OK lets get one thing straight here and that is simply if I elect to ask SP Connection a question which could enhance my winnings for the upcoming week in the CFL, then I'll ask it. By the same token I don't need any petty responses from jerks like 'Insight', 'Monkey'(--even though the name probably suits your looks) and finally you 'Stick' because you're are a simple 'dick'! :missingte :missingte
You know I actually get tired of you flunkies interrupting my question to the person I'm directing it at and quite frankly I couldn't care less what his fucking record or style was a couple of years ago, last year or last week for that matter. SP Connection indicated prior to week one that he would have a 'HUGE' play upcoming in week three of the CFL. Now if you assholes, who claim to be such bigtime followers of SP as you claim to be, you'll recall what I'm talking about. However based on your idiotic and pathetic replies to my question, it appears you haven't a fucking clue what he said at that time. I don't make it a habit of wagering on all four CFL games each week and with that said I was very interested to see what SP's so-called 'HUGE' play was for week three as he announced. By the same token, his words or description of the upcoming game involving Saskatchewan wasn't as big and positive as they were when he made his remarks and/or announcement prior to his selections in week one. That is why I wanted to know if Saskatchewan was indeed his so-called 'HUGE' play for week three or not. There is a hell of a difference IMO between a 'Big' play and a 'HUGE' play when I lay or place a wager. It may indicate the difference between plunking down $500 or a dime in conclusion. As usual, SP Connection rarely responds to questions but I thought for certain he would have clarified whether or not he was following up with his words and announcement from week one with a strasight answer to my strsight forward question. Instead I get a bunch of nickel and penny elementary CFL bettors causing their usual bullshit! SP if you happen to read this post, simply clarify the announcement you made prior to making your week one picks. Is Saskatchewan regarded as a simply 'Big' play this week or are they the so-called 'HUGE' play you announced you would have for week three in the CFL? Once again, there is a hell of a difference in my betting vocabulary between the two! (Lastly, hopefully a simple reply or response might zipper up the lips of these other .02 cent bettors once and for all.)
P.S. By the way, in case you so-called staunch SP Connection followers forgot his post prior to his CFL week one selections, here it is to refresh your memories:
"Really what does anyone know yet - so many teams with new faces so i'm going to go lightly the first couple of weeks then hammer a game week three - it will be the strongest selection i have seen in years maybe ever?
week one small plays on saskatchewan and winnipeg
thanks boys"
Now, to me that sounded like a selection I think anyone would be anticipating, particulary based on SP Connection's CFL capping ability. Hopefully now you can understand why I was simply asking if Saskatchewan was this so-called "strongest selection he (SP) has seen in years maybe ever"! Afterall, he only did list it as 'Big' this time.
<!-- / message -->
You know I actually get tired of you flunkies interrupting my question to the person I'm directing it at and quite frankly I couldn't care less what his fucking record or style was a couple of years ago, last year or last week for that matter. SP Connection indicated prior to week one that he would have a 'HUGE' play upcoming in week three of the CFL. Now if you assholes, who claim to be such bigtime followers of SP as you claim to be, you'll recall what I'm talking about. However based on your idiotic and pathetic replies to my question, it appears you haven't a fucking clue what he said at that time. I don't make it a habit of wagering on all four CFL games each week and with that said I was very interested to see what SP's so-called 'HUGE' play was for week three as he announced. By the same token, his words or description of the upcoming game involving Saskatchewan wasn't as big and positive as they were when he made his remarks and/or announcement prior to his selections in week one. That is why I wanted to know if Saskatchewan was indeed his so-called 'HUGE' play for week three or not. There is a hell of a difference IMO between a 'Big' play and a 'HUGE' play when I lay or place a wager. It may indicate the difference between plunking down $500 or a dime in conclusion. As usual, SP Connection rarely responds to questions but I thought for certain he would have clarified whether or not he was following up with his words and announcement from week one with a strasight answer to my strsight forward question. Instead I get a bunch of nickel and penny elementary CFL bettors causing their usual bullshit! SP if you happen to read this post, simply clarify the announcement you made prior to making your week one picks. Is Saskatchewan regarded as a simply 'Big' play this week or are they the so-called 'HUGE' play you announced you would have for week three in the CFL? Once again, there is a hell of a difference in my betting vocabulary between the two! (Lastly, hopefully a simple reply or response might zipper up the lips of these other .02 cent bettors once and for all.)
P.S. By the way, in case you so-called staunch SP Connection followers forgot his post prior to his CFL week one selections, here it is to refresh your memories:
"Really what does anyone know yet - so many teams with new faces so i'm going to go lightly the first couple of weeks then hammer a game week three - it will be the strongest selection i have seen in years maybe ever?
week one small plays on saskatchewan and winnipeg
thanks boys"
Now, to me that sounded like a selection I think anyone would be anticipating, particulary based on SP Connection's CFL capping ability. Hopefully now you can understand why I was simply asking if Saskatchewan was this so-called "strongest selection he (SP) has seen in years maybe ever"! Afterall, he only did list it as 'Big' this time.
<!-- / message -->
uke1:
