<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by truthteller:
Guys, remember AK is one of the most notorius scammers. He shouldn't be allowed to post on any forum. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I think everyone pretty much knows AK's posting history and takes him with a grain of salt. We were anxiously awaiting your return since you left everyone to speculate with your hit and run approach earlier.
If you know something post it otherwise why bother. Your vague post is about as usefull as you telling everyone it may rain in the states Thursday.
Guys, remember AK is one of the most notorius scammers. He shouldn't be allowed to post on any forum. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I think everyone pretty much knows AK's posting history and takes him with a grain of salt. We were anxiously awaiting your return since you left everyone to speculate with your hit and run approach earlier.
If you know something post it otherwise why bother. Your vague post is about as usefull as you telling everyone it may rain in the states Thursday.
It would not be the first time Hollywood had to borrow money, and I am sure it won't be the last. A lot of books borrow money, bottom line is they pay. No reason to scare people because a book borrowed money.
A lot of books win in baseball, if you don't you are doing something wrong. All it takes is one or two big weeks and the book is in the black. Sometimes books lose in a season, but in the course of seasons they end up with the cash. Otherwise everyone would have a $.20 line
A lot of books win in baseball, if you don't you are doing something wrong. All it takes is one or two big weeks and the book is in the black. Sometimes books lose in a season, but in the course of seasons they end up with the cash. Otherwise everyone would have a $.20 line
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Miles O'Toole:
I think everyone pretty much knows AK's posting history and takes him with a grain of salt. We were anxiously awaiting your return since you left everyone to speculate with your hit and run approach earlier.
If you know something post it otherwise why bother. Your vague post is about as usefull as you telling everyone it may rain in the states Thursday. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Don't you think it's useful to advise people to only have money offshore that they can afford to lose?
As Judge said, not because a book is getting beat up, they will not pay.
I think everyone pretty much knows AK's posting history and takes him with a grain of salt. We were anxiously awaiting your return since you left everyone to speculate with your hit and run approach earlier.
If you know something post it otherwise why bother. Your vague post is about as usefull as you telling everyone it may rain in the states Thursday. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Don't you think it's useful to advise people to only have money offshore that they can afford to lose?
As Judge said, not because a book is getting beat up, they will not pay.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by truthteller:
Don't you think it's useful to advise people to only have money offshore that they can afford to lose?
As Judge said, not because a book is getting beat up, they will not pay. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I agree with you 100% about not gambling with money that you cant afford to lose. That is advice that we have heard countless times from various other posters. The only difference is that they didnt start a thread claiming books in CR are getting hit hard in bases to convey their message.
If you are truly tryng to be a players advocate then how about cutting out the vague BS. We have seen this song and dance before. In 5 weeks when Joe Blow complains about XYZ Sportsbook you will come back in here and say how you warned everyone.
That is my problem with your thread. You came off BIFF - Like
Don't you think it's useful to advise people to only have money offshore that they can afford to lose?
As Judge said, not because a book is getting beat up, they will not pay. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I agree with you 100% about not gambling with money that you cant afford to lose. That is advice that we have heard countless times from various other posters. The only difference is that they didnt start a thread claiming books in CR are getting hit hard in bases to convey their message.
If you are truly tryng to be a players advocate then how about cutting out the vague BS. We have seen this song and dance before. In 5 weeks when Joe Blow complains about XYZ Sportsbook you will come back in here and say how you warned everyone.
That is my problem with your thread. You came off BIFF - Like
I am not going to put a run on a book when I haven't heard of one slow pay from them.
You can't afford to lose money offshore, don't wait for me to name books that are having financial trouble to make a decision.
The last time I called out gambler's avenue before they went out of biz, I got so much shit from players and mods a like for naming the book.
It's a no win situation.
Hey lander, you should have said the same thing about your Boss a few weeeks ago.
You can't afford to lose money offshore, don't wait for me to name books that are having financial trouble to make a decision.
The last time I called out gambler's avenue before they went out of biz, I got so much shit from players and mods a like for naming the book.
It's a no win situation.
Hey lander, you should have said the same thing about your Boss a few weeeks ago.
