Seahawks -15

[seer]

alot of u dont understand.
which games are worth the most pts wise?
answer:
divisional games

there is no more rivalry between hawks and raiders. last i checked sea is now in nfc

oakland will want to play hard against denver rather than seattle. if u guys dont know that by now
u should really stop nfl gambling.

look at skins barely eeking out with tennessee...why? they had dallas next. they just got enough to get the win against the useless condoms then they came out hard against the boys. shocked me but now in retrospect it shouldnt. it is a div game worth 4pts!!! not 2pts

sharps hate to bet large spreads but seattle should win 1q 1h and game
gl wiz

 

[wizard1183]

alot of u dont understand.
which games are worth the most pts wise?
answer:
divisional games

there is no more rivalry between hawks and raiders. last i checked sea is now in nfc

oakland will want to play hard against denver rather than seattle. if u guys dont know that by now
u should really stop nfl gambling.

look at skins barely eeking out with tennessee...why? they had dallas next. they just got enough to get the win against the useless condoms then they came out hard against the boys. shocked me but now in retrospect it shouldnt. it is a div game worth 4pts!!! not 2pts

sharps hate to bet large spreads but seattle should win 1q 1h and game
gl wiz

Thanks seer!

 

[REDEYE]

alot of u dont understand.
which games are worth the most pts wise?
answer:
divisional games

there is no more rivalry between hawks and raiders. last i checked sea is now in nfc

oakland will want to play hard against denver rather than seattle. if u guys dont know that by now
u should really stop nfl gambling.

look at skins barely eeking out with tennessee...why? they had dallas next. they just got enough to get the win against the useless condoms then they came out hard against the boys. shocked me but now in retrospect it shouldnt. it is a div game worth 4pts!!! not 2pts

sharps hate to bet large spreads but seattle should win 1q 1h and game
gl wiz

unless you have a bigger sample size with the divisional game look ahead instead of the Redskins last 2 games, what you posted is meaningless... every game has its own merit to cap

 

[wizard1183]

unless you have a bigger sample size with the divisional game look ahead instead of the Redskins last 2 games, what you posted is meaningless... every game has its own merit to cap

I know I honestly can't give sample sizes, but it's been seen countless times over and over again. It's one bet tho. Not playing it for all the marbles.

 

[REDEYE]

I know I honestly can't give sample sizes, but it's been seen countless times over and over again. It's one bet tho. Not playing it for all the marbles.

countless times the other way too I would imagine

 

[wizard1183]

countless times the other way too I would imagine

Then you should have no problem contributing to Oakland...

 

[REDEYE]

as of now I don't see it as a play for either side.....

 

[powerz]

alot of u dont understand.
which games are worth the most pts wise?
answer:
divisional games

there is no more rivalry between hawks and raiders. last i checked sea is now in nfc

oakland will want to play hard against denver rather than seattle. if u guys dont know that by now
u should really stop nfl gambling.

look at skins barely eeking out with tennessee...why? they had dallas next. they just got enough to get the win against the useless condoms then they came out hard against the boys. shocked me but now in retrospect it shouldnt. it is a div game worth 4pts!!! not 2pts

sharps hate to bet large spreads but seattle should win 1q 1h and game
gl wiz

Divisional Dogs 19-13 so far this year


GL wiz

 

[seer]

unless you have a bigger sample size with the divisional game look ahead instead of the Redskins last 2 games, what you posted is meaningless... every game has its own merit to cap

if ur a novice following the nfl then i will excuse this comment. if u read what i typed. div games are worth extra in weightings when the tie breakers are inherent. next is conf wins. raiders are in a non conf game on the road. which confirms the author of this posts reasoning. the lookahead is to denver- despite raiders likely having no chance of being in the playoffs but it is always sweeter when u can knock a div rival off their perch.
i am done writing in this thread and teaching stuff. this is why i only post plays without a w/u

 

[REDEYE]

if ur a novice following the nfl then i will excuse this comment. if u read what i typed. div games are worth extra in weightings when the tie breakers are inherent. next is conf wins. raiders are in a non conf game on the road. which confirms the author of this posts reasoning. the lookahead is to denver- despite raiders likely having no chance of being in the playoffs but it is always sweeter when u can knock a div rival off their perch.
i am done writing in this thread and teaching stuff. this is why i only post plays without a w/u

get over yourself.... You're not teaching jack.......

 

[statman03]

if ur a novice following the nfl then i will excuse this comment. if u read what i typed. div games are worth extra in weightings when the tie breakers are inherent. next is conf wins. raiders are in a non conf game on the road. which confirms the author of this posts reasoning. the lookahead is to denver- despite raiders likely having no chance of being in the playoffs but it is always sweeter when u can knock a div rival off their perch.
i am done writing in this thread and teaching stuff. this is why i only post plays without a w/u

we need more real pros like you around here

 

[TheComputerGroup]

What is the record for teams laying more than 2 TDs past 10 years, anyone know?

 

[wizard1183]

What is the record for teams laying more than 2 TDs past 10 years, anyone know?

Non-conf game, away dog getting over 14 pts is 1-25 SU and 16-10 ATS

 

[wizard1183]

0-9 SU and 6-3 ATS since 2004

 

[JohnBlue123]

Non-conf game, away dog getting over 14 pts is 1-25 SU and 16-10 ATS

Are you saying that the road dog has covered ATS more often than not? How does this support taking Seattle this week?

 

[JohnBlue123]

Divisional Dogs 19-13 so far this year


GL wiz

Is this SU or ATS?

 

[wizard1183]

Are you saying that the road dog has covered ATS more often than not? How does this support taking Seattle this week?

Its doesn't support my pick in the LEAST bit. LMAO! It's a stat. I may be wrong about the pick. I'm going with what I feel and see "could" happen. EVERYONE has been wrong before. In no way, shape or form have I said this game was a fucking LOCK, GOY, bet your kids Xmas money on or Guaranteed. Its one play that I feel pretty decent about could happen.

I see them getting blown out here, then playing Denver in a div game where the line will be set at 9-10 and they cover it with ease mirroring the Jets/Pats game. Public should pound Denver for 2 reasons:
1) Because Oak just got blown away (if they indeed do at CLink)
2) They lost to the Chargers who got blown away by Denver making them seem even less likely to have a chance.

 

[wizard1183]

2014 DIV dogs are actually:
11-24 SU and 18-17 ATS.
At Home: 5-8 SU and 6-7 ATS

 

[awon23]

The fuck? An 0-7 team does not look ahead to ANYBODY. They're 0-7. They're still trying to get their first win dummy.

 

[rolltide]

What is the record for teams laying more than 2 TDs past 10 years, anyone know?

F and line < -14 and ...

games	ATS W - L- P (marg, %win)	Avg Line	OU W - L- P (marg, %over)	Avg Total	SU W - L- P (marg, %win)	SDQL
0	0-0-0 (0.00, 0.0%)	-	0-0-0 (0.00, 0.0%)	-	0-0-0 (0.00, 0.0%)	season = 2014
5	3-2-0 (0.60, 60.0%)	-18.4	5-0-0 (10.60, 100.0%)	44.8	5-0-0 (19.00, 100.0%)	season = 2013
4	1-3-0 (0.25, 25.0%)	-15.8	2-2-0 (8.00, 50.0%)	42.0	4-0-0 (16.00, 100.0%)	season = 2012
4	2-2-0 (1.12, 50.0%)	-17.1	1-3-0 (-7.62, 25.0%)	45.9	4-0-0 (18.25, 100.0%)	season = 2011
1	0-1-0 (-12.50, 0.0%)	-14.5	1-0-0 (8.00, 100.0%)	46.0	1-0-0 (2.00, 100.0%)	season = 2010
7	5-2-0 (2.71, 71.4%)	-15.4	3-4-0 (2.00, 42.9%)	42.1	6-1-0 (18.14, 85.7%)	season = 2009
5	1-4-0 (-5.30, 20.0%)	-15.5	2-3-0 (-3.00, 40.0%)	46.0	5-0-0 (10.20, 100.0%)	season = 2008
12	5-7-0 (-0.04, 41.7%)	-17.7	7-5-0 (-1.88, 58.3%)	46.2	12-0-0 (17.67, 100.0%)	season = 2007
3	1-2-0 (-2.17, 33.3%)	-16.2	1-2-0 (-10.50, 33.3%)	41.8	3-0-0 (14.00, 100.0%)	season = 2006
7	4-3-0 (4.71, 57.1%)	-15.6	3-3-1 (-1.36, 50.0%)	43.4	7-0-0 (20.29, 100.0%)	season = 2005

F and line < -14 and season >= 2005 (steelers lost to raiders in 2009)
SU: 47-1-0 (16.83, 97.9%) Teaser Records ATS: 22-26-0 (0.30, 45.8%) avg line: -16.5 +6: 30-18-0 (62.5%) -6: 14-32-2 (30.4%) +10: 35-12-1 (74.5%) -10: 11-36-1 (23.4%) O/U: 25-22-1 (-0.04, 53.2%) avg total: 44.4 +6: 18-30-0 (37.5%) -6: 31-17-0 (64.6%) +10: 9-37-2 (19.6%) -10: 35-12-1 (74.5%)
Rushes Rush Yds Passes Comp Pass Yds TOs Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Final Team 31.2 132.8 31.1 21.4 254.8 1.5 6.8 11.0 6.1 6.5 30.6 Opp 24.3 95.2 33.0 19.1 184.6 1.9 1.8 4.7 2.9 4.2 13.8
Date Link Day Week Season Team Opp Site Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Final Line Total SUm ATSm OUm DPS DPA SUr ATSr OUr ot Nov 02, 2014 view Sunday 9 2014 Seahawks Raiders home -15.0 43.0