Claiming a 69% win ratio is pure nonsense. Anyone that has been betting on sports for any extended period of time knows that a 69% win rate is
just not possible.
Is Intpicks a good service? I have no idea because I have not used the service. I do know that in my 30 years of betting on sports I have come across
2 handicapping services that are worth the money. The dozens of other services I've used have lost money.
I do appreciate the Intpicks being posted if for nothing other than tracking purposes.
Best of luck
I believe that in ONE given season a service can and has got that hot to have an extraordinary winning percentage!!
However to maintain it for in this case eleven years is impossible I don't care what methodology is used.
The bounce of the ball so to speak, the betting line itself and other unexpected things that can and will happen during games,
intangibles and a lot more even out meaning a 69% winning percentage cannot be attained with the bigger plays, and
for that matter neither can 59% over that long a period of time.
The claim of a profit over that period of 372K for a hundred dollar play per unit is not only not true but imo insulting
when the claims of other top services over a significant period of time is a tiny fraction in the five figures!!
What I posted over the last few days with the top services maintaining a winning perentage in the low 50% and not even reaching 55%
is clear evidence of that.
If I was just starting out with sports gambling and didn't have the knowledge I have about sports services since following
them since they began in the70's and even having used them way back, I wouldn't be running my mouth!!
Factor in my age of 79(ugh), meaning that I have a pretty good knowledge of life itself!!
That's it for me unless of course the service itself or its representative in this thread agrees to post all of their picks in this thread for FREE
for say a month with the existing lines when they are released!!
if they can manage a 69% winning percentage with their top plays or even a 59% winning percentage, then perhaps someone
who wants to try them out in this thread can oblige and buy the picks and tell us how they are doing!!
If the service feels that they would be losing too much potential money by posting their plays publicly BEFORE they start,
then I suggest that they submit them to a moderator who will agree NOT to post them but at the end of the day when the
are over, to release them and how they did!!
In short and to summarize, imo the chances are that tis service is much better than most and may actually be near the top
and doesn't need to exaggerate its record.
If this occurs and/or I see other evidence/documentation from the Sports Monitor or some other recognized monitoring
service, I will maintain a rightful healthy bit of skepticism!!
I am going to take back the word "lie" I used yesterday because I don't have the actual plays released over the eleven years
not how they did, meaning I can't actually prove that they did not hit 69% even though I listed quite a list of reasons
why they did not/could not achieve that.