So much for the Global Warming theory.........

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,530
Tokens
Extreme Cold Expected Over Next 2-3 Weeks

Tuesday January 20, 1:59 PM EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The United States east of the Rocky Mountains will see extreme cold in the next two to three weeks with at least one forecaster calling it the coldest in 25 years, meteorologists said on Tuesday.

"In the next six to 10 days, it will be colder than normal north of a line from Washington, D.C. to Denver," said Joe Bastardi of AccuWeather. "In the next 15 to 20 days, everybody is extremely cold including freezes into Florida and Texas.

"In the worst-case scenario, in much of the energy consuming areas of the country, from the Rockies to New England, can look at the coldest 10- to 20-day periods since the winters of 1977 and 1978," Bastardi said.

Oil and heating oil prices were up partly on colder forecasts than last Friday when the markets were last open, oil industry analysts said on Tuesday. Heating oil futures hit $1.0230 a gallon, up 4.3 percent with crude oil hitting a high of $36.20 a barrel, up 3.2 percent.

Natural gas futures hit a high of $6.315 per million British thermal units, up 5.2 percent, with the link to weather more clear, said energy traders and analysts.

And forecasters agree.

"Everybody is waking up to this," Bastardi said of the extreme cold forecasts for the next 10- to 15 days. "Natural gas is surging like crazy this morning."

Bastardi points out that he correctly predicted that New England several weeks ago would experience its lowest temperatures since 1994 or 1996, and that proved correct.

Chris Hyde, meteorologist with EarthSat forecasters, also said the next two to three weeks will be colder than normal, but he did not say whether temperatures will be as low as 1977 or 1978.

"The more notable change versus last week's forecast is ac**** the Midwest," Hyde said. "The Boston-to-Washington D.C. corridor will continue to hang tough with the chilly readings with little volatility."

The National Weather Service is predicting that Friday the Midwest and Northeast will have temperatures 8 F to 12 F below normal, with Jan. 27 still showing below normal temperatures for northern New England and with temperatures near normal for New York City.

Forecaster Meteorlogix said the five-day outlook for the Northeast shows up to 12 F below normal by Wednesday and up to 15F below normal by Saturday. In the same time period, the Midwest will be up to 10 F below normal Wednesday and up to 4 F below normal on Saturday.

The six- to 10-day forecast shows "below normal" temperatures for the Northeast and northern part of the Midwest, Meteorlogix said on Tuesday.

Florida's citrus and vegetable growers probably not have to worry about frost in the next two weeks, Hyde said.

For the citrus-growing area from Orlando southward, EarthSat is calling for "seasonal" temperatures in its 11-15 day forecast.

"Overall, these cold air masses are not penetrating that far south," said Hyde.

Bastardi added that there will be significant snowfall over much of the Eastern United States in the next three weeks.

"Snow lovers are going to have storms and rumors of storms," Bastardi said.

"This could be one of the top five coldest Januarys in New England, in the last 50 years anyway," Bastardi said.
 

"The Real Original Rx. Borat"
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,882
Tokens
Please don't be ignorant. Because it is cold in some places it doesn't change the fact the our ice caps are melting. Don't try to ignore it. WTF is the reason you want to ignore it?
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
This is as retarded a proclomation as providing irrefutable 'proof' supporting global warming by using a two-week heatwave as an example. KMan, you're smarter than this.
 

"The Real Original Rx. Borat"
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,882
Tokens
Right on xpanda my brother. It's the same thing throughout the scientific world. We are in such a hurry to develop scientific discoveries that we neglect the ramifications. Has anyone read the unabombers manifesto?
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
"Glaciers provide a nice photo op for speeches on global warming, but scientists disagree with Gore's belief that the past behavior of one or a few glaciers can reliably be used as a predictor of future global temperature."
**********************
John Carlisle, "Behavior of World's Glaciers Fails to Prove Global Warming Theory," National Center for Public Policy Research, February 1999, at http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA235.html

You enviromentalist wackos just go on and on and on. Remembers it better to keep your mouth shut and let everyone think your an idiot than to open your mouth and prove it. You couldn't come close to explaining the physics of temperature change and it effects on the earth. No scientist can. So forget about it.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Fair enough sentiment, JP, but you still have to admit that the weather forecast for two weeks is hardly evidence enough to prove or disprove the theory of global warming.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,146
Tokens
"Fair enough sentiment, JP, but you still have to admit that the weather forecast for two weeks is hardly evidence enough to prove or disprove the theory of global warming."

And conversely, you must admit that, given the the 10,000 years that have passed since the last ice age, the approximately 100 years of temperature data relied on by the Gores of the world "is hardly enough" data "to prove or disprove the theory of global warming".
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
608
Tokens
Through thermodynamic modeling of the World, it is impossible to say. But knowing the rest of the world outside of the US is united in the theory of Global Warming leads me to believe that even though they may not believe there is a cause and effect relationship between the industrial revolution and global warming, there are enough phenomena to make people wonder and ponder whether changing our practices could prevent a catastrophe.
In this regard I agree… why not change things regarding the concern that a global catastrophe could happen? Why are so many people hell bent on the idea that since there is conflicting data nothing needs to be changed? I would think that doing nothing in regards to a problem that the majority of the world regards as a serious threat is more of a doomsday scenario, than saying if we do something now, we may be able to prevent something in the future.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Floyd Gondolli:
"Fair enough sentiment, JP, but you still have to admit that the weather forecast for two weeks is hardly evidence enough to prove or disprove the theory of global warming."

And conversely, you must admit that, given the the 10,000 years that have passed since the last ice age, the approximately 100 years of temperature data relied on by the Gores of the world "is hardly enough" data "to prove or disprove the theory of global warming".<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

That would mean something if I actually posted any data whatsoever trying to prove or disprove the theory. Did you assume that because I don't like George Bush that I must be pro-Gore?

Silly rabbit ...

In truth, I neither believe nor disbelieve the notion of global warming. I don't understand it well enough to have much of an opinon. However, I believe that the Republican administration's dismissal of the notion is directly related to the pocket lining by corporations that stinks up the White House ... whether global warming is currently thought to be fact or not, it should not be immediately dismissed in favour of continued industry practices which may harm you and I but keep the Board of Directors reeling it in.
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
"might", "may", "could", "possible"

Interesting how these words appear so often when the left wingers try to backslide a bit on the issue of global warming.
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
Kind of like a life insurance saleman was trying to sell me some life insurance.

"you never know", he said, "you could go to the circus and get stepped on by an elephant."
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
I said 'may' quite intentionally, because, as I already stated, I am no expert in this field.

At any rate, why the need to lump all 'left-wingers' together as though there can be only one ideology, one agenday, one train of thought, and certainly, obviously, if you believe in one left-wing notion you must believe in them all?!?!

Idiotic.
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
Your absolutely right xpanda,

The same disease will manifest itself somewhat differently in each of those who have the disease.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Would you risk leaving your family with nothing because you didn't accept the fact that you "might" die?

I'm sure your poverished children would understand that this was purely and idealogical decision to show that life insurance is akin to global warming
icon_rolleyes.gif


Ironically, one degree of irresponsibility is answered with a comparison to another act or irresponsibility.

Well, at least you're consistant.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
JP: 'disease'???? Having a different opinion than yours is to be diseased? Interesting logic.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
948
Tokens
Hate to spoil the party here, but we do all realize that the phenomenon called "global warming" means the erosion of the atmosphere and hence more extreme temperatures hot AND COLD, right?

The article above, if it is evidence of anything, is evidence in favor of global warming.

Have a nice day.

[This message was edited by SunDevil on January 20, 2004 at 05:14 PM.]
 

role player
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,302
Tokens
xpanda,

I know I come ac**** kinda harsh on the internet, but in person, I do smile a lot.
icon_smile.gif
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,179
Messages
13,565,030
Members
100,759
Latest member
68gamebaiartt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com