Hmm..am I wrong about this?
Can someone straighten me out...if I'm wrong? I always thought that Andy Iskoe wrote the newsletter "The Logical Approach". If this is the case, why would he talk Texas up in the newsletter and then in CPAW's write-up, scream about how much he loves Alabama? Am I wrong about the Logical Approach? And if so, who publishes it? Thanks.
ANDY ISKOE
VI Premium Picks Pack 1/7 BCS CHAMPIONSHIP
Premium Plays
Matchup: Texas at Alabama
Time: 8:35 PM EDT (Thu)
Play: Under (+46 -110)
Line Source: SPORTSBOOK
Posted on: January 7, 2010 @ 10:39:30 AM EST
This is the game many expected back in August. Or at least one of the most likely matchups as Texas was considered a solid choice to make it here to face Alabama, Florida or USC. USC was eliminated early in the season while both Florida and Alabama headed into their SEC Title game showdown unbeaten. Alabama won that game convincingly while Texas needed a fortuitous turn of events and a last second FG to edge Nebraska in the Big 12 Title game to play for the BCS Title. Both teams bring outstanding credentials into this contest. The defenses are ranked # 2 and # 3 in yardage and # 1 and # 8 in points. The offenses also rated highly with Alabama having the better rush attack and Texas better at tossing the pigskin. Alabama lost just 10 turnovers all season and was +16 in turnover margin. Texas created 35 turnovers and was +12 in margin. By virtue of playing in the SEC Alabama played the more demanding schedule. Their significantly better ATS mark also shows they performed better versus expectations than did Texas. Of course just prior to the win over Florida, Alabama struggled to bet by arch rival Auburn, coming from behind in the closing minute. Likewise Texas struggled to hold off their arch rival Texas A&M. Both teams are well coached and each coach already has a National Title – Texas’ Brown with their win over USC a few years back and ‘Bama’s Saban as coach at LSU 2 seasons earlier. Both teams will be well prepared on both sides of the football. Texas arguably has the better ability to come from behind with their more polished passing game. These defenses also rank #1 and #2 against the rush, making it important for Alabama’s offense to develop a passing game. Clearly either team can will this game and if these teams faced one another 50 times each should win 25. The value in this game is with Texas, based largely upon what everyone saw in both teams’ conference Championship games. For much of the season books that had “future” lines on potential BCS matchups had this matchup pretty much a pick ‘em. Both teams are highly motivated. Texas may be fueled as well by their feeling of being slighted last season despite defeating Oklahoma which lost to Florida in the BCS Title game. The Longhorns did not make it to the Big 12 Title game despite sharing the Big 12 South title with Oklahoma and Texas Tech. Teams ranked #2 have historically fared well when facing teams ranked #1 and with not much separating these teams the preference is to take the points with the Underdog. But with the line dropping close to a FG the preferred play for this game is the UNDER. We have two outstanding defenses and two solid but not dominating offenses. We've seen how defenses have placed greater emphasis on speed over the past decade or so and the split second difference between a good and a great defense is enough to interrupt offensive rhythm enough over the course of a game to cause offensive execution to suffer against great defenses when such execution succeeds against average to good defenses. This game handicaps in the mid to upper 30s, along the lines of 20-16 to 23-17, making the UNDER a solid play, especially as the Total rises above a "key" number of 45.
Handicapper: Andy Iskoe
Matchup: Texas at Alabama
Time: 8:35 PM EDT (Thu)
Play: Alabama (-4 -110)
Line Source: SPORTSBOOK
Posted on: January 7, 2010 @ 10:39:30 AM EST
Throughout the entire season I loved Alabama to win it all. I then preceded to go against them as they faced Florida, and that was obviously a mistake that I paid for.
Texas just won't be prepared defensively for the power run game the Crimson Tide have. And Alabama's defense is just so physical and good.
I think Alabama takes this one by double-digits.
Can someone straighten me out...if I'm wrong? I always thought that Andy Iskoe wrote the newsletter "The Logical Approach". If this is the case, why would he talk Texas up in the newsletter and then in CPAW's write-up, scream about how much he loves Alabama? Am I wrong about the Logical Approach? And if so, who publishes it? Thanks.