- Status
Wilheim,
Back off. All I did was give my opinion. I never called Skybook a profane name. I'm still waiting on Mike or Keith to chime in and explain why their book is customer unfriendly, relative to the top books out there. Wil, hopefully you won't find any profane name calling in this post.
Dude, If you only knew the whole story. I agree with you that it's not Skybooks responsible to collect my debt. The point of this whole thread, why is Skybook so customer unfriendly when it comes to an account to account transfer. For the last 6 days Account A has requested that a portion of his account be transferred "with conditions" to account B. Why wouldn't Skybook grant their customer his request. I don't see any pitfalls Skybook would incurr by granting their customer his request. I only see positive customer goodwill that could have been gained. Why won't Mike or Keith explain their inflexibility. I 've talked to Scotty at Betjamaica and he would have allowed this transfer with conditions. I'm sure Betphoenix, who I think is a very friendly book would also allow this transfer.
I certainly hope they don't do shit for you. What an asshole... you think you can just come in here, start a thread bad mouthing a book, thinking that because their reputation could get hurt then they'd rather shut you up and just do whatever the fuck you are asking them to do... even though its not something they offer.
zeeman
I alrady edited out one comment that was out of line by you. Skybook has no obligation to change long standing rules just so you don't have to worry about some private debt that is none of their business.
Learn how to judge the people you do business with and you won't find yourself in these spots. You also need to act like a grown up and take responsibility for your own actions, no one caused you to be in this position except yourself.
Find the person that owes you and collect what you have coming, what kind of person accepts a lame excuse like all my money is tied up offshore and I can't make a transfer because it hasn't been there long enough.
I can guarantee you very few books would change their rules for you in this situation. Skybook is not in businss to be a bank for you because one of their players owes you money privately, neither is any other Offshore book.
Once a book receives a deposit they have rules that include rollover and a minimum time before certain types of transactions can take place. Rules are there for a reason and to accuse a book like Skybook that does all it can to satisfy it's players when they have a legitamate problem of being inflexable is wrong.
Books are in business to offer wagering opportunities to their clientele not to sieze funds from an account that has not satisfied all of the pre approved by the player conditions required before that player can withdraw or transfer those funds.
Skybook is well within their rights to stand by their rules.
wilheim
I alrady edited out one comment that was out of line by you. Skybook has no obligation to change long standing rules just so you don't have to worry about some private debt that is none of their business.
Learn how to judge the people you do business with and you won't find yourself in these spots. You also need to act like a grown up and take responsibility for your own actions, no one caused you to be in this position except yourself.
Find the person that owes you and collect what you have coming, what kind of person accepts a lame excuse like all my money is tied up offshore and I can't make a transfer because it hasn't been there long enough.
I can guarantee you very few books would change their rules for you in this situation. Skybook is not in businss to be a bank for you because one of their players owes you money privately, neither is any other Offshore book.
Once a book receives a deposit they have rules that include rollover and a minimum time before certain types of transactions can take place. Rules are there for a reason and to accuse a book like Skybook that does all it can to satisfy it's players when they have a legitamate problem of being inflexable is wrong.
Books are in business to offer wagering opportunities to their clientele not to sieze funds from an account that has not satisfied all of the pre approved by the player conditions required before that player can withdraw or transfer those funds.
Skybook is well within their rights to stand by their rules.
wilheim
Like I said Above, Didn't know the Detail's.
Now that they are Out. I can tell you what Wil has Posted is 100% Correct.
Spending Over 26 Years in the Business, I could tell you In No Way Shape or Form. Would I Hold Someone elses Funds because Of a "Outside" Wager
Has Nothing to do with the Book. Nothing at All.
I could ( But won't ) go into Detail's about something Almost like this, But I am 100% Sure My story is for A Lot More Money.
And there was NOTHING we could Do !
Now that they are Out. I can tell you what Wil has Posted is 100% Correct.
Spending Over 26 Years in the Business, I could tell you In No Way Shape or Form. Would I Hold Someone elses Funds because Of a "Outside" Wager
Has Nothing to do with the Book. Nothing at All.
I could ( But won't ) go into Detail's about something Almost like this, But I am 100% Sure My story is for A Lot More Money.
And there was NOTHING we could Do !
That's what I'm waiting for. Sure books have rules, but shouldn't management have some flexibility in enforcing their rules. I know Scotty at Betjamaica does. I'm sure your familar with this phrase: NO HARM, NO FOUL. There would have been no harm in allowing this transfer.
I think I've have made my point !
Let me just tell you I have No Beef with you.
But You're Not seeing My point Zee.
As a Book, They don't want to Involve Them selfs with Outside Wagers,Bets, or any other things that do not Concern them.
I think if there was Not a 7-14 day Hold on the Funds to Begin with. They wouldn't have a Problem with a Transfer.
Betall,
Thanks for the feedback. I feel the only point in question is what harm would there be if Skybook was to allow the transfer with the conditions the holding period would be the same on receiving account. Nobody has explained why Skybook's management can't be flexible when enforcing rules. Betall, do you see any harm in allowing this transfer to happen.
- Status
