They have not lost just this year. If you use the MicroBrothers' database, you will see that since the 1990 season, -7 favorites are just 575-550-49 for 51.1%. This is a losing proposition as are most of the other specific point spreads alleged in his "system."
The SBP makes assertions that these point spreads win, but if you attempt to verify that with another independent database that goes back 20 years, sadly there is very little correlation. I have found this to be true in Version 2.0 MLB as well, and have been fading the plays since they were introduced and am +25.91 net units (I use opening lines and the tables provided in Version 2.0 not what is distributed to subscribers).
I would not accept anything on faith, and what is more troubling is that outside databases are not even close to confirming any of the specific point spreads that allegedly win.
You missed the point. I know he had a good NBA record- but that can be due to statistical variance- and often is. Variance in a crude sense means luck- since the plays he issues are based on his point spreads that are not valid. This means he could have the opposite result next year in the NBA and likely will.
MLB for both versions is terrible. Do your homework.
