Dude, you got a hard on for this guy or what. If you don't like what he has to say or his plays / analysis why don't you just stay out of his threads. It is really quite easy to dohno:
I find it funny that Simple's posse is whining about people staying out of their threads when it was Simple's hijacking of threads that started this pissing match.hno:
Marco, I am not whining about a damn thing merely pointing out the obvious to a blind man:missingte:nono5:. Oh, and at the same time, what the hell does this have to do with you:WTF:
Dude-
1. Your boy started the shit.
2. You ARE whining about it. Come on man, you are bitching about the same damn thing your boy did.
3. It has as much to do with me as it does you - not jack shit!
If you would bother to frickin read what I said to numnuts in the first place is that if he didn't like the guys posts, reasoning or what he had to say then why did he not merely stay out of his threads. A-hole escalated it from there. I could care less what "my boys" said. I am basing my statements on what I said
My first post in this thread
Dude, you got a hard on for this guy or what. If you don't like what he has to say or his plays / analysis why don't you just stay out of his threads. It is really quite easy to dohno:<!-- / message -->
Your boy simple is such an asshole, now he has all your buddies arguing.
:think2:
You mean because it does not take money for advertising from Sportsbooks like this site as well as the vast majority of sites like this. You mean because it is privately owned so it is not swayed by 'outside advertisers' Is that what you are referring to?I think it's funny that Simpleballs is a moderator at a forum that has to solicit members for donations to stay afloat.
You mean because it does not take money for advertising from Sportsbooks like this site as well as the vast majority of sites like this. You mean because it is privately owned so it is not swayed by 'outside advertisers' Is that what you are referring to?
He means it is more vastly controlled by who ever is count's friends.You mean because it does not take money for advertising from Sportsbooks like this site as well as the vast majority of sites like this. You mean because it is privately owned so it is not swayed by 'outside advertisers' Is that what you are referring to?
He means it is more vastly controlled by who ever is count's friends.
:nohead:Count, 1-2-3-4-5
He must run the forum like sesame street.
Sorry, but I can't help it.
I guess what I'm saying is if you come across a forum and it looks appealing to you then you would probably assume the owner has the funds to keep it operating or else they wouldn't have created it in the first place.
I went to around 5 different threads and in those five moderators were quoted as soliciting for donations. It's a little overboard IMO.
He means it is more vastly controlled by who ever is count's friends.
:nohead:Count, 1-2-3-4-5
He must run the forum like sesame street.
Sorry, but I can't help it.
He means it is more vastly controlled by who ever is count's friends.
:nohead:Count, 1-2-3-4-5
He must run the forum like sesame street.
Sorry, but I can't help it.
Woody, tell him that the word Sites needs an apostrophe as it's possesive. I bet he'd like that.I feel like Jesse James. I must have gotten under the count's skin. He has this posted at the top of the site.
RX USER WOODYPAIGE IS A COCKSUCKER - STOP STALKING THIS SITES MEMBERS!!
Is there a reward out for me yet. He might start asking for more donations to help get me off his sight.:lol: