I never mentioned anything about the Dallas / SJ game. in fact, I was on SJ yesterday so not sure what you mean...
I have this stupid NHL System I take the Red Wings, NJ Devils (before Brodeur went out), San Jose, Montreal and Pitts. I take them to win every game. If they lose, I double up and chase. These teams rarely lose more than 3/4 in a row, so if you have the roll, it's effective.
so having bet on the sharks every time during this winning streak, I question if they can hold it up as they seem to be tiring with all the travel of late..
I will kindly dissagree. The game should have been 14-0 half way through the first quarter with any luck. Fumbled into the endzone from the 1 inch line that would of made it 14-0. when it was 7-7 LSU got a lucky fumble on the KO. It was 14-14 and Bama had 3 costly turnovers in the first half. A phantom holding call on Wilsons running TD late. I know the FG miss was big that would have been a PUSH for most so nothing would have been lost. OT did bring the Victory. Thats sports wagering bottom line, no matter how much you evaluate a game there is luck and breaks involved. You can be on the wrong side and win and be on the right side and lose.
look at how the game ended, bama had basically an extra point blocked that would have been a push or lsu win, had a tip toe int in ot on 3rd down, then stopped inside the 2 on first, most would just kick, but they get in on 2nd for a td to cover. if u played the end of that game out 100 times, i think lsu covers 95 times or so from the winning fg on. squeaking out a victory in ot, is not a good win to me either way.
falcons were up 24-0 or something like that after first half and neither team scored in 2nd. raiders have walter in there which always opens the option of fumble returns or int returns. delhomne obviously sucks today with his 3 ints. i could of look for a field position battle with very few points. even carolina 2 tds came on a fumble recovery inside oak's 20 and a 69 yard run. no drives
