Statsystems report 10/30
STAN THE MAN'S STAT/SYSTEMS REPORT 10/30
NCAA COLLEGE FOOTBALL
INFO WORTH BETTING ON ONE PAGE EACH DAY
________________________________________________
***** STAT/SYSTEMS SPORTS POWER SEARCH -- CFB *****
• AWESOME ANGLE OF THE WEEK
------------------------------------------
This weeks’ AWESOME ANGLE takes the field this afternoon at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium in Annapolis, Maryland and it tells to play against the Midshipmen after their upset win of Notre Dame. “And that my friend is exactly what we’ll do!”
--PLAY AGAINST: Any college favorite that beat Notre Dame as an underdog in its last game if it beat the spread by 10 or more points and is facing a sub .600 opponent today. ATS W-L Record Since 1980: 10-0-1 (100%).
Turning to our huge database it dialed-up several tidbits of its own: the Middies are 0-10 ATS at home off a SU dog win and just 4-12 SU and 3-13 ATS at home versus ACC opposition. Meanwhile; HC David Cutcliffe's work is also a factor in this decision as the third-year HC of Duke is already an overwhelming 14-6-1 ATS as an underdog off a SU loss and 3-1 ATS away versus an opponent off a SU dog win.
Like so many other FBS schools, the Naval Academy has scheduled the likes of the Blue Devils from Duke as their Homecoming opponent. "And that’s just fine, this one gets better-looking with every passing hour, we suggest grabbing all of those beautiful points!"
• CFB SYSTEM OF THE WEEK
-----------------------------------
In the aftermath of more upsets, including the third straight week the No.1 team in the nation lost, will Week 9 hold true to form or will the dogs prevail again facing the giants of college football.
There is absolute no denying the brilliance of Cam Newton, who is doing things at the QB position no one has ever done, and with the Tigers unbeaten there are both Heisman Trophy and BCS notions to make them a public darling. That sets this up well for us, as we now catch a team playing for the 9th straight week that can be very vulnerable in this setting, especially given the fact that nothing is going to come easily for them anyway!
This week sees Auburn ranked No.1 after another tough SEC victory against LSU. Auburn must play a potentially tough game against upset minded Mississippi and the Tigers are favored by seven points. As we have seen throughout all of college football and especially in the SEC, seven points is not a guarantee that any favored team will win there game.
If you do not think that the No. 1 team can lose four straight weeks then take a close look at this Super Situational System as this game may be a whole lot closer than most observers believe possible. PLAY ON - Underdogs of 3.5 to 10 points - off a loss by 10 points or more to a conference rival against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(29-8 over the last 10 seasons.) (78.4%, +20.2 units)
Once again, and to seal the deal we turned to our powerful database for suggestions: Ole Miss stands 3-1 ATS in the series of late, 9-2 ATS as a home dog of seven or more points and 8-2 ATS in the first of consecutive home encounters. Coach Nutt also brings to the table a 4-0 SU and ATS mark as a home underdog versus an opponent allowing 19 or more PPG.
The Rebels will have to play a perfect game to pull off the upset and they do have a strong history playing against elite passing offenses. Rebels are a rock-solid 21-9 ATS (+11.1 Units) facing strong offensive teams scoring 34 or more points per game since 1992.
THIS WEEK'S PLAY: MISSISSIPPI +7
_________________________________
• INCREDIBLE STATS OF THE WEEK
-------------------------------------------
--FLORIDA - Head Coach Urban Meyer is 18-2 SU and 16-3-1 ATS when his teams play with rest, including 5-0 SU and ATS when not favored.
--IOWA: Is 1-10 ATS at home following a home loss if they allowed less than 35 points in the loss.
--WASHINGTON: Is 14-3 ATS as Pac-10 home underdog versus an opponent off back-to-back wins, including 8-0 ATS off a double-digit defeat.
• AMAZING SITUATIONAL TRENDS
-------------------------------------------
--OHIO STATE: Is 18-0-1 ATS (6.5 ppg) since 1994 when facing a team they beat by between 28 and 35 last meeting within the past 2000 days, if they are not favored by 38 or more, were not favored by 31 or more last game.
--NEW MEXICO: Is 15-0 ATS (12.3 ppg) since 1997 when not on a Friday night and facing a team they scored between 28 and 33 points against last meeting.
--SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI: Is 0-11 ATS (-9.5 ppg) since 2001 when facing a conference team they allowed between 28 and 33 points to last meeting.
--TULANE: Is 0-10 ATS (-12.3 ppg) since 2005 when facing a team which it scored between 21 and 27 points against last meeting, if they did not get shutout in their previous game.
--TOLEDO: Is 0-9 ATS (-14.8 ppg) since October 2005 when facing a team it beat by at least 25 points last meeting.
_________________________________________________
• TOP RATED TEAM ATS TRENDS
---------------------------------------
--AIR FORCE is 0-12 ATS (-13.2 Units) off a blowout loss by 21 points or more to a conference rival since 1992.
The average score was AIR FORCE 22.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 5*)
--NORTH TEXAS is 2-18 ATS (-17.8 Units) after a game where they committed no turnovers since 1992.
The average score was NORTH TEXAS 16.6, OPPONENT 31 - (Rating = 5*)
--AIR FORCE is 4-23 ATS (-21.3 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a conference rival since 1992.
The average score was AIR FORCE 25.8, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 4*)
--ARIZONA ST is 14-1 ATS (+12.9 Units) versus terrible rushing teams - averaging <=90 rushing yards/game since 1992.
The average score was ARIZONA ST 36.7, OPPONENT 16.8 - (Rating = 4*)
--BUFFALO is 0-9 ATS (-9.9 Units) when the total is between 42.5 and 49 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was BUFFALO 15.8, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 4*)
--KANSAS is 2-16 ATS (-15.6 Units) after allowing 31 points or more in 3 straight games since 1992.
The average score was KANSAS 16.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 4*)
--MARSHALL is 13-1 ATS (+11.9 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 4 or 5 out of their last 6 games since 1992.
The average score was MARSHALL 38.4, OPPONENT 23.6 - (Rating = 4*)
--OHIO ST is 11-1 ATS (+9.9 Units) after a game where they forced 3 or more turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was OHIO ST 33.6, OPPONENT 14 - (Rating = 4*)
--SAN JOSE ST is 0-10 ATS (-11 Units) after playing 3 straight conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN JOSE ST 13.2, OPPONENT 31.1 - (Rating = 4*)
--UCF is 12-1 ATS (+10.9 Units) when playing with 6 or less days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was UCF 27.2, OPPONENT 18.9 - (Rating = 4*)
--ILLINOIS is 1-11 ATS (-11.1 Units) in home games after leading in their previous game by 17 or more points at the half since 1992.
The average score was ILLINOIS 22.4, OPPONENT 20.2 - (Rating = 3*)
--IOWA is 17-3 ATS (+13.7 Units) versus excellent rushing teams - averaging >=5.25 rushing yards/carry since 1992.
The average score was IOWA 32.9, OPPONENT 22.6 - (Rating = 3*)
--IOWA ST is 8-0 ATS (+8 Units) after having lost 2 out of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was IOWA ST 24.4, OPPONENT 16.6 - (Rating = 3*)
--KANSAS is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was KANSAS 19.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 3*)
--KANSAS is 1-10 ATS (-10 Units) after the first month of the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was KANSAS 19.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 3*)
__________________________________________________ _
• TOP RATED TEAM OVER/UNDER TRENDS
---------------------------------------------------
--VANDERBILT is 12-0 UNDER (+12 Units) against conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was VANDERBILT 9.1, OPPONENT 24.7 - (Rating = 6*)
--ARIZONA ST is 10-0 OVER (+10 Units) in home games off a road blowout loss by 21 points or more since 1992.
The average score was ARIZONA ST 31.5, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 4*)
--IDAHO is 12-1 OVER (+10.9 Units) as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was IDAHO 22.4, OPPONENT 44 - (Rating = 4*)
--ILLINOIS is 16-2 UNDER (+13.8 Units) after scoring 24 points or more in the first half last game since 1992.
The average score was ILLINOIS 18.3, OPPONENT 21 - (Rating = 4*)
--VIRGINIA is 10-0 UNDER (+10 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive games where they forced 1 or less turnovers since 1992.
The average score was VIRGINIA 20.1, OPPONENT 11 - (Rating = 4*)
--STANFORD is 12-1 OVER (+10.9 Units) after playing 2 straight conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was STANFORD 35, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 4*)
--IDAHO is 14-2 OVER (+11.8 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was IDAHO 24.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 3*)
--IDAHO is 11-1 OVER (+9.9 Units) in road games when playing with 6 or less days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was IDAHO 26.7, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 3*)
--IDAHO is 8-0 OVER (+8 Units) in road games after playing a conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was IDAHO 27, OPPONENT 50.2 - (Rating = 3*)
--MICHIGAN ST is 18-4 OVER (+13.6 Units) in road games in October games since 1992.
The average score was MICHIGAN ST 24.8, OPPONENT 27.9 - (Rating = 3*)
--KANSAS is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) after a game where they forced 1 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was KANSAS 23.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 3*)
--KANSAS ST is 29-9 OVER (+19.1 Units) off a loss against a conference rival since 1992.
The average score was KANSAS ST 31.7, OPPONENT 24.5 - (Rating = 3*)
--KANSAS ST is 9-0 OVER (+9 Units) after a playing a game where 80 total points or more were scored since 1992.
The average score was KANSAS ST 37.6, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 3*)
_________________________________________________
• TOP RATED TEAM FIRST HALF TRENDS
-------------------------------------------------
--HAWAII is 8-0 (+8 Units) against the 1rst half line versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was HAWAII 20.6, OPPONENT 8.1 - (Rating = 4*)
--TROY is 9-0 (+9 Units) against the 1rst half line after a game where they committed 3 or more turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TROY 20.2, OPPONENT 6.8 - (Rating = 4*)
--UTAH is 7-0 (+7 Units) against the 1rst half line versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was UTAH 25, OPPONENT 4.7 - (Rating = 3*)
--UTAH is 7-0 (+7 Units) against the 1rst half line as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was UTAH 25, OPPONENT 4.7 - (Rating = 3*)
--COLORADO ST is 11-1 (+9.9 Units) against the 1rst half line in home games when playing on a Saturday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was COLORADO ST 14.3, OPPONENT 9.2 - (Rating = 3*)
--IOWA is 22-5 (+16.5 Units) against the 1rst half line in home games off 1 or more straight overs since 1992.
The average score was IOWA 17.5, OPPONENT 5.9 - (Rating = 3*)
--IOWA ST is 8-0 (+8 Units) against the 1rst half line after having lost 2 out of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was IOWA ST 14.4, OPPONENT 5.4 - (Rating = 3*)
--BALL ST is 15-2 (+12.8 Units) against the 1rst half line after having lost 6 or 7 out of their last 8 games since 1992.
The average score was BALL ST 10.8, OPPONENT 15.6 - (Rating = 3*)
--SAN JOSE ST is 2-12 (-11.2 Units) against the 1rst half line in games played on a grass field over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN JOSE ST 6.1, OPPONENT 21.9 - (Rating = 3*)
--UTAH is 6-0 (+6 Units) against the 1rst half line when the first half total is between 25 and 28 this season.
The average score was UTAH 26.8, OPPONENT 4.3 - (Rating = 2*)
--UTAH is 6-0 (+6 Units) against the 1rst half line when playing on a Saturday this season.
The average score was UTAH 26.8, OPPONENT 4.3 - (Rating = 2*)
--UTAH is 6-0 (+6 Units) against the 1rst half line after 1 or more consecutive straight up wins this season.
The average score was UTAH 26.8, OPPONENT 4.3 - (Rating = 2*)
__________________________________________________ ____
Experience is what this business is all about, and good money can be made if one has the right connections. Stan 'The Man' prides himself on uncovering the edge that gives his customers the ability to beat the sports books on a consistent basis. Stan is a full time Expert Handicapper that can help you consistently beat the books. With any package that you purchase it is fully guaranteed that you show a profit, or he'll extend your service at no charge. If you have any questions about our services call 1-800 -351-4640, “You’ll be real glad you did!” -Stan
____________________________________________
• TOP RATED TEAM FIRST HALF OVER UNDER TRENDS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--KENTUCKY is 9-0 OVER (+9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rushing defenses - allowing <=120 rushing yards/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was KENTUCKY 13.2, OPPONENT 22.4 - (Rating = 4*)
--TULANE is 9-0 UNDER (+9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULANE 5.6, OPPONENT 13.9 - (Rating = 4*)
--UCLA is 20-3 OVER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus excellent rushing defenses -allowing <=2.75 rushing yards/carry since 1992.
The average score was UCLA 16.1, OPPONENT 17.1 - (Rating = 4*)
--NORTH TEXAS is 12-1 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 3 out of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NORTH TEXAS 12.8, OPPONENT 24.2 - (Rating = 4*)
--NORTH TEXAS is 13-1 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a conference rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NORTH TEXAS 15.4, OPPONENT 25.6 - (Rating = 4*)
--NORTH TEXAS is 9-0 OVER (+9 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss by 10 points or more to a conference rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NORTH TEXAS 18.2, OPPONENT 27.1 - (Rating = 4*)
--ARKANSAS is 8-0 UNDER (+8 Units) the 1rst half total off 1 or more straight overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ARKANSAS 10.6, OPPONENT 8.9 - (Rating = 3*)
--ARKANSAS is 8-0 UNDER (+8 Units) the 1rst half total after a playing a game where 60 total points or more were scored over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ARKANSAS 11.9, OPPONENT 8.4 - (Rating = 3*)
--CLEMSON is 9-0 OVER (+9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1992.
The average score was CLEMSON 18.3, OPPONENT 10.1 - (Rating = 3*)
__________________________________________________ __
• TOP RATED COACHING TRENDS - ATS
------------------------------------------------
--Kirk Ferentz is 15-2 ATS (+12.8 Units) versus excellent rushing teams - averaging >=5.25 rushing yards/carry as the coach of IOWA.
The average score was Ferentz 33.3, OPPONENT 23.2 - (Rating = 4*)
--Ralph Friedgen is 11-1 ATS (+9.9 Units) versus good rushing teams - averaging >=200 rushing yards/game as the coach of MARYLAND.
The average score was Friedgen 29.8, OPPONENT 16.7 - (Rating = 4*)
--Jim Tressel is 23-6 ATS (+16.4 Units) after having won 4 out of their last 5 games as the coach of OHIO ST.
The average score was Tressel 30.9, OPPONENT 13.2 - (Rating = 4*)
--Rich Rodriguez is 3-16 ATS (-14.6 Units) against conference opponents as the coach of MICHIGAN.
The average score was Rodriguez 23.2, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 4*)
--Rich Rodriguez is 3-16 ATS (-14.6 Units) after the first month of the season as the coach of MICHIGAN.
The average score was Rodriguez 23.9, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 4*)
--Bob Petrino is 11-1 ATS (+9.9 Units) in home games after scoring 31 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1992.
The average score was Petrino 46.7, OPPONENT 15.2 - (Rating = 3*)
--Bob Petrino is 17-3 ATS (+13.7 Units) in home games in the second half of the season in all games he has coached since 1992.
The average score was Petrino 43.1, OPPONENT 21.9 - (Rating = 3*)
--Urban Meyer is 16-3 ATS (+12.7 Units) after a bye week in all games he has coached since 1992.
The average score was Meyer 36.6, OPPONENT 17.3 - (Rating = 3*)
--Kirk Ferentz is 30-11 ATS (+17.9 Units) after covering the spread in 4 or 5 out of their last 6 games as the coach of IOWA.
The average score was Ferentz 28.9, OPPONENT 16.5 - (Rating = 3*)
--Kirk Ferentz is 22-7 ATS (+14.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - averaging >=5.9 yards/play as the coach of IOWA.
The average score was Ferentz 30.3, OPPONENT 24 - (Rating = 3*)
--Paul Rhoads is 8-0 ATS (+8 Units) after having lost 2 out of their last 3 games as the coach of IOWA ST.
The average score was Rhoads 24.4, OPPONENT 16.6 - (Rating = 3*)
--Larry Blakeney is 17-4 ATS (+12.6 Units) after allowing 125 or less rushing yards in 2 straight games as the coach of TROY.
The average score was Blakeney 27.9, OPPONENT 18.9 - (Rating = 3*)
__________________________________________________ ______
• TOP RATED COACHING TRENDS - OVER/UNDER
------------------------------------------------------------
--Ralph Friedgen is 19-4 UNDER (+14.6 Units) after a game where they committed no turnovers as the coach of MARYLAND.
The average score was Friedgen 23.8, OPPONENT 20.4 - (Rating = 4*)
--Ralph Friedgen is 33-11 UNDER (+20.9 Units) after a game where they committed 1 or less turnovers as the coach of MARYLAND.
The average score was Friedgen 21.8, OPPONENT 21.2 - (Rating = 4*)
--Kevin Sumlin is 11-1 OVER (+9.9 Units) after a game where they committed 1 or less turnovers as the coach of HOUSTON.
The average score was Sumlin 43.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 4*)
--Mack Brown is 23-6 OVER (+16.4 Units) vs. excellent passing teams with a completion pct. of 62% or better as the coach of TEXAS.
The average score was Brown 38.7, OPPONENT 27.8 - (Rating = 4*)
--Mark Dantonio is 14-3 OVER (+10.7 Units) in road games as the coach of MICHIGAN ST.
The average score was Dantonio 32.2, OPPONENT 29.7 - (Rating = 3*)
--Kirk Ferentz is 13-2 OVER (+10.8 Units) in home games vs. good offensive teams - scoring 31 or more points/game as the coach of IOWA.
The average score was Ferentz 29.5, OPPONENT 26.2 - (Rating = 3*)
--Kirk Ferentz is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) in home games vs. very good offensive teams - scoring 34 or more points/game as the coach of IOWA.
The average score was Ferentz 31, OPPONENT 27.1 - (Rating = 3*)
--Mike Gundy is 8-0 UNDER (+8 Units) in a road game where the total is between 63.5 and 70 as the coach of OKLAHOMA ST.
The average score was Gundy 31.4, OPPONENT 23.6 - (Rating = 3*)
--Jim Tressel is 17-4 UNDER (+12.6 Units) off a home blowout win by 28 points or more as the coach of OHIO ST.
The average score was Tressel 29.8, OPPONENT 12.1 - (Rating = 3*)
--David Cutcliffe is 12-1 UNDER (+10.9 Units) in road games after gaining 125 or less rushing yards in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1992.
The average score was Cutcliffe 16.8, OPPONENT 24.3 - (Rating = 3*)
--David Cutcliffe is 9-0 UNDER (+9 Units) in road games after gaining 125 or less rushing yards in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1992.
The average score was Cutcliffe 18.8, OPPONENT 25.7 - (Rating = 3*)
--Larry Fedora is 8-0 OVER (+8 Units) as a home favorite of 7.5 to 14 points as the coach of SOUTHERN MISS.
The average score was Fedora 43.7, OPPONENT 29.6 - (Rating = 3*)
--Jerry Kill is 8-0 UNDER (+8 Units) after a win by 21 or more points as the coach of N ILLINOIS.
The average score was Kill 22.1, OPPONENT 14.1 - (Rating = 3*)
--Dennis Erickson is 26-11 UNDER (+13.9 Units) when playing on a Saturday as the coach of ARIZONA ST.
The average score was Erickson 26.4, OPPONENT 21.9 - (Rating = 2*)
__________________________________________________ ______
• TOP RATED TEAM TEASER LINE TRENDS
---------------------------------------------------
--UTAH is 25-1 (+21.8 Units) against a teaser line when playing on a Saturday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was UTAH 38.1, OPPONENT 16.8 - (Rating = 3*)
--UTAH is 16-0 (+16 Units) against a teaser line as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was UTAH 38.1, OPPONENT 13.4 - (Rating = 2*)
--UTAH is 27-2 (+20.7 Units) against a teaser line in games played on a grass field over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was UTAH 37.1, OPPONENT 17.1 - (Rating = 2*)
--PITTSBURGH is 22-1 (+18.8 Units) against a teaser line after the first month of the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PITTSBURGH 30.5, OPPONENT 20.3 - (Rating = 2*)
--AIR FORCE is 15-0 (+15 Units) against a teaser line after gaining 75 or less passing yards in last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was AIR FORCE 22.8, OPPONENT 17.9 - (Rating = 1*)
--UTAH is 44-6 (+25 Units) against a teaser line after allowing 75 or less rushing yards last game since 1992.
The average score was UTAH 29.8, OPPONENT 17.3 - (Rating = 1*)
--UTAH is 19-1 (+15.8 Units) against a teaser line in all games against a 6 point teaser line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was UTAH 36.1, OPPONENT 17.6 - (Rating = 1*)
--PITTSBURGH is 15-0 (+15 Units) against a teaser line after playing a conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PITTSBURGH 29, OPPONENT 19.9 - (Rating = 1*)
--TCU is 15-0 (+15 Units) against a teaser line after allowing 7 points or less in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TCU 38.3, OPPONENT 11.2 - (Rating = 1*)
--TCU is 21-1 (+17.8 Units) against a teaser line off 2 or more consecutive unders since 1992.
The average score was TCU 35.2, OPPONENT 15.5 - (Rating = 1*)
--UTAH is 24-2 (+17.7 Units) against a teaser line after 1 or more consecutive straight up wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was UTAH 37.4, OPPONENT 17.2 - (Rating = 1*)
--UTAH is 19-1 (+15.8 Units) against a teaser line against conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was UTAH 35.9, OPPONENT 16 - (Rating = 1*)
--ARIZONA ST is 15-0 (+15 Units) against a teaser line versus terrible rushing teams - averaging <=90 rushing yards/game since 1992.
The average score was ARIZONA ST 36.7, OPPONENT 16.8 - (Rating = 1*)
--TCU is 30-3 (+20.5 Units) against a teaser line after gaining 275 or more rushing yards last game since 1992.
The average score was TCU 34.8, OPPONENT 14.7 - (Rating = 1*)