so because 1 play lost they're not good? he has a good record if im not mistaken face)(*^%i thought this forum was used for fading purposes, no? I didn't think anyone in their right mind on this site would tail these picks. Please tell me you guys aren't that gullible!this forum is a cash cow for faders such as I!
ADDED:
1* GAME: Magic-Nets o195 (-110: Risking 1.10 units to win 1.00 units) - TBD (TBDu)
burns other pucks play
st louis blues
Einstein. 1/2 the touts pick one side, 1/2 pick the other. So how do you say you win by fading? Tell me.i thought this forum was used for fading purposes, no? I didn't think anyone in their right mind on this site would tail these picks. Please tell me you guys aren't that gullible!this forum is a cash cow for faders such as I!
Sounds like you are calling out CPAW. Wtf?
The guy does a phenomenal job, I don't think he needs you to tell him how to run a forum
I am not calling out anyone-it has nothing to do with cpaw.
I have a right just as you do to express an opinion about anything including one about a service which recommends/ tells a clent to bet his entire bankroll on one game.
More adds:
1* GAME: Bulls-Knicks o185.5 (-110: Risking 1.10 units to win 1.00 units) - TBD (TBDu)
1* GAME: Warriors +4.5 (-110: Risking 1.10 units to win 1.00 units) - TBD (TBDu)
1.5* GAME: Timberwolves +2 (-110: Risking 1.55 units to win 1.50 units) - TBD (TBDu)
"If I ran this forum" sounds like a slap in the face to me. You certainly do have a right to voice your opinion and I have a right to defend the man that busts his ass so that you can constantly post negative comments. Go away, it sounds like you have an agenda against CPAW. You never have anything good to say about his posts.
i thought this forum was used for fading purposes, no? I didn't think anyone in their right mind on this site would tail these picks. Please tell me you guys aren't that gullible!this forum is a cash cow for faders such as I!