Fade ATS Lock w/ Ness
When ATS Lock and Larry Ness are on the same play, it loses close to 70% of the time since I've been following. They went 1-4 on the same plays last weekend and if you faded those plays, you ended up 4-1.
Today they agreed on Michigan and Buffalo and both lost ATS, although Ness claims a push on Buffalo, I saw nearly 4 1/2 everywhere and scoresandodds had it never leaving 4 1/2. Of course, Ness never takes a loss on a close play, he'll either claim a win or a push. That's why he never releases a number with his picks, because if it's close, he'll find a different number somewhere that would have avoided the loss. Nice 6-1 if you faded their plays in agreement over the past two weekends.
By the way, ATS Lock lost their first four plays today with 8*Florida International, 6*Michigan, 6*UCLA, and 6*Buffalo and have one pending. They lost all three plays last night with 5* Over LAL-Orl, 4* Pistons, and 4* Spurs. The night before that, they lost their two bigger plays with 5* Wisconsin, 4* Western Kentucky, and only hit their smallest play, 3* Wisconsin GB.
That's losing their last nine plays 4* and over. Three night record of 1-9 and down 45 units. Yet, I'm sure as they always do, they'll send me a mailing and email that they are killing the books this month and are up over 100 units this month already.
hno:
When ATS Lock and Larry Ness are on the same play, it loses close to 70% of the time since I've been following. They went 1-4 on the same plays last weekend and if you faded those plays, you ended up 4-1.
Today they agreed on Michigan and Buffalo and both lost ATS, although Ness claims a push on Buffalo, I saw nearly 4 1/2 everywhere and scoresandodds had it never leaving 4 1/2. Of course, Ness never takes a loss on a close play, he'll either claim a win or a push. That's why he never releases a number with his picks, because if it's close, he'll find a different number somewhere that would have avoided the loss. Nice 6-1 if you faded their plays in agreement over the past two weekends.
By the way, ATS Lock lost their first four plays today with 8*Florida International, 6*Michigan, 6*UCLA, and 6*Buffalo and have one pending. They lost all three plays last night with 5* Over LAL-Orl, 4* Pistons, and 4* Spurs. The night before that, they lost their two bigger plays with 5* Wisconsin, 4* Western Kentucky, and only hit their smallest play, 3* Wisconsin GB.
That's losing their last nine plays 4* and over. Three night record of 1-9 and down 45 units. Yet, I'm sure as they always do, they'll send me a mailing and email that they are killing the books this month and are up over 100 units this month already.
hno:
When ATS Lock and Larry Ness are on the same play, it loses close to 70% of the time since I've been following. They went 1-4 on the same plays last weekend and if you faded those plays, you ended up 4-1.
Today they agreed on Michigan and Buffalo and both lost ATS, although Ness claims a push on Buffalo, I saw nearly 4 1/2 everywhere and scoresandodds had it never leaving 4 1/2. Of course, Ness never takes a loss on a close play, he'll either claim a win or a push. That's why he never releases a number with his picks, because if it's close, he'll find a different number somewhere that would have avoided the loss. Nice 6-1 if you faded their plays in agreement over the past two weekends.
By the way, ATS Lock lost their first four plays today with 8*Florida International, 6*Michigan, 6*UCLA, and 6*Buffalo and have one pending. They lost all three plays last night with 5* Over LAL-Orl, 4* Pistons, and 4* Spurs. The night before that, they lost their two bigger plays with 5* Wisconsin, 4* Western Kentucky, and only hit their smallest play, 3* Wisconsin GB.
That's losing their last nine plays 4* and over. Three night record of 1-9 and down 45 units. Yet, I'm sure as they always do, they'll send me a mailing and email that they are killing the books this month and are up over 100 units this month already.
are they on anything else left for today?
A stat that might interest you guys?
Copy and Pasted
63-0-2 ATS Stat For Conf Championship NFL Games
Since 1970, in Conference Championship games where the line is less than 10 points, the winning team is a perfect 63-0-2 against the spread
Pick the straight up winner in these games, and win the bets.
Think the dog covers, play them on the moneyline.
Copy and Pasted
63-0-2 ATS Stat For Conf Championship NFL Games
Since 1970, in Conference Championship games where the line is less than 10 points, the winning team is a perfect 63-0-2 against the spread
Pick the straight up winner in these games, and win the bets.
Think the dog covers, play them on the moneyline.
