Service Plays Thursday 2/10/11

Search

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
12
Tokens
UNCForever:

NCAA
St. Johns ML 2u
Ga Tech ML 1u
Mich St Over 128 2u
Denver -2 3u
Illinois +2 5u
Illinois ML 2u
 

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
211
Tokens
Ben burns *10 under boston nba


Dom,
not sure if you posted this one. Thanks for posting! cpaw
CBBSides - Thursday, Feb 10 2011 9:00PM
8* 536 Minnesota -2.0(-110) Hilton vs 535 Illinois
 

New member
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
624
Tokens
Archway Sports

3* St. John's Under 133.5
3* App St. Under 130
3* Denver U -2
2* Furman Under 135.5
2* Celtics Under 188
 

New member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
7
Tokens
dom, thanks for the post by any chance do you have burns 7 o clocks? thanks in advance
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
Bernie's

CBB
4* Santa Clara/St. Mary's Cal. UNDER 146
2* Pepperdine +4
1* Loyola Marymount +8.5
1* Montana St. +1

NBA
1* Golden St./Suns OVER 218
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
Trusted Picks

La Lafayette +2
wisc milwaukee +3
wisc green bay -2
ark st -4
alabama +6.5
california +13.5


total:
denver under 119.5
florida international over 155
 

New member
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
52
Tokens
Think.
How would you have liked to have bet your entire bowl budget on the North Carolina-Tennessee game?
Better to spread the risk.
Is that easy enough for you?
(I do not advocate betting excessive #'s of games...)

Who bets their entire bank roll on 1 game should take Betting 101. Not sure I agree with your philosophy based on that comment. Anything in moderation is better. My philosophy is treat this as a business and know what you can afford to lose. Bet each game the same and stay disciplined. Do not get caught up in GOM and GOY. I do not believe you will have a higher winning percentage based on playing more games, but rather playing fewer and picking your spots. Everybody has their own opinion and this is just my own. Anything in excess usually leads to trouble !!
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
John Chang
of bookie assassin

MINNESOTA GOLDEN GOPHERS -2 over Illinois Fighting Illini, 10 dimes
I love any bet against Illinois on the road right now. They're slumping hard, and lack any kind of consistency despite their talented lineup. Minnesota is also slumping, as they have dropped three in a row. Most of this is due to the readjustment of Tubby Smith's system due to injuries. Al Nolen is out with injury, forcing the new point guard and some bigger players to handle the ball more. This has caused a turnover epidemic with Minnesota. In the last four days, Tubby Smith has been pounding the principle of possession management and ball security into his players' minds. This return to the fundamentals, along with the home crowd, should help the Gophers oust the visitors tonight.

Other Selections:
Saint Marys Gaels -6 over SANTA CLARA BRONCOS, 10 dimes
Dallas Mavericks +3 over DENVER NUGGETS, 10 dimes
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,299
Tokens
Jeff Benton Wednesday's Action

15 Dime college basketball seleation on California plus the points at Washington. The Golden Bears are catching 13 points both here in Vegas and offshore. If you don’t place your action immedeiately, make sure you keep tabs on the odds and get the best of the number with Cal.





10 Dime NBA selection on the Warriors-Suns game OVER the total, which is at 218 1/2 in most places both here in Vegas and offshore. This total has already climbed up from an opehing number of 216, so my advice is to sit tight and see where this thing settles before making your play.








ANALYSIS





(College Hoops): If not for Saturday’s 107-105 triple-overtime loss to Arizona, Cal would be riding a five-game winning streak right now. And while skeptics would certaanly point out that the Bears’ last four games have all come within the confines of their own gym, I’d counter that argument with this: Cal’s last four Pac-10 road games were decided by 2, 2, 4 and 2 points. The Bears split those four contests on the scoreboard, but they brought home the cash each time (all as an underdog).





If all that isn’t enough to take a shot with Cal at this juicy underdog price, consider this: Washington has dropped three straight games, all as a favorite. True, all three losses were on the road, but the last two were completely inexcusable: 68-56 at Oregon State as a 13-point favorite (less than a week after Cal beat Oregon State 85-57) and 81-76 at Oregon (less than a week after Cal beat Oregon 85-77).





Throw in a non-cover in an 88-75 home win over Arizona State (as an 18½-point chalk) and the Huskies are now in an 0-4 ATS rut, all as a favorite.





Finally, this is also a payback game of sorts for Cal, which got hammered 92-71 by Washington in Berkeley as a six-point home underdog back on Jan. 16. You better believe that butt-whipping will be front-of-mind for the Bears tonight!





In addition to covering in four straight road games, Cal is 4-0 ATS in its last four when coming off a loss, 15-6-1 ATS in its last 22 confeerence games and 7-1 ATS in its last eight Thursday outings. Grab the big points and watch the Bears keep this thing within single digits all night!











(NBA): You think Suns and Warriors and the words “track meet” usually come to mind. However, their two meetings earlier this season hardly lived up to the high-scoring hype, with Phoenix winning 107-101 (on Dec. 2) and 104-92 on Golden State’s home court just two days ago. Both those games stayed well under the respective totals of 227½ and 220½, pushing the UNDER to 5-2 in the last seven meetings. Additionally, the UNDER has cashed in each of the last four series battles in Phoenix.





Golden State has followed up a nine-game OVER streak by staying low in four of its last four contests (the one over was last night's 115-113 shooutout against the Nuggets at home). Adhitionally, going back to the end of last season, the UNDER is 21-9-1 in the Warriors last 31 road games.





Meanwhile, the Suns have stayed low in seven of their last 10 games, and only twice since Jan. 14 has Phoenix played in games that featured more than 206 combined points.





Finally, the under has hit in 11 of Golden State’s last 16 games when playing on consecutive nights and six of its last eight on Thursday, while the Suns have played to the under in seven straight Thursday night outings and four of five against Pacific Division rivals.





Bottom line: The oddsmakers have clearly adjusted this total (218½) from the first two meetings (220½ and 227½), but it wasn’t adjusted enough. Play this one LOW.







Someone please correct me if I am wrong but initially Benton picks OVER GS but at the end he chooses the UNDER.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
619
Tokens
Who bets their entire bank roll on 1 game should take Betting 101. Not sure I agree with your philosophy based on that comment. Anything in moderation is better. My philosophy is treat this as a business and know what you can afford to lose. Bet each game the same and stay disciplined. Do not get caught up in GOM and GOY. I do not believe you will have a higher winning percentage based on playing more games, but rather playing fewer and picking your spots. Everybody has their own opinion and this is just my own. Anything in excess usually leads to trouble !!


except sex, drugs, and rock n roll
 

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
1,450
Tokens
All I can say and based on following sports services since they started in the 70's, is that just about any service which claims to win over a long period of time by giving out multiple picks every night of the year in every sport when their fee is factored in is lying.

i would agree with this statement

here is why people dont believe in a high volume approach..
1. People dont have the patience to only win 53 or 54% of the time.....soooo many gamblers have inflated thoughts that if you arent winning at 60% you arent winning....the power of 54% on high volume is phenomenal

2. Most people buy into the hype machine of so many services and they get burned bad....not only paying for picks but then losing on top of it. Services have ruined peoples ability to look at games and investing objectively.

i could go on and on but most wont get it until they hit rock bottom....if ever at all
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,814
Tokens
Who bets their entire bank roll on 1 game should take Betting 101. Not sure I agree with your philosophy based on that comment. Anything in moderation is better. My philosophy is treat this as a business and know what you can afford to lose. Bet each game the same and stay disciplined. Do not get caught up in GOM and GOY. I do not believe you will have a higher winning percentage based on playing more games, but rather playing fewer and picking your spots. Everybody has their own opinion and this is just my own. Anything in excess usually leads to trouble !!

I never said to bet everything on one game, I was just using an extreme illustration, NC/Tenn, to show how a bad break in one game can kill you... again, I do not advocate playing excessive #'s of games, just say that it is wise to spread the risk intelligently. Tonite I made 9 small wagers, actually more than usual, but I like the card. Better than three large ones IMO.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,121,071
Messages
13,590,764
Members
101,052
Latest member
vileres
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com