won't hold you to your previous opinion though. Which line(s) do you think were unfair? I only used two lines from non ad books, one a money line favorite winner and the other an even money winner.
For the record I think its bullsh*t that the RR can use any book. Talk about overreaction. Hammy mentioned something about not feeling good if you win by unfair advantage- take the mirror test.
Det/SD OVER 7.5 -20 skybook 2:05pm pst<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
BZ-
I am willing to reopen the discussion re the fairness of this solution. I thought that you were ok with this compromise when you stated the other day:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> BZ
Lucky
posted June 03, 2003 05:06 PM
Hammy,
I hear what you are saying and believe me if I thought there was any unfair advantage I would quit the contest immediately.
Honestly, I wouldn't care what book was used
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>LINK
I won't hold you to your previous opinion though. Which line(s) do you think were unfair? I only used two lines from non ad books, one a money line favorite winner and the other an even money winner.
Your quote Ham
"It is impractical to determine post facto whether or not the non ad book lines were also available at ad books. The only solution I can think of is to simply provide us the same "advantage" to us for 6 days, despite the fact that they had this advantage for 9 days."
I disagree. You know well that there was no advatge and that the line Kodiak posted were the same ad an advertized book.
I don't and didn't agree with your solution.
You posting of some obscure book is not the same as Kodiak using Oasis.
"It is impractical to determine post facto whether or not the non ad book lines were also available at ad books. The only solution I can think of is to simply provide us the same "advantage" to us for 6 days, despite the fact that they had this advantage for 9 days."
I disagree. You know well that there was no advatge and that the line Kodiak posted were the same ad an advertized book.
I don't and didn't agree with your solution.
You posting of some obscure book is not the same as Kodiak using Oasis.
