I agree 100%. Also, how right was he actually? That game in Piscataway last night could of easily been 34-30 USF. Wasn't Sekrah the one saying that there was no way Rutgers wouldn't win by 14-17 in that spot? Wasn't Sekrah also running his mouth to me about how overrated Matt Grothe was? Wasn't Sekrah also the one who said that the Rutgers game would open up at Rutgers -7. Yeah, in the end he got the game right but his analysis was completely off. He got into some heated arguments with Prodigy and was wrong on almost every point he made.
He was banned during the USF/Rutgers game last night, in the in-game thread. Mods asked him to cool it with the name-calling and such, he didn't, they put him on post review and he responded with an obscenity directed at the mod.
If you want to get banned, that's pretty much a how-to manual to follow.
I gave that kid good advice and he attacked back. Anybody who post an undocumented winning percentage should be banned for that. Why should we have to try and guess who is valid and who is not? There is a tracker that validates anybody who wants the attention.
We are lucky that he wasn't smart enough to lie about a more realistic winning percentage than 65% or we might have really been mislead. There is no reason to act like some 19 year old backwards hat wearing poker geek in here. Just pick winners and you will get more attention than you probably want.
He is 2-1 plus two units for this weekend so far, just to be fair.
We are lucky that he wasn't smart enough to lie about a more realistic winning percentage than 65% or we might have really been mislead. There is no reason to act like some 19 year old backwards hat wearing poker geek in here. Just pick winners and you will get more attention than you probably want.
He is 2-1 plus two units for this weekend so far, just to be fair.
Who said you have to post a record? I don't. But I don't make ridiculous claims either. But if you do post a record shouldn't you have to have some kind of documentation?
No what is ridiculous is making the claim that you are a 65% winner over 400 games the last three years and not having any documentation to back up that nonsense. We didn't need documentation to prove that was a lie but why should we have to put up with liars? Tell me what positive contribution lying about your undocumented winners does for this forum?
No, I don't care if a person has any documentation or not. It's up to me as a forum user to decide how much weight I give any other poster's opinions. If it seems to me that what they claim and the results I observe are two different things, that tells me a whole lot about how valuable their opinions are. But to say a person should be required to document every pick they make being allowed to post a record can't be enforced, and shouldn't be.
It would really only matter to a user blindly following someone, relying solely on a record they themself have no way of knowing the validity of. And cases like are a little like buying a used car -- buyer beware.
You're calling for accountability on something that doesn't matter. It shouldn't make any difference what a user claims their record is until a person follows them long enough to know whether or not it seems like they're shooting straight.
