hey dawg,icant tell you how frustrating this news is.ive been to over 2 dozen forums and cant find them anywhere.i wish whoever was posting the plays would stop. my question though, is mac has his own separate plays from all the other guys, such as capone the manager chuck.l ect ect. does mac have a problem wtih those also?
golden contender, I'm not "positive", but Im pretty sure the answer to your question is yes, Mac does get mad about the others being posted because they are part of his "group" he uses. Mac makes it a point to only use winners in his "group", and if they have more than one bad year, he cuts them loose. Many of the guys you listed, Like Joey Dimes, Blackie, The Manager Chuck Luck, Syndicate, etc. had good/winning records last year, as well as this year.
Excell, my amount per play varies..If I told you actually how much (dollar wise) that I played per game, you prob wouldnt believe and would only set myself up for basing, not saying you would, but I know from experience there are guys "just waiting to take their shot" because of the exposure I have recieved on here. Not trying to avoid your question, but my amount varies alot from play to play.I simply tried to use the unit rating to give you guys which play is stronger than the next, which is why I am going to the L, X, XX, AND XXX starting tommorow..For example, if Den comes thru tonight, with the Clipps already gone down, I will make a considerable chunck tonight, but based on the way I posted it would only show a slight profit.I guess what I am trying to say is in the past there have been guys that only post in my threads when it is something negative or when they can take a shot, and they know who they are, so if I listed the dollar amount, they would have a field day!!
DAWG
DAWG
hey hitman,there are alot of forums you can go to.i even did a google search and went into alot of them however of your lucky enough to find a forum where someone will post the top players pix it will be a once in a while thing. you will find sevice posts all over the place they are a dime a dozen but as far as the games everyone wants im stuck ill keep trying but im running out of ideas fast. bol
dawg, I can't see why brian mac would get mad at you posting his plays. if anything it gives him more exposure.I never heard of him untill just recently and i've been doing this thing of ours for a long time. I would even consider using his service and if i do he has u to thank.anyway i don't get a chance to post much but a big thanks to u and the other guys who contribute to the service plays
hey dawg the large xx, xxx, idea is great no one needs to know your amounts anyway. thats kind of private. i think i speak for almost everyone in your threads.when i say the appreciation is just that you take the time to share the plays.im not even trying to kiss your ass i just know its time consuming to do it.bol
thanks dawg for all your help, i only discovered this site a few weeks ago, but i feel like we are on to something very positive here..i hope this is just the beginning and we all make alot of money together
Excell, i know what u mean about the units?, it is tough to gauge because everybody's units seem to mean something different...and this can be a very "debatable" topic because everybody has an opinion about what is best...but this is what has worked for me so maybe it is something you would like to try...i think in terms of percentage of bankroll...so with dawg's new rating guide i will do as follow..since my top play is always 2% of my bankroll and my regular plays are 1% of my bankroll...when dawg releases a xxx it will be 2% and all other plays will be 1%..keep in mind 90% of my plays are usually for 1%...this is a conservative betting style that fits my profile of a grinder who makes about 1000 picks a year with an expectation of 55% on regular plays and 55-58% on my top plays...i know it is tempting to bet more than 2 percent of your bankroll on a play but keep a long term perspective...and the best part is as your bankroll grows so do your wagers...
and lastly dont ever fall for the hype of a guy like mike lee, who tells you to bet 8% of your bankroll on a top play...when the inevitable losing streak occurs..your money will be gone just when things are about to turn for the bettor..gla
Excell, i know what u mean about the units?, it is tough to gauge because everybody's units seem to mean something different...and this can be a very "debatable" topic because everybody has an opinion about what is best...but this is what has worked for me so maybe it is something you would like to try...i think in terms of percentage of bankroll...so with dawg's new rating guide i will do as follow..since my top play is always 2% of my bankroll and my regular plays are 1% of my bankroll...when dawg releases a xxx it will be 2% and all other plays will be 1%..keep in mind 90% of my plays are usually for 1%...this is a conservative betting style that fits my profile of a grinder who makes about 1000 picks a year with an expectation of 55% on regular plays and 55-58% on my top plays...i know it is tempting to bet more than 2 percent of your bankroll on a play but keep a long term perspective...and the best part is as your bankroll grows so do your wagers...
and lastly dont ever fall for the hype of a guy like mike lee, who tells you to bet 8% of your bankroll on a top play...when the inevitable losing streak occurs..your money will be gone just when things are about to turn for the bettor..gla
Why don't some of you guys just ask Dawg for copies of his last three years tax returns?
Just kidding!
I think I understood Dawg to say that he modifies the value of his units based on a "feel" for this sources.
These are my words not his... but I think that is what he is saying.
SO... The number of units or obviously the amount per unit matters not!
Just be grateful that if he has these sort of connections he will spend the time to pass ANY of it along.
Some of you leaches kill me... After his very first post you jump on here with "Anything on Brian Mac?" or "Any personal plays Dawg?"
Give the man his props and be thankful and most of all don't clutter his threads with these childish pissy questions!
Also... The X, XX, whatever gives you a general feel for the strength he gives the play. Makes sense to me! What else do you want?
[This message was edited by Packer on January 07, 2004 at 11:30 AM.]
Just kidding!
I think I understood Dawg to say that he modifies the value of his units based on a "feel" for this sources.
These are my words not his... but I think that is what he is saying.
SO... The number of units or obviously the amount per unit matters not!
Just be grateful that if he has these sort of connections he will spend the time to pass ANY of it along.
Some of you leaches kill me... After his very first post you jump on here with "Anything on Brian Mac?" or "Any personal plays Dawg?"
Give the man his props and be thankful and most of all don't clutter his threads with these childish pissy questions!
Also... The X, XX, whatever gives you a general feel for the strength he gives the play. Makes sense to me! What else do you want?
[This message was edited by Packer on January 07, 2004 at 11:30 AM.]
