I understand the format, but it doesnt make any sense, IMO.
The average person cruising the forum will see player x at the top, look at his plays, and go along with their big ones. What is so misleading is the fact that if someone is +200 units on the top column (had they FLAT bet) but -100 units on the bottom (BIG plays/reality) then they are really buying into a negative expectation. There will continue to be people who chase, as sure as the sun will rise. If units as a percentage of BR was mandatory, then no one could chase for long since it's impossible to go below -100% of BR (or 100 units at 1% each).
It's really not difficult to fix, and it's actually easier to track for TRK, and MUCH easier to understand for the uninformed. When football season arrives, BIG plays will become HUGE, and HUGE plays will become GNP's if something isnt done. Then the huge pissing contest all over again, and people change names, repeat cycle. I just get tired of having to weed thru all the name-calling trying to find any info on teams I dont have or may have missed. Just my 2cents, but I havent had anyone really try to piss on me since an NFL 2nd half in NOV.